Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Primary Health Care* ; Health Personnel*; Child ; Humans ; Female ; Brazil ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Internet ; Health Facilities

This study is a concordance analysis comparing answers to two external assessment tools for Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities that use two different data collection methodologies: (a) external assessment through structured interviews and direct observation of facilities conducted by the National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Primary Care (AE-PMAQ-AB), and (b) a computerized web-based self-administered questionnaire for Assessment of the Quality of Primary Health Care Services (QualiAB). The two surveys were answered by 1,898 facilities located in 437 municipalities in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, between 2017 and 2018. Both surveys aimed to assess the management and organization of PHC facilities. A total of 158 equivalent questions were identified. The answers were grouped by thematic similarity into nine domains: Territory characteristics; Local management and external support; Structure; Health promotion, disease prevention, and therapeutic procedures; Attention to unscheduled patients; Women's health; Children's health; Attention to chronic conditions; and Oral health. The results show a high level of concordance between the answers, with 81% of the 158 compared questions showing concordance higher than 0.700. We showed that the information obtained by the web-based survey QualiAB was comparable to that of the structured interview-based AE-PMAQ-AB, which is considered the gold standard. This is important because web-based surveys are more practical and convenient, and do not require trained interviewers. Online assessment surveys can allow immediate access to answers, reports and guidelines for each evaluated facility, as provided by the QualiAB system. In this way, the answers to this type of survey can be directly employed by users, allowing the assessment to fulfill all phases of an assessment process.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2023 Nunes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Eval Program Plann. 2016 Feb;54:11-8. (PMID: 26476859)
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Jun;25(suppl 1):2493-2497. (PMID: 32520294)
Eval Rev. 2009 Jun;33(3):226-56. (PMID: 18854493)
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 26;21(9):e14956. (PMID: 31573914)
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Oct 6;17(1):142. (PMID: 27716161)
Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 19;37(5):648-654. (PMID: 32297637)
Lancet. 2009 Jul 11;374(9684):170-3. (PMID: 19439350)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):426-9. (PMID: 10887170)
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240631. (PMID: 33057414)
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729. (PMID: 16279964)
Qual Quant. 2022;56(4):2341-2360. (PMID: 34493878)
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):831-65. (PMID: 12822915)
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 18;14(4):e0215429. (PMID: 30998795)
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. (PMID: 16202000)
J Ambul Care Manage. 2017 Apr/Jun;40 Suppl 2 Supplement, The Brazilian National Program for Improv:S4-S11. (PMID: 28252498)
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Nov 27;42:e151. (PMID: 31093179)
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 16;16(3):e0247101. (PMID: 33725008)
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 May;32(5):566-571. (PMID: 27943038)
Fam Pract. 2003 Oct;20(5):545-51. (PMID: 14507796)
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Jan 20;54:06. (PMID: 31967275)

Date Created: 20230202 Date Completed: 20230206 Latest Revision: 20230406

20250114

PMC9894387

10.1371/journal.pone.0281085

36730170