Too strong to care? Investigating the links between formidability, worldviews, and views on climate and disaster .

Publisher: Association for Politics and the Life Sciences Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8800535 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-5457 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07309384 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Politics Life Sci Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: Logan, UT : Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
Original Publication: DeKalb, Ill. : The Association, [c1982]-

Men* ; Disasters*; Male ; Humans ; Floods ; Climate Change ; Empathy

People vary in climate change skepticism and in their views on disaster cause and prevention. For example, the United States boasts higher rates of climate skepticism than other countries, especially among Republicans. Research into the individual differences that shape variation in climate-related beliefs represents an important opportunity for those seeking ways to mitigate climate change and climate-related disasters (e.g., floods). In this registered report, we proposed a study examining how individual difference in physical formidability, worldview, and affect relate to attitudes about disaster and climate change. We predicted that highly formidable men would tend to endorse social inequality, hold status quo defensive worldviews, report lower levels of empathy, and report attitudes that promote disaster risk accumulation via lesser support for social intervention. The results of an online study (Study 1) support the notion that men's self-perceived formidability is related to disaster and climate change beliefs in the predicted direction and that this relationship is mediated by hierarchical worldview and status quo defense but not empathy. An analysis of a preliminary sample for the in-lab study (Study 2) suggests that self-perceived formidability relates to disaster views, climate views, and status quo maintaining worldviews.

