Designing legislative responses to restrict children's exposure to unhealthy food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing: a case study analysis of Chile, Canada and the United Kingdom.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101245734 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1744-8603 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17448603 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Global Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2005-

Food* ; Marketing*/methods; Adolescent ; Beverages ; Canada ; Chile ; Food Industry ; Humans

Introduction: Introducing legislation that restricts companies from exposing children to marketing of unhealthy food and beverage products is both politically and technically difficult. To advance the literature on the technical design of food marketing legislation, and to support governments around the world with legislative development, we aimed to describe the legislative approach from three governments.
Methods: A multiple case study methodology was adopted to describe how three governments approached designing comprehensive food marketing legislation (Chile, Canada and the United Kingdom). A conceptual framework outlining best practice design principles guided our methodological approach to examine how each country designed the technical aspects of their regulatory response, including the regulatory form adopted, the substantive content of the laws, and the implementation and governance mechanisms used. Data from documentary evidence and 15 semi-structured key informant interviews were collected and synthesised using a directed content analysis.
Results: All three countries varied in their legislative design and were therefore considered of variable strength regarding the legislative elements used to protect children from unhealthy food marketing. When compared against the conceptual framework, some elements of best practice design were present, particularly relating to the governance of legislative design and implementation, but the scope of each law (or proposed laws) had limitations. These included: the exclusion of brand marketing; not protecting children up to age 18; focusing solely on child-directed marketing instead of all marketing that children are likely to be exposed to; and not allocating sufficient resources to effectively monitor and enforce the laws. The United Kingdom's approach to legislation is the most comprehensive and more likely to meet its regulatory objectives.
Conclusions: Our synthesis and analysis of the technical elements of food marketing laws can support governments around the world as they develop their own food marketing restrictions. An analysis of the three approaches illustrates an evolution in the design of food marketing laws over time, as well as the design strengths offered by a legislative approach. Opportunities remain for strengthening legislative responses to protect children from unhealthy food marketing practices.
(© 2022. The Author(s).)

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e28144. (PMID: 34255675)
Global Health. 2017 Jun 15;13(1):34. (PMID: 28619031)
Med J Aust. 2011 Jul 4;195(1):20-4. (PMID: 21728936)
CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;9(1):E280-E287. (PMID: 33757965)
Obes Rev. 2015 Jul;16(7):519-30. (PMID: 25988272)
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Oct;6(5-6):455-61. (PMID: 21846176)
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 30;12(5):. (PMID: 32365952)
Obes Rev. 2019 Mar;20(3):367-374. (PMID: 30549191)
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 2;18(9):e1003695. (PMID: 34473694)
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):e86-95. (PMID: 25713968)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):. (PMID: 31731577)
Global Health. 2018 Jan 23;14(1):8. (PMID: 29361951)
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:116-128. (PMID: 30977265)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 12;18(18):. (PMID: 34574531)
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1962-73. (PMID: 17901436)
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 14;4(6):e001882. (PMID: 31908864)
Obes Rev. 2019 Apr;20(4):554-568. (PMID: 30576057)
Health Promot Int. 2011 Mar;26(1):55-64. (PMID: 20739326)
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. (PMID: 16204405)
Appetite. 2013 Mar;62:209-15. (PMID: 22561190)
Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):227-235. (PMID: 29092014)
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):108-117. (PMID: 30728617)
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. (PMID: 28604169)
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Mar;23(4):747-755. (PMID: 31822317)
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e433-41. (PMID: 21062202)
Global Health. 2014 Jun 05;10:44. (PMID: 24903332)
Nutr Rev. 2019 Nov 1;77(11):787-816. (PMID: 31329232)
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 18;11(4):. (PMID: 31003489)
Obes Rev. 2013 Dec;14(12):960-74. (PMID: 23845093)
Health Syst Reform. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):1-8. (PMID: 32530726)
Prev Med. 2015 Jun;75:32-43. (PMID: 25735606)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 13;17(2):. (PMID: 31941054)
Obes Rev. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13447. (PMID: 35384238)
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Jan;44(1):74-82. (PMID: 30273499)
Global Health. 2022 Mar 9;18(1):29. (PMID: 35264200)
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31578. (PMID: 22355376)
Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):37-45. (PMID: 26627088)
Glob Public Health. 2021 Oct 14;:1-11. (PMID: 34648410)
Obes Rev. 2016 Oct;17(10):945-59. (PMID: 27427474)
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun;21(9):1608-1617. (PMID: 29433594)
Lancet. 2011 Sep 3;378(9794):859-60. (PMID: 21890035)

Keywords: Canada; Child health; Chile; Food marketing; Law; UK; Unhealthy food

Date Created: 20220723 Date Completed: 20220726 Latest Revision: 20220921

20231215

PMC9308290

10.1186/s12992-022-00865-x

35870937