Assembling a population health management maturity index using a Delphi method.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

Population Health Management* ; Population Health*; Humans ; Delphi Technique ; Ethnicity ; Data Collection

Background: Although local initiatives commonly express a wish to improve population health and wellbeing using a population health management (PHM) approach, implementation is challenging and existing tools have either a narrow focus or lack transparency. This has created demand for practice-oriented guidance concerning the introduction and requirements of PHM.
Methods: Existing knowledge from scientific literature was combined with expert opinion obtained using an adjusted RAND UCLA appropriateness method, which consisted of six Dutch panels in three Delphi rounds, followed by two rounds of validation by an international panel.
Results: The Dutch panels identified 36 items relevant to PHM, in addition to the 97 items across six elements of PHM derived from scientific literature. Of these 133 items, 101 were considered important and 32 ambiguous. The international panel awarded similar scores for 128 of 133 items, with only 5 items remaining unvalidated. Combining literature and expert opinion gave extra weight and validity to the items.
Discussion: In developing a maturity index to help assess the use and progress of PHM in health regions, input from experts counterbalanced a previous skewedness of item distribution across the PHM elements and the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC). Participant expertise also improved our understanding of successful PHM implementation, as well as how the six PHM elements are best constituted in a first iteration of a maturity index. Limitations included the number of participants in some panels and ambiguity of language. Further development should focus on item clarity, adoption in practice and item interconnectedness.
Conclusion: By employing scientific literature enriched with expert opinion, this study provides new insight for both science and practice concerning the composition of PHM elements that influence PHM implementation. This will help guide practices in their quest to implement PHM.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):63. (PMID: 30885141)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 26;20(1):358. (PMID: 32336288)
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):446-492. (PMID: 32436330)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 20;13:528. (PMID: 24359610)
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 May 20;14:63-70. (PMID: 35634010)
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022 Sep-Oct 01;28(5):442-444. (PMID: 35727912)
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 28;16(4):6. (PMID: 28316546)
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020 Jul;25(3):187-201. (PMID: 32178546)
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;28(4 Suppl 4):S118-S121. (PMID: 35616555)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):910. (PMID: 37626327)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69. (PMID: 18474969)
Health Policy. 2018 Jan;122(1):12-22. (PMID: 28668222)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):923. (PMID: 35850683)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):1964-1969. (PMID: 27834234)
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010. (PMID: 23687482)
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Nov 30;22(4):15. (PMID: 36483482)
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):753. (PMID: 33874927)
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Sep 15;74(18):1405-1411. (PMID: 28887342)
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. (PMID: 25384822)
BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625-8. (PMID: 11557716)

Keywords: Expert opinion; Implementation; Maturity; Population Health Management

Date Created: 20240119 Date Completed: 20240122 Latest Revision: 20240122

20240122

PMC10799527

10.1186/s12913-024-10572-5

38243278