Arnocky, S., & Stroink, M. (2010). Gender differences in environmentalism: The mediating role of emotional empathy. Current Research in Social Psychology , 16, Article 9.
Barclay, P., & Barker, J. L. (2020). Greener than thou: People who protect the environment are more cooperative, compete to be environmental, and benefit from reputation. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 72, 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101441.
Bell, J., Poushter, J., Fagan, M., & Huang, C. (2021, September 14). In response to climate change, citizens in advanced economies are willing to alter how they live and work . Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/09/14/in-response-to-climate-change-citizens-in-advanced-economies-are-willing-to-alter-how-they-live-and-work/.
Benegal, S. D. (2018). The spillover of race and racial attitudes into public opinion about climate change. Environmental Politics , 27(4), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1457287.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, R., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters . Routledge.
Bosson, J. K., & Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 20(2), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669.
Brown, M., Chua, K. J., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2021). Formidability and socioeconomic status uniquely predict militancy and political moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences , 168, 110284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110284.
Brown, M., Sacco, D. F., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (in press). Physical strength as a heuristic cue of political conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences .
Bush, S. S., & Clayton, A. (2022). Facing change: Gender and climate change attitudes worldwide. American Political Science Review . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000752.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review , 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 22 (2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001818.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Climate effects on health . Retrieved April 21 ^st 2021 from https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/effects/default.htm.
Cheek, W., & Chmutina, K. (2022). “Building back better” is neoliberal post-disaster reconstruction. Disasters , 46(3), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12502.
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods , 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343.
Clifton, J. D. W., Baker, J. D., Park, C. L., Yaden, D. B., Clifton, A. B. W., Terni, P., Miller, J. L., Zeng, G., Giorgi, S., Schwartz, H. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Primal world beliefs. Psychological Assessment , 31(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000639.
Colvin, V. E., Prokosch, M. L., von Meding, J., Chmutina, K., & Smith, C. T. (2022). Individual differences in blame and risk reduction related to disasters . Manuscript under review.
Conlon, K. E., & Rose, P. (2017). Transparency for the public good: When feeling powerful does and does not affect willingness to sacrifice for the environment. The Journal of General Psychology , 144(3), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2017.1299676.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 44, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
Dixon, G., Bullock, O., & Adams, D. (2019). Unintended effects of emphasizing the role of climate change in recent natural disasters. Environmental Communication , 13(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1546202.
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change , 9(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1.
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality , 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x.
Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M., & Yarosh, J. H. (2016). The Political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development , 58(5), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995.
Durkee, P. K., Goetz, A. T., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2018). Formidability assessment mechanisms: Examining their speed and automaticity. Evolution and Human Behavior , 39(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.006.
Durkee, P. K., Lukaszewski, A. W., & Buss, D. M. (2020). Psychological foundations of human status allocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 117(35), 21235–21241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006148117.
Eisenbruch, A. B., Grillot, R. L., Maestripieri, D., & Roney, J. R. (2016). Evidence of partner choice heuristics in a one-shot bargaining game. Evolution and Human Behavior , 37(6), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.002.
Fagan, M., & Huang, C. (2019, April 18). A look at how people around the world view climate change . Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/18/a-look-at-how-people-around-the-world-view-climate-change/.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods , 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 36(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435.
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist , 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.
Goldsmith, R. E., Feygina, I., & Jost, J. T. (2013). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: A system justification perspective. In M. Alston & K. Whittenbury (Eds.), Research, action and policy: Addressing the gendered impacts of climate change (pp. 159–171). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5_12.
Häkkinen, K., & Akrami, N. (2014). Ideology and climate change denial. Personality and Individual Differences , 70, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.030.
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior , 38(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013916505277998.
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., … Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO 7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033.
Hornsey, M. J. (2021). >The role of worldviews in shaping how people appraise climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , 42, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.021.
Hudson, S. K. T. J., Cikara, M., & Sidanius, J. (2019). Preference for hierarchy is associated with reduced empathy and increased counter-empathy towards others, especially out-group targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 85, 103871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103871.
Jacobs, F. (2021). Beyond social vulnerability: COVID-19 as a disaster of racial capitalism. Sociologica , 15(1), 55–65.
Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior , 25, 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4.
Jylhä, K. M., & Akrami, N. (2015). Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification. Personality and Individual Differences , 86, 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.041.
Jylhä, K. M., Cantal, C., Akrami, N., & Milfont, T. L. (2016). Denial of anthropogenic climate change: Social dominance orientation helps explain the conservative male effect in Brazil and Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences , 98, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.020.
Jylhä, K. M., Tam, K.-P., & Milfont, T. L. (2021). Acceptance of group-based dominance and climate change denial: A cross-cultural study in Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Sweden. Asian Journal of Social Psychology , 24(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12444.
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P. & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the White-Male Effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies , 4(3), 465–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17401461.2007.00097.x.
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823.
Kerry, N., & Murray, D. (2018). Strong personalities: Investigating the relationships between grip strength, self-perceived formidability, and Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences , 131, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.003.
Kerry, N., & Murray, D. R. (2019). Is formidability associated with political conservatism? Evolutionary Psychological Science , 5 (2), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0181-5.
Kerry, N., & Murray, D. R. (2021). Physical strength partly explains sex differences in trait anxiety in young Americans. Psychological Science , 32(5), 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620971298.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Krems, J. A., Merrie, L. A., Short, V., Duarte, K., Rodriguez, N. N., French, J. E., Sznycer, D., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2022). Third-party perceptions of male and female status: Male physical strength and female physical attractiveness cue high status. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution , 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.860797.
Li, Z., & Edwards, J. A. (2021). The relationship between system justification and perspective-taking and empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 47(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220921041.
Lizarralde, G., Bornstein, L., Robertson, M., Gould, K., Herazo, B., Petter, A. M., … & Bouchereau, K. (2021). Does climate change cause disasters? How citizens, academics, and leaders explain climate-related risk and disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction , 58, 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102173.
