Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Assessment of the potency and effectiveness of a heptavalent oil-adjuvanted (ISA 206) foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in Egypt.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Austria NLM ID: 7506870 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-8798 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03048608 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Arch Virol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: Wien, New York, Springer-Verlag.
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a serious highly contagious viral disease affecting all cloven-hoofed animals, and outbreaks can have a severe economic impact. An inactivated heptavalent oil-adjuvanted FMD vaccine (Aphtovac-7, MEVAC) was prepared from the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strains A-Iran05, A-Africa-IV, O-PanAsia2, O-Manisa, O-EA3, SAT-2 Gharbia, and SAT-2 LIB-12. The vaccine potency and effectiveness were evaluated in three groups of 6- to 8-month-old calves and 200 adult dairy cattle under field conditions. All animals were vaccinated with the vaccine preparation, and the three groups of calves were challenged after 28 days by intradermolingual inoculation with 10 4 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID 50 ) of FMDV serotype A, O, or SAT-2. Mock-vaccinated calves (two per group) served as unvaccinated controls during the challenge test. Adult dairy cattle were tested for seroconversion using a virus neutralization test at 30, 60, and 120 days post-vaccination. All calves displayed complete protection against challenge with the different serotypes of FMDV when compared to the control groups. Serum samples collected after the primary and booster immunizations at 30 days post-vaccination contained high titers of protective antibodies (≥ 1/32; i.e. 1.5 log 10 ). Antibodies persisted until the end of the study period (120 days), with a peak value around 60 days post-vaccination. The heptavalent FMD vaccine preparation was found to be potent and capable of providing a protective immune response under both experimental and field conditions.
      (© 2023. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Singh RK, Sharma GK, Mahajan S et al (2019) Foot and mouth disease virus: immunobiology, advances in vaccines and vaccination strategies addressing vaccine failures-an indian perspective. Vaccines 3:90. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7030090. (PMID: 10.3390/vaccines7030090)
      Jamal SM, Belsham GJ (2013) Foot-and-mouth disease: past, present and future. Vet Res 44:1–14. (PMID: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-116)
      You SH, Jo HE, Choi JH (2019) Evaluation of novel inactivated vaccine for type C foot-and-mouth disease in cattle and pigs. Vet Microbiol 234:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.05.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.05.016)
      Jamal SM, Nazem Shirazi MH, Ozyoruk F et al (2020) Evidence for multiple recombination events within foot-and-mouth disease viruses circulating in West Eurasia. Transbound Emerg Dis 67:979–993. (PMID: 10.1111/tbed.13433)
      Abdulrahman DA, El-Deeb AH, Shafik NG, Shaheen MA, Hussein HA (2019) Mutations in foot and mouth disease virus types A and O isolated from vaccinated animals. Rev Sci Tech 38:663–680. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.3.3016. (PMID: 10.20506/rst.38.3.3016)
      Dar P, Kalaivanan R, Sied N, Mamo B et al (2013) Montanide ISA™ 201 adjuvanted FMD vaccine induces improved immune responses and protection in cattle. Vaccine 31:3327–3332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.078. (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.078)
      Ahmed ES, Hussein HA, Mahmoud NA et al (2016) Isolation and characterization of foot and mouth disease virus serotype SAT2 circulating in Egypt in 2014. Global Vet 17:310–317.
      Soltan MA, Negmaldin AH, El-Diasty MM et al (2017) Molecular characterization of circulating foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) serotype O topotype EA-3 and serotype A (African topotype) genotype IV in Egypt, 2016. Vet Microbiol 208:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.07.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.07.018)
      Abu-Elnaga HI, Rizk SA, Daoud HM, Mohamed AA et al (2020) Comparative nucleotide sequencing of the VP1 capsid gene of recent isolates of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O from Egypt. Arch Virol 165:2021–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04708-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s00705-020-04708-1)
      Petrovsky N, Aguilar JC (2004) Vaccine adjuvants: current state and future trends. Immunol Cell Biol 82:488–496. (PMID: 10.1111/j.0818-9641.2004.01272.x)
      Park ME, Lee SY, Kim RH et al (2014) Enhanced immune responses of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine using new oil/gel adjuvant mixtures in pigs and goats. Vaccine 32:5221–5227. (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.040)
      Ensen-Jarolim E (2015) Aluminium in Allergies and Allergen immunotherapy. World Allergy Organ J 8:1–7.
