Livelihood Diversification and Residents' Welfare: Evidence from Maasai Mara National Reserve.

Publisher: MDPI Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101238455 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1660-4601 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16604601 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Environ Res Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Basel : MDPI, c2004-

Family Characteristics* ; Poverty*; Animals ; Humans ; Farms ; Conservation of Natural Resources/methods ; Livestock

The contradiction between environmental protection and livelihood development is becoming increasingly serious for most protected areas in developing countries. Livelihood diversification is an efficient way to increase household income to alleviate poverty related to environmental protection. However, its impacts on household welfare in protected areas have rarely been quantitatively explored. This article investigates the determinants of four livelihood strategies in the Maasai Mara National Reserve and explores the association between livelihood diversification and household income and its heterogeneities. Based on the sustainable livelihoods framework and the information collected from 409 households through face-to-face interviews, this study adopted multivariate regression models to obtain consistent results. Results show that the determinants of the four strategies differed. Natural capital, physical capital, and financial capital had significant associations with the probability of adopting the strategy of livestock breeding. Physical capital, financial capital, human capital, and social capital were associated with the probability of adopting the joint strategy of livestock breeding and crop planting and the joint strategy of livestock breeding and off-farm activities. The probability of adopting the joint strategy of livestock breeding, crop planting, and off-farm activities was associated with all five kinds of livelihood capital except for financial capital. Diversification strategies, especially those involving off-farm activities, played greater roles in raising household income. The findings indicate that the government and management authority of Maasai Mara National Reserve should provide the households around the protected area with more off-farm employment opportunities to increase the welfare of local residents as well as to utilize natural resources appropriately, especially for those located far away from the protected area.

Glob Environ Change. 2013 Jun;23(3):588-597. (PMID: 25400331)
Environ Manage. 2019 Jul;64(1):52-63. (PMID: 31079170)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):. (PMID: 36141794)
J Environ Manage. 2018 Dec 15;228:1-12. (PMID: 30205240)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681):. (PMID: 26460122)
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 21;8(12):e12502. (PMID: 36590543)
J Environ Manage. 2015 Dec 1;164:96-103. (PMID: 26363256)
J Rural Stud. 2013 Oct 1;32:126-136. (PMID: 24043919)
Conserv Biol. 2014 Jun;28(3):841-50. (PMID: 24476123)
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0170796. (PMID: 28135338)
J Environ Manage. 2011 Jan;92(1):156-64. (PMID: 20843597)
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:110133. (PMID: 32090829)

Keywords: Maasai Mara National Reserve; income; livelihood diversification; off-farm activities; strategies

Date Created: 20230311 Date Completed: 20230314 Latest Revision: 20230420

20240829

PMC10001152

10.3390/ijerph20053859

36900869