نبذة مختصرة : Background: Parents commonly seek information to support the health and well-being of their children. The increasing availability of health information online and social changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic may have changed what information is sought, from whom, where, and why. This qualitative study explored parents' practices and perspectives on seeking health and digital technology use information for their young children.
Methods: Twenty parents, living in Australia (7 rural, 3 remote, and 10 metropolitan), with children aged 0-36 months completed a semi-structured interview.
Results: Parents commonly turned to friends and family and online sources to access health information for their young children. For all types of health information, including digital technology use, themes were identified surrounding aspects of information sources participants valued and accessibility of health services. Perceived credibility and trustworthiness, relatability with other parents, ease of accessibility and convenience, and actionable, bite-sized information were valued. Reduced accessibility to health services due to COVID-19 and geographical location, and need for agency in managing their child's health influenced parents' choice of source of information. Few participants actively sought information about digital technology use for their young child, with the main focus on screen time.
Conclusion: Interactions with family and friends and online sources are important to parents when accessing health information for their child. Parents valued information sources which they considered trustworthy, credible, and relatable, as well as easily accessible and convenient. SO WHAT?: Dissemination of health information reflecting these values may empower parents during this early stage of parenthood.
(© 2024 The Authors. Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association.)
References: Moore TG, Arefadib N, Deery A, West S. The first thousand days: an evidence paper. 2017. https://www.rch.org.au/uploadedFiles/Main/Content/ccchdev/CCCH-The-First-Thousand-Days-An-Evidence-Paper-September-2017.pdf.
Nelson CA, Zeanah CH, Fox NA. How early experience shapes human development: the case of psychosocial deprivation. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1676285.
Ismail FY, Fatemi A, Johnston MV. Cerebral plasticity: windows of opportunity in the developing brain. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21(1):23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.007.
Frey E, Bonfiglioli C, Brunner M, Frawley J. Parents' use of social media as a health information source for their children: a scoping review. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(4):526–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.006.
Garbutt JM, Leege E, Sterkel R, Gentry S, Wallendorf M, Strunk RC. What are parents worried about? Health problems and health concerns for children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(9):840–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922812455093.
Brockway ML, Keys E, Bright KS, Ginn C, Conlon L, Doane S, et al. Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the family research agenda initiative setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e047919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047919.
Danchin M. Top 10 child health problems: what Australian parents think. 2021. https://www.rchpoll.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NCHP20-Poll-report-A4_FA.pdf.
Rhodes A. Sources of child health information: what parents use and trust. 2016. https://www.rchpoll.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ACHP-detailed-report-Poll-2.pdf.
Gottlieb M, Dyer S, Courtney DM. Information and disinformation: social media in the COVID‐19 crisis. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(7):640–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14036.
Kubb C, Foran HM. Online health information seeking by parents for their children: systematic review and agenda for further research. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e19985. https://doi.org/10.2196/19985.
Lupton D. The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: a focus group study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2016;16(1):171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0971-3.
Pretorius K, Johnson KE, Rew L. An integrative review: understanding parental use of social media to influence infant and child health. Matern Child Health J. 2019;23(10):1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02781-w.
Moon RY, Mathews A, Oden R, Carlin R. Mothers' perceptions of the internet and social media as sources of parenting and health information: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):9. https://doi.org/10.2196/14289.
Strange C, Fisher C, Howat P, Wood L. ‘Easier to isolate yourself…there's no need to leave the house’ – a qualitative study on the paradoxes of online communication for parents with young children. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;83:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.040.
Radesky JS, Christakis DA. Increased screen time: implications for early childhood development and behavior. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63(5):827–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2016.06.006.
Graafland JH, OECD. New technologies and 21st century children: recent trends and outcomes OECD Education working paper no. 179 2018. https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/WKP%282018%2915/En/pdf.
Graham A, Sahlberg P. Growing Up Digital Australia: phase 2 technical report. 2021. https://www.gie.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/GONS5000%20Growing%20Up%20Digital%20Report_FINAL.pdf.
Drouin M, McDaniel BT, Pater J, Toscos T. How parents and their children used social media and technology at the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic and associations with anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020;23(11):727–736. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0284.
Trott M, Driscoll R, Irlado E, Pardhan S. Changes and correlates of screen time in adults and children during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;48:101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101452.
Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald‐Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199704)20:2<169::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-i.
Klem NR, Shields N, Smith A, Bunzli S. Demystifying qualitative research for musculoskeletal practitioners part 3: phenomeno‐what? Understanding what the qualitative researchers have done. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.10485.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psych. 2006;3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Klem NR, Shields N, Smith A, Bunzli S. Demystifying qualitative research for musculoskeletal practitioners part 4: a qualitative researcher's toolkit‐sampling, data collection methods, and data analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(1):8–10. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.10486.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Yardi S, Caldwell PHY, Barnes EH, Scott KM. Determining parents' patterns of behaviour when searching for online information on their child's health: parents searching for health information. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(11):1246–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14068.
Egmose I, Krogh MT, Stuart AC, Haase TW, Madsen EB, Væver MS. How are mothers negatively affected and supported by following parenting‐related Instagram profiles? A mixed‐methods study. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022;227:103593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103593.
Donelle L, Hall J, Hiebert B, Jackson K, Stoyanovich E, LaChance J, et al. Investigation of digital technology use in the transition to parenting: qualitative study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021;4(1):e25388. https://doi.org/10.2196/25388.
Pujolar G, Oliver‐Angles A, Vargas I, Vazquez ML. Changes in access to health services during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031749.
El Sherif R, Pluye P, Schuster T, Grad R. Proxy information seeking by users of a parenting information website: quantitative observational study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022;5(1):e32406. https://doi.org/10.2196/32406.
Straker L, Edwards S, Kervin L, Burley J, Hendry D, Cliff D. Moving screen use guidelines: nine reasons why screen use guidelines should be separated from public health 24‐hour movement guidelines in Australia and internationally. Digital Child Working Paper 2023‐01. 2023 https://doi.org/10.26187/88f7-mf41.
Straker L, Zabatiero J, Danby S, Thorpe K, Edwards S. Conflicting guidelines on young Children's screen time and use of digital technology create policy and practice dilemmas. J Pediatr. 2018;202:300–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.019.
Processing Request
No Comments.