Lucas, T., Zhdanova, L., & Alexander, S. (2011). Procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others: Assessment of a four-factor individual differences model. Journal of Individual Differences , 32(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000032.
Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 110(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000042.
MacInnis, B., & Krosnick, J. (2020). Climate insights 2020: Natural disasters. Surveying American public opinion on Climate Change and the environment (Report 20-10). Resources for the Future. https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/climateinsights2020-natural-disasters/.
Manson, J. H., Chua, K. J., Rodriguez, N. N., Barlev, M., Durkee, P. K., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2022). Sex differences in fearful personality traits are mediated by physical strength. Social Psychological and Personality Science . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221094086.
Marjanovic, Z., Struthers, C. W., & Greenglass, E. R. (2012). Who helps natural-disaster victims? Assessment of trait and situational predictors. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy , 12(1), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15302415.2011.01262.x.
McCright, A. M., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., Shwom, R. L., Brechin, S. R., & Allen, S. (2016). Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science , 21, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003.
Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Polo, P., Valenzuela, N., Pavez, P., Ramírez-Herrera, O., Figueroa, O., Rodriguez-Sickert, C., Díaz, D., & Pita, M. (2020). The male warrior hypothesis: Testosterone-related cooperation and aggression in the context of intergroup conflict. Scientific Reports , 10(1), Article 375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57259-0.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user's guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
National Centers for Environmental Information. (2021). Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: Overview . National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved April 21 ^st, 2021 from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/.
Petersen, M. B., & Dawes, C. T. (2017). Assessing causal pathways between physical formidability and aggression in human males. Personality and Individual Differences , 113, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.022.
Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2019). Upper-body strength and political egalitarianism: Twelve conceptual replications. Political Psychology , 40(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12505.
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2012). Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology , 33(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00883.x.
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Sell, A., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). The ancestral logic of politics: Upper-body strength regulates men's assertion of self-interest over economic redistribution. Psychological Science , 24(7), 1098–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466415.
Pfattheicher, S., Nockur, L., Böhm, R., Sassenrath, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2020). The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science , 31(11), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620964422.
Prati, F., Pratto, F., Zeineddine, F., Sweetman, J., Aiello, A., Petrović, N., & Rubini, M. (2022). From social dominance orientation to political engagement: The role of group status and shared beliefs in politics across multiple contexts. Political Psychology , 43(1), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12745.
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology , 36(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x.
Price, M. E., Brown, S., Dukes, A., & Kang, J. (2015). Bodily attractiveness and egalitarianism are negatively related in males. Evolutionary Psychology , 13(1), 147470491501300100. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300109.
Price, M. E., Kang, J., Dunn, J., & Hopkins, S. (2011). Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism. Personality and Individual Differences , 50(5), 636–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.009.
Price, M. E., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Sidnaius, J., & Pound, N. (2017). Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men? Evolution and Human Behavior , 38(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.001.
Richardson, T. (2021). Height is associated with more self-serving beliefs about wealth redistribution. Evolution and Human Behavior , 42(4), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.12.001.
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass , 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519004.2011.00355.x.
Santos, J. F., & Feygina, I. (2017). Responding to climate change skepticism and the ideological divide. Michigan Journal of Sustainability , 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/mjs.12333712.0005.102.
Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 276 (1656), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1177.
Sell, A., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016). Bargaining power and adolescent aggression: The role of fighting ability, coalitional strength, and mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior , 37(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.003.
Sell, A., Hone, L. S. E., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature , 23(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2.
Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 284(1869), 20171819. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819.
Sell, A., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Krauss, A., Nisu, S., Ceapa, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). Physically strong men are more militant: A test across four countries. Evolution and Human Behavior , 38(3), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.11.002.
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106.
Shao, W. (2017). Weather, climate, politics, or God? Determinants of American public opinions toward global warming. Environmental Politics , 26(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1223190.
Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You're inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality , 81(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67(6), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998.
Smith, A. B. (2021, January 8). 2020U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in historical context . Climate.gov. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2020-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate-disasters-historical.
Soper, D. (2021). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models . Free Statistics Calculators. Retrieved from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89.
Stanley, S. K., & Wilson, M. S. (2019). Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 61, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.002.
Thomas, D. S. K., Jang, S., & Scandlyn, J. (2020). The CHASMS conceptual model of cascading disasters and social vulnerability: The COVID-19 case example. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction , 51, 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101828.
Thomas, D. S. K., Phillips, B. D., Fothergill, A., & Blinn-Pike, L. (Eds.). (2009). Social vulnerability to disasters . CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781420078572.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030 . Retrieved from https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030.
Urbatsch, R. (2021). Physical formidability and acceptance of police violence. Evolution and Human Behavior , 42(5), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.008.
U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2017). Climate science special report: Fourth National Climate Assessment (Vol. 1). https://science2017.globalchange.gov/.
Vandello, J., & Bosson, J. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity , 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826.
Vandello, J., Bosson, J., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R., & Weaver, J. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453.
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Human cooperation and the crises of climate Change, COVID-19, and misinformation. Annual Review of Psychology , 73, 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-110044.
Wang, Y. A., & Rhemtulla, M. (2021). Power analysis for parameter estimation in Structural Equation Modeling: A discussion and tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science , 4(1), 2515245920918253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918253.
Winter, N. J. G. (2010). Masculine Republicans and feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans' explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior , 32(4), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z.
Zanocco, C., Boudet, H., Nilson, R., Satein, H., Whitley, H., & Flora, J. (2018). Place, proximity, and perceived harm: Extreme weather events and views about climate change. Climatic Change , 149(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2251-x.
Zeng, T. C., Cheng, J. T., & Henrich, J. (2022). Dominance in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 377(1845), 20200451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0451.

Keywords: climate change; disaster risk; formidability; individual differences

Date Created: 20230307 Date Completed: 20230308 Latest Revision: 20230317

20240829

10.1017/pls.2022.20

36880545