A biological invasion reduces rates of cannibalism by Japanese toad tadpoles.

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-

Bufo marinus* ; Cannibalism*; Animals ; Australia ; Larva ; Japan

Biological invasions can favour rapid changes in intraspecific competitive mechanisms such as cannibalism by imposing novel evolutionary pressures. For example, cane toad (Rhinella marina) tadpoles are highly cannibalistic on eggs and hatchlings in their invasive range in Australia, but not in their native range in South America. Whether such changes in cannibalism occur in invasive populations of other amphibian species is unknown. To explore this question, we collected wild-laid egg clutches of Japanese common toads (Bufo japonicus) from native and invasive populations in Japan, and conducted laboratory experiments to examine cannibalism responses. Contrary to the Australian system, we found that invasion has been accompanied by reduced cannibalistic tendency of B. japonicus tadpoles. This reduction has occurred despite invasive-range B. japonicus eggs/hatchlings being more vulnerable than native-range B. japonicus eggs/hatchlings to cannibalism by native-range conspecific tadpoles, and to predation by native-range frog tadpoles. Our findings thus support the idea that biological invasions can generate rapid changes in rates of cannibalism, but also show that decreases as well as increases can occur. Future work could investigate the proximate cues and selective forces responsible for this rapid decrease in rates of cannibalism by tadpoles in an invasive B. japonicus population.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)

Cladistics. 2003 Feb;19(1):23-89. (PMID: 34905866)
Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):308-9. (PMID: 10634786)
Am Nat. 2008 Mar;171(3):E134-48. (PMID: 18271722)
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63. (PMID: 18481363)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35):. (PMID: 34426494)
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):288-94. (PMID: 18467157)
Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:39-53. (PMID: 19961322)
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 7;279(1742):3436-42. (PMID: 22696528)
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 11;10(23):13071-13079. (PMID: 33304517)
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10. (PMID: 21560670)
Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr 26;9(11):6287-6299. (PMID: 31236221)
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 01;12(3):e8655. (PMID: 35261745)
BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Feb 05;14:15. (PMID: 24495338)
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 15;11(1):12527. (PMID: 34131171)
Ecol Lett. 2014 May;17(5):637-49. (PMID: 24612028)
Mol Ecol. 2015 May;24(9):2264-76. (PMID: 25894012)
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 22;11(9):e0156950. (PMID: 27658247)
J Chem Ecol. 2009 Apr;35(4):391-9. (PMID: 19263169)
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1627. (PMID: 35102170)
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Oct 25;4(10):170789. (PMID: 29134082)
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jul 12;4(7):170517. (PMID: 28791174)
J Chem Ecol. 2020 Oct;46(10):997-1009. (PMID: 32996040)

Date Created: 20230613 Date Completed: 20230621 Latest Revision: 20230628

20250114

PMC10264391

10.1038/s41598-023-36743-8

37311915