Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

A scoping review of wildfire smoke risk communications: issues, gaps, and recommendations.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Wildfire smoke exposure has become a growing public health concern, as megafires and fires at the wildland urban interface increase in incidence and severity. Smoke contains many pollutants that negatively impact health and is linked to a number of health complications and chronic diseases. Communicating effectively with the public, especially at-risk populations, to reduce their exposure to this environmental pollutant has become a public health priority. Although wildfire smoke risk communication research has also increased in the past decade, best practice guidance is limited, and most health communications do not adhere to health literacy principles: readability, accessibility, and actionability. This scoping review identifies peer-reviewed studies about wildfire smoke risk communications to identify gaps in research and evaluation of communications and programs that seek to educate the public.
      Methods: Four hundred fifty-one articles were identified from Web of Science and PubMed databases. After screening, 21 articles were included in the final sample for the abstraction process and qualitative thematic analysis. Ten articles were based in the US, with the other half in Australia, Canada, Italy, and other countries. Fifteen articles examined communication materials and messaging recommendations. Eight papers described communication delivery strategies. Eleven articles discussed behavior change. Six articles touched on risk communications for vulnerable populations; findings were limited and called for increasing awareness and prioritizing risk communications for at-risk populations.
      Results: This scoping review found limited studies describing behavior change to reduce wildfire smoke exposure, characteristics of effective communication materials and messaging, and communication delivery strategies. Literature on risk communications, dissemination, and behavior change for vulnerable populations was even more limited.
      Conclusions: Recommendations include providing risk communications that are easy-to-understand and adapted to specific needs of at-risk groups. Communications should provide a limited number of messages that include specific actions for avoiding smoke exposure. Effective communications should use mixed media formats and a wide variety of dissemination strategies. There is a pressing need for more intervention research and effectiveness evaluation of risk communications about wildfire smoke exposure, and more development and dissemination of risk communications for both the general public and vulnerable populations.
      (© 2024. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;27(6):607-614. (PMID: 32332485)
      Public Health Nurs. 2022 Mar;39(2):405-414. (PMID: 34636066)
      Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108518. (PMID: 31202044)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2):. (PMID: 33431571)
      JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jun 01;157(6):658-666. (PMID: 33881450)
      J Agromedicine. 2020 Jul;25(3):330-338. (PMID: 32043423)
      Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Sep;9(3):451-464. (PMID: 35633370)
      Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:120-32. (PMID: 25460628)
      Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Jul;114:103981. (PMID: 34020412)
      Lancet. 2014 May 3;383(9928):1581-92. (PMID: 24792855)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 06;16(13):. (PMID: 31284542)
      Lancet Planet Health. 2022 May;6(5):e400-e409. (PMID: 35550079)
      Citiz Sci. 2020 Jan 7;5(1):1-13. (PMID: 33014428)
      BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):41. (PMID: 34991532)
      Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:586-595. (PMID: 29272827)
      Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8:CD013441. (PMID: 34368949)
      Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):603-616. (PMID: 37851204)
      Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Sep;124(9):1334-43. (PMID: 27082891)
      West J Med. 2002 May;176(3):157-62. (PMID: 12016236)
      Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 02;8:465. (PMID: 32984250)
      Risk Anal. 2022 Nov;42(11):2536-2549. (PMID: 34569091)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;18(14):. (PMID: 34299914)
      Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Mar;11(1):46-60. (PMID: 38038861)
      Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):13963-13983. (PMID: 30891704)
      PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55614. (PMID: 23451029)
      Environ Res. 2024 Jan 15;241:117527. (PMID: 37931734)
      Risk Anal. 1995 Apr;15(2):137-45. (PMID: 7597253)
      Can J Public Health. 2018 Jun;109(3):327-337. (PMID: 29981098)
      BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Oct;7(1):. (PMID: 37865399)
      Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2188-95. (PMID: 19833990)
      Inhal Toxicol. 2016;28(3):95-139. (PMID: 26915822)
      Environ Manage. 2014 Sep;54(3):571-82. (PMID: 25034752)
      J Health Commun. 2012;17(6):698-712. (PMID: 22494384)
      Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):e579-e587. (PMID: 34508679)
      Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Feb;34(1):24-31. (PMID: 20920101)
      Environ Int. 2019 Mar;124:180-204. (PMID: 30654326)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 16;18(20):. (PMID: 34682636)
      PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0205825. (PMID: 30388129)
      BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. (PMID: 30453902)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;19(19):. (PMID: 36231731)
      Environ Int. 2017 Mar;100:1-31. (PMID: 27881237)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 08;18(16):. (PMID: 34444135)
      J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;31(1):1-20. (PMID: 32952154)
      Inhal Toxicol. 2010 Feb;22(2):113-6. (PMID: 20041806)
      Risk Anal. 2000 Oct;20(5):713-9. (PMID: 11110217)
      Environ Int. 2021 Nov;156:106644. (PMID: 34030071)
      J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:9-19. (PMID: 20845189)
      Rev Environ Health. 2021 Mar 16;36(4):599-609. (PMID: 33721920)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):. (PMID: 34073399)
      J Environ Manage. 2017 May 15;193:247-256. (PMID: 28226261)
      Front Public Health. 2020 May 05;8:143. (PMID: 32432070)
    • Grant Information:
      84023901-0 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 84023901-0 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 84023901-0 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 84023901-0 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 84023901-0 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Communications dissemination; Health literacy; Risk communication; Smoke exposure; Vulnerable populations; Wildfire smoke
    • الرقم المعرف:
      0 (Smoke)
      0 (Environmental Pollutants)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20240127 Date Completed: 20240129 Latest Revision: 20241023
    • الموضوع:
      20241023
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC10822163
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12889-024-17681-0
    • الرقم المعرف:
      38281022