Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Screening for adverse childhood experiences in pediatrics: A randomized trial of aggregate-level versus item-level response screening formats.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: While there is growing support for screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), rigorous evidence on the efficacy and preference of screening methods is needed.
      Objective: To examine caregiver: (1) rates of disclosure of their child's exposure to ACEs using item-level response (each item can be endorsed) versus aggregate-level response (only total score reported) screening format, (2) associations between family demographic factors and disclosure by screening format, and (3) emotional reaction and experience of screening formats in a diverse, low-income pediatric population.
      Methods: Caregiver participants (n = 367) were randomized to complete the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life Events Screener (PEARLS) tool, in an aggregate-level response vs item-level response format from 2016-2019. Select caregivers (n = 182) participated in debriefing interviews. T-test and chi-square analyses in 2019 compared PEARLS disclosure rates and reactions between the screening modalities. Regression models explored interactions with child characteristics. Thematic analysis of interview notes captured caregiver screening experience.
      Results: PEARLS disclosure rates were significantly higher in the aggregate-level response compared to the item-level response screening arm (p <0.05). This difference was accentuated for children identified as black and/or male (p <0.05). Caregiver reactions to PEARLS screening were rarely negative in either screening format. Qualitative data demonstrated strong caregiver preference for the item-level response format; additional themes include provider relationship, fear with disclosure, and screening outcome expectations.
      Conclusion: While caregivers reported a preference for the item-level response format, the aggregate-level response screening format elicited higher disclosures rates particularly for children who are black or ma.
      Trial Registration: Clinical trial registry: NCT04182906.
      Competing Interests: : I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: The selection of PEARLS as a recommended tool preceded Nadine Burke Harris in her appointment as Surgeon General and was done after careful review and selection by the AB340 workgroup. Dayna Long was a member of the AB340 workgroup, which recommended two tools to the California Department of Health Care Services for screening for childhood adversities, including the PEARLS tool. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
      (Copyright: © 2022 Long et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):804-812. (PMID: 27916618)
      MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 08;68(44):999-1005. (PMID: 31697656)
      Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1508-14. (PMID: 21680929)
      Eur J Public Health. 2005 Apr;15(2):128-32. (PMID: 15755782)
      PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208088. (PMID: 30540843)
      J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1293-303. (PMID: 23200286)
      Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1999 Summer;29(2):119-30. (PMID: 10407965)
      Ment Health Fam Med. 2012 Sep;9(3):181-9. (PMID: 23997824)
      Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Oct;48:104-18. (PMID: 26184055)
      AJS. 2015 Sep;121(2):396-444. (PMID: 26594713)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. (PMID: 3397865)
      Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e13-20. (PMID: 24935995)
      Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2):. (PMID: 31358665)
      Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Dec;98:119-126. (PMID: 30138832)
      J Inj Violence Res. 2009 Jul;1(1):37-47. (PMID: 21483190)
      Eur J Pain. 2015 Nov;19(10):1544-51. (PMID: 25752511)
      Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 1;172(7):809-18. (PMID: 20716700)
      Acad Med. 2017 Mar;92(3):285-288. (PMID: 27655050)
      JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2094-100. (PMID: 11311098)
      Perm J. 2017;21:16-055. (PMID: 28333604)
      Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Dec;62:279-91. (PMID: 26352481)
      Dev Psychol. 2014 Jul;50(7):1891-6. (PMID: 24842459)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Nov;34(11):1830-9. (PMID: 26526240)
      J Health Soc Behav. 2012 Sep;53(3):279-95. (PMID: 22940811)
      Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):e224-31. (PMID: 22201148)
      Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jun;51(467):468-70. (PMID: 11407053)
      Int J Psychiatry Med. 2018 Nov;53(5-6):436-444. (PMID: 30058464)
      Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58. (PMID: 9635069)
      Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014 Jan;15(1):3-21. (PMID: 23887351)
      J Nutr. 2005 Dec;135(12):2831-9. (PMID: 16317128)
    • Molecular Sequence:
      ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04182906
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20221215 Date Completed: 20221219 Latest Revision: 20230109
    • الموضوع:
      20240628
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC9754205
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0273491
    • الرقم المعرف:
      36520927