Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Toddlers' social evaluations of agents who act on false beliefs.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Woo BM;Woo BM;Woo BM; Spelke ES; Spelke ES; Spelke ES
  • المصدر:
    Developmental science [Dev Sci] 2023 Mar; Vol. 26 (2), pp. e13314. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 04.
  • نوع النشر :
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9814574 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1467-7687 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1363755X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Dev Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: Oxford, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley-Blackwell, c1998-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Mature social evaluations privilege agents' intentions over the outcomes of their actions, but young children often privilege outcomes over intentions in verbal tasks probing their social evaluations. In three experiments (N = 118), we probed the development of intention-based social evaluation and mental state reasoning using nonverbal methods with 15-month-old toddlers. Toddlers viewed scenarios depicting a protagonist who sought to obtain one of two toys, each inside a different box, as two other agents observed. Then, the boxes' contents were switched in the absence of the protagonist and either in the presence or the absence of the other agents. When the protagonist returned, one agent opened the box containing the protagonist's desired toy (a positive outcome), and the other opened the other box (a neutral outcome). When both agents had observed the toys move to their current locations, the toddlers preferred the agent who opened the box containing the desired toy. In contrast, when the agents had not seen the toys move and therefore should have expected the desired toy's location to be unchanged, the toddlers preferred the agent who opened the box that no longer contained the desired toy. Thus, the toddlers preferred the agent who intended to make the protagonist's desired toy accessible, even when its action, guided by a false belief concerning that toy's location, did not produce a positive outcome. Well before children connect beliefs to social behavior in verbal tasks, toddlers engage in intention-based evaluations of social agents with false beliefs.
      (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
    • References:
      Apperly, I. A., Back, E., Samson, D., & France, L. (2008). The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adults’ performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Cognition, 106(3), 1093-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.005.
      Asaba, M., & Gweon, H. (2022). Young children infer and manage what others think about them. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32), e2105642119.
      Astington, J. W. (2004). Bridging the gap between theory of mind and moral reasoning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(103), 63-72.
      Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? Cognition, 21(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.
      Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition, 112(2), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006.
      Buttelmann, F., Suhrke, J., & Buttelmann, D. (2015). What you get is what you believe: Eighteen-month-olds demonstrate belief understanding in an unexpected-identity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 94-103.
      Casstevens, R. M. (2007). jHab: Java habituation software (version 1.0. 2)[computer software]. Chevy Chase.
      Colomer, M., Bas, J., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2020). Efficiency as a principle for social preferences in infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 194, 104823.
      Cushman, F., Sheketoff, R., Wharton, S., & Carey, S. (2013). The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition, 127(1), 6-21.
      Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082-1089.
      Geraci, A., Simion, F., & Surian, L. (2022). Infants’ intention-based evaluations of distributive actions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 220, 105429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105429.
      Gweon, H. (2021). Inferential social learning: Cognitive foundations of human social learning and teaching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 896-910.
      Hamlin, J. K. (2013a). Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: Evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412470687.
      Hamlin, J. K. (2013b). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition, 128(3), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004.
      Hamlin, J. K., Mahajan, N., Liberman, Z., & Wynn, K. (2013). Not like me = bad: Infants prefer those who harm dissimilar others. Psychological Science, 24(4), 589-594.
      Hamlin, J. K., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J., Goodman, N., & Baker, C. (2013). The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: Experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model. Developmental Science, 16(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12017.
      Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288.
      Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010). Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x.
      Henry, O. (2012). The Gift of the Magi and other short stories. Courier Corporation.
      Heyes, C. (2014). False belief in infancy: A fresh look. Developmental Science, 17(5), 647-659.
      Hogrefe, G.-J., Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1986). Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57, 567-582.
      Holland, C., & Phillips, J. S. (2020). A theoretically driven meta-analysis of implicit theory of mind studies: The role of factivity. 1749-1755.
      Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and others. Harvard University Press.
      Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109(2), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.010.
      Kanakogi, Y., Inoue, Y., Matsuda, G., Butler, D., Hiraki, K., & Myowa-Yamakoshi, M. (2017). Preverbal infants affirm third-party interventions that protect victims from aggressors. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(2), 1-7.
      Karg, K., Schmelz, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Differing views: Can chimpanzees do Level 2 perspective-taking? Animal Cognition, 19(3), 555-564.
      Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, A. (2011). The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition, 119(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006.
      Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12577-12580.
      Knobe, J. (2005). Theory of mind and moral cognition: Exploring the connections. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(8), 357-359.
      Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8110.
      Low, J., & Edwards, K. (2018). The curious case of adults’ interpretations of violation-of-expectation false belief scenarios. Cognitive Development, 46, 86-96.
      Luo, Y. (2011). Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. Developmental Science, 14(2), 453-460.
      Luo, Y., & Beck, W. (2010). Do you see what I see? Infants’ reasoning about others’ incomplete perceptions. Developmental Science, 13(1), 134-142.
      Margoni, F., & Shepperd, M. (2020). Changing the logic of replication: A case from infant studies. Infant Behavior and Development, 61, 101483.
      Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2016). Explaining the U-shaped development of intent-based moral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00219.
      Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2020). Conceptual continuity in the development of intent-based moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 194, 104812.
      Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2018). Infants’ evaluation of prosocial and antisocial agents: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1445-1455.
      Marticorena, D. C. W., Ruiz, A. M., Mukerji, C., Goddu, A., & Santos, L. R. (2011). Monkeys represent others’ knowledge but not their beliefs. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1406-1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01085.x.
      Martin, J. W., Leddy, K., Young , L., & McAuliffe, K. (2022). An earlier role for intent in children's partner choice versus punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(3), 597.
      Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011). How does it look? Level 2 perspective-taking at 36 months of age. Child Development, 82(2), 661-673.
      Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107621.
      Phillips, J., Buckwalter, W., Cushman, F., Friedman, O., Martin, A., Turri, J., Santos, L., & Knobe, J. (2020). Knowledge before Belief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525x20000618.
      Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge & K. Paul.
      Pinto, J. (1996). XHAB64.
      Poulin-Dubois, D., Rakoczy, H., Burnside, K., Crivello, C., Dörrenberg, S., Edwards, K., Krist, H., Kulke, L., Liszkowski, U., Low, J., Perner, J., Powell, L., Priewasser, B., Rafetseder, E., & Ruffman, T. (2018). Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet - A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary. Cognitive Development, 48, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005.
      Powell, L. J. (2022). Adopted utility calculus: Origins of a concept of social affiliation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211048487.
      Powell, L. J., Hobbs, K., Bardis, A., Carey, S., & Saxe, R. (2018). Replications of implicit theory of mind tasks with varying representational demands. Cognitive Development, 46, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.004.
      Powell, L. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2018). Third-party preferences for imitators in preverbal infants. Open Mind, 2(2), 61-71.
      Salvadori, E., Blazsekova, T., Volein, A., Karap, Z., Tatone, D., Mascaro, O., & Csibra, G. (2015). Probing the strength of infants’ preference for helpers over hinderers: Two replication attempts of Hamlin and Wynn (2011). Plos One, 10(11), e0140570.
      Schlingloff, L., Csibra, G., & Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 191795.
      Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2017). Early false-belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(4), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.012.
      Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children's moral and social judgments. Handbook of Moral Development, 2, 23-45.
      Smith-Flores, A. S., Perez, J., Zhang, M. H., & Feigenson, L. (2022). Online measures of looking and learning in infancy. Infancy, 27(1), 4-24.
      Sodian, B., Kristen-Antonow, S., & Kloo, D. (2020). How does children's theory of mind become explicit? A review of longitudinal findings. Child Development Perspectives, 14(3), 171-177.
      Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01944.x.
      Surtees, A. D. R., Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Direct and indirect measures of Level-2 perspective-taking in children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02063.x.
      Thomas, A. J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2019). Infants choose those who defer in conflicts. Current Biology, 29(13), 2183-2189.
      Tomasello, M. (2018). How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), 8491-8498.
      Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121-125.
      Tsoi, L., Hamlin, J. K., Waytz, A., Baron, A. S., & Young, L. (2021). A cooperation advantage for theory of mind in children and adults. Social Cognition, 39(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.19.
      Tsoi, L., Hamlin, J. K., Waytz, A., Baron, A. S., & Young, L. (2020). False belief understanding for negative versus positive interactions in children and adults.
      Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684.
      Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523-541.
      Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.
      Woo, B. M., Liu, S., & Spelke, E. (2021). Open-minded, not naïve: Three-month-old infants encode objects as the goals of other people's reaches. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 514-520.
      Woo, B. M., & Spelke, E. (2022). Infants and toddlers leverage their understanding of action goals to evaluate agents who help others. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mtprn.
      Woo, B. M., & Spelke, E. S. (2020). How to help best: Infants’ changing understanding of multistep actions informs their evaluations of helping. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 384-390.
      Woo, B. M., Steckler, C. M., Le, D. T., & Hamlin, J. K. (2017). Social evaluation of intentional, truly accidental, and negligently accidental helpers and harmers by 10-month-old infants. Cognition, 168, 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.029.
      Woo, B. M., Tan, E., & Hamlin, K. (in press). Human morality is based on an early-emerging moral core. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/98d36.
      Woodward, A. L. (2009). Infants’ grasp of others’ intentions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01605.x.
      Woodward, A. L., & Sommerville, J. A. (2000). Twelve-month-old infants interpret action in context. Psychological Science, 11(1), 73-77.
      Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(20), 8235-8240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701408104.
      Yuill, N., & Perner, J. (1988). Intentionality and knowledge in children's judgments of actor's responsibility and recipient's emotional reaction. Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 358-365.
      Zelazo, P. D., Helwig, C. C., & Lau, A. (1996). Intention, act, and outcome in behavioral prediction and moral judgment. Child Development, 67(5), 2478-2492.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: cognitive development; false-belief understanding; intention; online testing; social evaluation; theory of mind
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20220823 Date Completed: 20230222 Latest Revision: 20230319
    • الموضوع:
      20240513
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1111/desc.13314
    • الرقم المعرف:
      35998080