Associations between rurality and regional differences in sociodemographic factors and the 1918-20 influenza and 2020-21 COVID-19 pandemics in Missouri counties: An ecological study.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Rural Population* ; Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919*/mortality ; COVID-19*/mortality ; Pandemics*; Sociodemographic Factors ; Humans ; Missouri/epidemiology ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Healthcare Disparities ; Geographic Locations ; Health Services Accessibility

This study compares pandemic experiences of Missouri's 115 counties based on rurality and sociodemographic characteristics during the 1918-20 influenza and 2020-21 COVID-19 pandemics. The state's counties and overall population distribution have remained relatively stable over the last century, which enables identification of long-lasting pandemic attributes. Sociodemographic data available at the county level for both time periods were taken from U.S. census data and used to create clusters of similar counties. Counties were also grouped by rural status (RSU), including fully (100%) rural, semirural (1-49% living in urban areas), and urban (>50% of the population living in urban areas). Deaths from 1918 through 1920 were collated from the Missouri Digital Heritage database and COVID-19 cases and deaths were downloaded from the Missouri COVID-19 dashboard. Results from sociodemographic analyses indicate that, during both time periods, average farm value, proportion White, and literacy were the most important determinants of sociodemographic clusters. Furthermore, the Urban/Central and Southeastern regions experienced higher mortality during both pandemics than did the North and South. Analyses comparing county groups by rurality indicated that throughout the 1918-20 influenza pandemic, urban counties had the highest and rural had the lowest mortality rates. Early in the 2020-21 COVID-19 pandemic, urban counties saw the most extensive epidemic spread and highest mortality, but as the epidemic progressed, cumulative mortality became highest in semirural counties. Additional results highlight the greater effects both pandemics had on county groups with lower rates of education and a lower proportion of Whites in the population. This was especially true for the far southeastern counties of Missouri ("the Bootheel") during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results indicate that rural-urban and socioeconomic differences in health outcomes are long-standing problems that continue to be of significant importance, even though the overall quality of health care is substantially better in the 21st century.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2023 Sattenspiel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1267-1272. (PMID: 34111372)
J Rural Health. 2021 Mar;37(2):272-277. (PMID: 33619806)
J Infect Dis. 2013 Mar 1;207(5):721-9. (PMID: 23230061)
Mo Med. 2018 May-Jun;115(3):183-188. (PMID: 30228714)
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;187(12):2511-2523. (PMID: 30124746)
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009 May;3(3):99-106. (PMID: 19453486)
Mo Med. 2022 May-Jun;119(3):176-184. (PMID: 36035578)
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:16-20. (PMID: 33894385)
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 May;28(5):273-280. (PMID: 29361358)
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Aug 18;151(33-34):. (PMID: 34407365)
Health Place. 2022 Mar;74:102744. (PMID: 35114614)
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):e78. (PMID: 32795410)
Respirology. 2021 Sep;26(9):840-841. (PMID: 34180106)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 12;16(14):. (PMID: 31336864)
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246548. (PMID: 33534870)
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:67-70. (PMID: 32599281)
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):321. (PMID: 35168588)
Vital Health Stat 2. 2014 Apr;(166):1-73. (PMID: 24776070)
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 09;8(3):. (PMID: 32917009)
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2017527. (PMID: 32789512)
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 16;17:E64. (PMID: 32678060)
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jun;111(6):1086-1094. (PMID: 33950739)
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;23(5):479-83. (PMID: 16961567)
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 7;21(1):432. (PMID: 33962563)
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0274899. (PMID: 36170339)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;12(1):15-22. (PMID: 16494711)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;15(10):1617-9. (PMID: 19861055)
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Oct 12;23:4880-4884. (PMID: 29021518)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;20(11):1803-11. (PMID: 25341056)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 01;18(21):. (PMID: 34770012)
PLoS Curr. 2011 Nov 17;2:RRN1287. (PMID: 22183018)
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):416-422. (PMID: 33476227)
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):430-437. (PMID: 33566641)
Public Health Rep (1896). 1963 Jun;78(6):494-506. (PMID: 19316455)
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:630449. (PMID: 33912529)
J Rural Health. 2020 Jun;36(3):446-456. (PMID: 32543751)
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):e238-e244. (PMID: 32628905)
Health Place. 2002 Mar;8(1):25-35. (PMID: 11852261)
Mo Hist Rev. 1968;63:55-70. (PMID: 11614965)
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Aug;137(8):1062-72. (PMID: 19215637)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 5;118(1):. (PMID: 33328335)
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Mar 09;:1-24. (PMID: 35260205)

Date Created: 20230830 Date Completed: 20231004 Latest Revision: 20231004

20231005

PMC10468050

10.1371/journal.pone.0290294

37647267