Confronting historical legacies of biological anthropology in South Africa-Restitution, redress and community-centered science: The Sutherland Nine.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Anthropology* ; Archaeology*; Humans ; South Africa ; Cemeteries ; DNA, Ancient

We describe a process of restitution of nine unethically acquired human skeletons to their families, together with attempts at redress. Between 1925-1927 C.E., the skeletonised remains of nine San or Khoekhoe people, eight of them known-in-life, were removed from their graves on the farm Kruisrivier, near Sutherland in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. They were donated to the Anatomy Department at the University of Cape Town. This was done without the knowledge or permission of their families. The donor was a medical student who removed the remains from the labourers' cemetery on his family farm. Nearly 100 years later, the remains are being returned to their community, accompanied by a range of community-driven interdisciplinary historical, archaeological and analytical (osteobiographic, craniofacial, ancient DNA, stable isotope) studies to document, as far as possible, their lives and deaths. The restitution process began by contacting families living in the same area with the same surnames as the deceased. The restitution and redress process prioritises the descendant families' memories, wishes and desire to understand the situation, and learn more about their ancestors. The descendant families have described the process as helping them to reconnect with their ancestors. A richer appreciation of their ancestors' lives, gained in part from scientific analyses, culminating with reburial, is hoped to aid the descendant families and wider community in [re-]connecting with their heritage and culture, and contribute to restorative justice, reconciliation and healing while confronting a traumatic historical moment. While these nine individuals were exhumed as specimens, they will be reburied as people.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest.
(Copyright: © 2023 Gibbon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

J Genocide Res. 2010;12(1-2):19-44. (PMID: 20941880)
Ann Hum Biol. 2015;42(4):407-14. (PMID: 26225904)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Feb;129(2):311-7. (PMID: 16323185)
Homo. 2021 Jun 25;72(2):139-147. (PMID: 33821871)
Bioarchaeol Int. 2019;3(1):1-15. (PMID: 32467863)
Nature. 2015 Jun 11;522(7555):207-11. (PMID: 25731166)
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011 Jan;21(1):49-56. (PMID: 21431034)
Genetics. 2012 Nov;192(3):1065-93. (PMID: 22960212)
Science. 2017 Nov 3;358(6363):652-655. (PMID: 28971970)
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1002967. (PMID: 23166502)
Semin Plast Surg. 2012 May;26(2):53-63. (PMID: 23633932)
Cell. 2017 Sep 21;171(1):59-71.e21. (PMID: 28938123)
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;33(1):70-75. (PMID: 34260447)
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64. (PMID: 19648217)
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195491. (PMID: 29684051)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Jul;142(3):481-90. (PMID: 20310064)
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2016 Aug;20(8):49. (PMID: 27344347)
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:164-170. (PMID: 27890751)
PLoS Genet. 2006 Dec;2(12):e190. (PMID: 17194218)
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Nov;21(11):645-647. (PMID: 32939074)
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1138:87-101. (PMID: 31313260)

0 (DNA, Ancient)

Date Created: 20230524 Date Completed: 20230526 Latest Revision: 20230605

20230606

PMC10208512

10.1371/journal.pone.0284785

37224187