Discussing spiritual health in primary care and the HOPE tool-A mixed methods survey of GP views.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Attitude of Health Personnel* ; General Practitioners*; Humans ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Referral and Consultation ; Primary Health Care ; Qualitative Research

Background: In the UK, the General Medical Council (GMC) and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) require doctors to consider spiritual health in their consultations. There are documented barriers to discussion of spiritual health, and suggested tools to help overcome them.
Aim: To investigate how comfortable general practitioners (GPs) feel about discussing spiritual health in the consultation, and whether a structured tool (the HOPE tool) would be helpful.
Design and Setting: A mixed-methods online survey completed by GPs in England.
Method: A mixed methods online survey of practicing GPs in England asked about current comfort with the topic of spiritual health and use of spiritual history-taking tools. The acceptability of the HOPE tool was investigated using patient vignettes drawn from clinical practice.
Results: 177 GPs responded. 88 (49.71%) reported that they were comfortable asking patients about spiritual health. GPs felt most comfortable raising the topic after a patient cue (mean difference between pre and post cue 26%). The HOPE tool was viewed as acceptable to use with patients by 65% of participants, although its limitations were acknowledged. Qualitative data showed concerns about regulator (the GMC) and peer disapproval were major barriers to discussions, especially in the case of discordance between patient and doctor background.
Conclusion: Only half of GPs are comfortable discussing spiritual health. Dedicated training, using a structured approach, with regulatory approval, may help overcome barriers to GPs discussing spiritual health. Further research into the benefits, and risks, of discussion of spiritual health in the GP consultation is recommended.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2022 Whitehead et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Educ Prim Care. 2019 Jul;30(4):194-197. (PMID: 31315527)
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1320-8. (PMID: 26032908)
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):261-268. (PMID: 28799437)
J Relig Health. 2005 Spring;44(1):39-53. (PMID: 16285131)
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Oct;62(603):e718-25. (PMID: 23265232)
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):327-37. (PMID: 26269325)
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;67(665):573-574. (PMID: 29192117)
Educ Prim Care. 2018 Nov;29(6):367-375. (PMID: 30339055)
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jan 1;63(1):81-9. (PMID: 11195773)
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Nov;61(592):e749-60. (PMID: 22054339)
J Clin Med. 2016 Sep 01;5(9):. (PMID: 27598212)

HEE REF 0150/8116 United Kingdom DH_ Department of Health

Date Created: 20221108 Date Completed: 20221110 Latest Revision: 20221116

20221213

PMC9642893

10.1371/journal.pone.0276281

36346826