نبذة مختصرة : The EU chemical strategy for sustainability (CSS) plans to use chemical grouping to "prioritise (…) substances for restrictions for all uses through grouping, instead of regulating them one by one". Thus, toxicological grouping will become a key tool used by regulatory authorities in Europe. Over the last 2 years, ECHA has published a high number of documents labelled "Assessment of Regulatory Needs (ARN)" which are based on groups of chemicals based on structural considerations. The ARN documents are legally non-binding, yet they present the public impression of a conclusion about restrictions for groups or sub-groups of chemicals and hence may set a precedent for further binding actions. ECHA has set out definitions on what is considered a group in REACH Annex XI. However, as shown in this commentary based on five examples, the ARN do not follow these principles and propose toxicological groupings without taking into consideration mode of action and the toxicological information on the chemicals. Given the emphasis on grouping projected by the CSS, the groupings in the ARN set an unfortunate precedent on what a toxicological group means and they do not follow clear scientific standards or established toxicological principles. They also lead to a public image of guilt by association for chemicals, without any recourse for registrants to establish the scientific basis for their safe use, as presented within REACH registrations.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
References: Andrews BAK (1987) 1,3,-Dioxolane, an alternative to formalin as a standard for formaldehyde. Text Res J 57(12):705–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051758705701205. (PMID: 10.1177/004051758705701205)
Aubert N, Ameller T, Legrand JJ (2012) Systemic exposure to parabens: pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, excretion balance and plasma metabolites of [14C]-methyl-, propyl- and butylparaben in rats after oral, topical or subcutaneous administration. Food Chem Toxicol 50(3–4):445–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.045. (PMID: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.04522265941)
Czech_republic. (2016). Substance evaluation conclusion document as required by REACH Article 48 for 4-hydroxybenzoic acid EC No 202–804–9 CAS No 99–96–7. Retrieved from https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/39c35c2a-f449-e6b7-a7ba-2d84ea8b2951 . Accessed 26 Jan 2023.
DK-EPA. (2020). Butyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (Butylparaben). Proposal for identification of a substance of very high concern on the basis of the criteria set out in reach article 57. Retrieved from https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/b2bffd83-88a7-6a89-3943-65924de8d475 . Accessed 20 Dec 2022.
ECHA. (2022a). 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propionaldehyde, registry of intentions. Retrieved from https://www.echa.europa.eu/fr/registry-of-clh-intentions-until-outcome/-/dislist/details/0b0236e18782d5dd . Accessed 20 Dec 2022.
ECHA. (2022b). methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, Registration dossier. Retrieved from https://www.echa.europa.eu/de/brief-profile/-/briefprofile/100.002.532 . Accessed 20 Dec 2022.
European_Commission. (2020). Chemicals strategy: The EU’s chemicals strategy for sustainability towards a toxic-free environment. Retrieved from https://www.ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/chemicals-strategy_en . Accessed 20 Dec 2022.
Laue H, Kern S, Badertscher RP, Ellis G, Natsch A (2017) p-Alkyl-benzoyl-CoA conjugates as relevant metabolites of aromatic aldehydes with rat testicular toxicity—studies leading to the design of a safer new fragrance chemical. Tox Sci 160(2):244–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfx178. (PMID: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx178)
Moustakas H, Date MS, Kumar M, Schultz TW, Liebler DC, Penning TM, Api AM (2022) An end point-specific framework for read-across analog selection for human health effects. Chem Res Toxicol 35(12):2324–2334. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00286. (PMID: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00286364589079768807)
Pop A, Drugan T, Gutleb AC, Lupu D, Cherfan J, Loghin F, Kiss B (2018) Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity of butylparaben, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene and propyl gallate and their binary mixtures on two estrogen responsive cell lines (T47D-Kbluc, MCF-7). J Appl Toxicol 38(7):944–957. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3601. (PMID: 10.1002/jat.360129460325)
Wohlleben W, Mehling A, Landsiedel R (2022) Lessons learned from the grouping of chemicals to assess risks to human health. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202210651. (PMID: 10.1002/anie.20221065136254879)
Processing Request
No Comments.