      Bazid AI, El-Alfy HA, El-Didamony G et al (2021) Adjuvant effect of saponin in an oil-based monovalent (serotype O) foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine on the antibody response in guinea pigs and cattle. Arch Virol 166:1977–1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-021-05043-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00705-021-05043-9)
      Sadir AM, Schudel AA, Laporte O, Braun M, Margni RA (1988) Response to foot-and-mouth disease vaccines in newborn calves. Influence of age, colostral antibodies and adjuvants. Epidemiol Infect 100(1):135–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268800065626. (PMID: 10.1017/s09502688000656262249206)
      SEPPIC (2010) Montanide ISA 61 VG. In S. Inc (ed) abbreviated Montanide ISA 61 VG. http://www.seppic.com/file/galleryelement/pj/7d/7b/48/55/4524-technicalbulletin-mtd-isa-61-vg3096961497520821468.pdf . Accessed: 15, March, 2022.
      Barteling SJ, Cassim NI (2004) Very fast (and safe) inactivation of foot-and-mouth disease virus and enteroviruses by a combination of binary ethyleneimine and formaldehyde. Dev Biol 119:449–455.
      Barteling SJ, Meloen RH (1974) A simple method for the quantification of 140S particles of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 45:362–364. (PMID: 10.1007/BF01242879)
      Doel TR, Chong WK (1982) Comparative immunogenicity of 146S, 75S and 12S particles of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Arch Virol 73:185–191. (PMID: 10.1007/BF01314726)
      WOAH (2022) Foot and Mouth Disease (infection with foot and mouth disease virus). In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2022, Chapter 3.1.8: World Organization for Animal Health (Previously: Office international des epizooties [OIE]), Paris, France.
      Al-Hosary AA, Kandeil A, El-Taweel AN et al (2019) Co-infection with different serotypes of FMDV in vaccinated cattle in Southern Egypt. Virus Genes 55:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-019-01645-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s11262-019-01645-3)
      Aguilar JC, Rodriguez EG (2007) Vaccine adjuvants revisited. Vaccine 25:3752–3762. (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.111)
      Cao Y (2014) Adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccines: recent progress. Expert Rev Vaccines 13:1377–1385. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2014.963562. (PMID: 10.1586/14760584.2014.963562)
      Khorasani A, Madadgar O, Soleimanjahi H, Keyvanfar H, Mahravani H (2016) Evaluation of the efficacy of a new oil-based adjuvant ISA 61 VG FMD vaccine as a potential vaccine for cattle. Iran J Vet Res 17(1):8–12. (PMID: 4898013)
      Barnett PV, Carabin H (2002) A review of emergency foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines. Vaccine 20:1505–1514. (PMID: 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00503-5)
      Choi JH, You SH, Ko MK, Jo HE, Shin SH, Jo H, Lee MJ, Kim SM, Kim B, Lee JS, Park JH (2020) Improved immune responses and safety of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing immunostimulating components in pigs. J Vet Sci 21(5):e74. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e74. (PMID: 10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e747533391)
      Iyer A, Ghosh S, Singh S, Deshmukh R (2000) Evaluation of three ‘ready to formulate’ oil adjuvants for foot-and mouth disease vaccine production. Vaccine 19:1097–1105. (PMID: 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00337-6)
      Waters R, Ludi AB, Fowler VL, Wilsden G et al (2018) Efficacy of a high-potency multivalent foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine in cattle against heterologous challenge with a field virus from the emerging A/ASIA/G-VII lineage. Vaccine 36:1901–1907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.0165864508)
      Vianna Filho YL, Astudillo V, Gomes I, Fernández G, Rozas CEE, Ravison JA, Alonso A (1993) Potency control of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle. Comparison of the 50% protective dose and the protection against generalization. Vaccine 11(14):1424–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410x(93)90171-s. (PMID: 10.1016/0264-410x(93)90171-s)
    • الرقم المعرف:
      0 (Antibodies, Viral)
      0 (Viral Vaccines)
      0 (Adjuvants, Immunologic)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20230112 Date Completed: 20230116 Latest Revision: 20230213
    • الموضوع:
      20231215
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC9836974
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1007/s00705-022-05624-2
    • الرقم المعرف:
      36633687