Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Biomechanical study of posterior cruciate ligament tibial arrest avulsion fracture fixation with triple tibial channel net sutures.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      To investigate the biomechanical properties of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibia fixed using four different methods, including triple tibial channel net suture fixation. In 40 porcine knees, a standardized bony avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament was generated. Double tibial bone channel suture fixation was performed in group A, double-head hollow compression screw fixation was performed in group B, triple tibial bone channel net suture fixation was performed in group C, and cortical suspension EndoButton fixation was performed in group D. The constructs were cyclically loaded 500 times (10 to 100 N) to measure the initial displacement and stiffness values. Subsequently, loading to failure was performed, and the yield load and peak load were measured. The results were analysed by one-way ANOVA, with significance set at P < 0.05. The initial displacement in group D (1.00 ± 0.20 mm) was lower than that in group C (1.46 ± 0.33 mm, P = 0.000), group B (1.91 ± 1.71 mm, P = 0.000) and group A (3.91 ± 0.79 mm, P = 0.000), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P = 0.055). The initial stiffness in group A (50.59 ± 6.89 N/mm) was lower than that in group C (67.21 ± 12.80 N/mm, P = 0.001), group D (71.18 ± 9.20 N/mm, P = 0.000) and group B (78.67 ± 5.91 N/mm, P = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference between groups B and D or between groups C and D (P = 0.111 and P = 0.391). The yield load in group A (554.86 ± 71.43 N) was lower than that in group C (767.00 ± 34.53 N, P = 0.000), group D (777.62 ± 73.03 N, P = 0.000) and group B (837.50 ± 55.73 N, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference between groups C and D (P = 0.729). The peak load in group A (667.38 ± 61.54 N) was lower than that in group C (842.00 ± 26.20 N, P = 0.000), group D (867.63 ± 63.42 N, P = 0.000) and group B (901.25 ± 54.38 N, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference between groups C and D (P = 0.346). Different failure modes were found among the four groups. The triple tibial bone channel suture fixation group showed better initial stability and fixation strength, which was comparable to that in the cortical suspension EndoButton fixation group and double-head hollow compression screw fixation group and significantly stronger than that in the double tibial bone channel suture fixation group. This study analysed the dynamic and static indexes of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures fixed by four different fixation methods under cyclic loading tests and single failure loading tests, providing a theoretical basis for clinical treatment.
      (© 2023. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10):1197-201. (PMID: 16226647)
      Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):404-10. (PMID: 17170161)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Oct;20(10):2092-7. (PMID: 22203047)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1269-1275. (PMID: 32712684)
      Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):681-7. (PMID: 22284410)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Feb;20(2):315-21. (PMID: 21761230)
      BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 11;23(1):143. (PMID: 35148737)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Mar;26(3):912-918. (PMID: 27681893)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1251-1257. (PMID: 32712683)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):664-70. (PMID: 22527419)
      Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):765-71. (PMID: 15090395)
      Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017 Dec 1;29(4):316-320. (PMID: 29172392)
      BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):15. (PMID: 34980065)
      J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Dec;92 Suppl 6:S181-8. (PMID: 20120683)
      Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Feb;24(2):209-16. (PMID: 23412317)
      Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):503-509. (PMID: 29869136)
      Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Apr;107(2):102798. (PMID: 33340707)
      Injury. 2021 Mar;52(3):594-601. (PMID: 33023741)
      Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jul 23;9(6):293-301. (PMID: 32728430)
      Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1065-71. (PMID: 26775734)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 May;20(5):996-9. (PMID: 22009556)
      J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968 May;50(2):334-41. (PMID: 5651340)
      Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2972-8. (PMID: 25315993)
      Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Feb;31(1):3-11. (PMID: 30564842)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Sep;18(9):1277-81. (PMID: 20407757)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003 Sep;11(5):297-306. (PMID: 12942234)
      Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jan;140(1):59-65. (PMID: 31559489)
      Arthroscopy. 2007 Nov;23(11):1226-30. (PMID: 17986411)
      J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959 Mar;41-A(2):209-20; discussion 220-2. (PMID: 13630956)
      Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1470-8. (PMID: 21987363)
    • Grant Information:
      2023KFKT024 State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Medical Engineering
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20231227 Date Completed: 20231229 Latest Revision: 20231230
    • الموضوع:
      20231231
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC10752874
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1038/s41598-023-50479-5
    • الرقم المعرف:
      38151505