Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Quantifying cilia beat frequency using high-speed video microscopy: Assessing frame rate requirements when imaging different ciliated tissues.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101607800 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2051-817X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 2051817X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Physiol Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: [Malden MA] : published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society, 2013-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Motile cilia are found in numerous locations throughout our body and play a critical role in various physiological processes. The most commonly used method to assess cilia motility is to quantify cilia beat frequency (CBF) via video microscopy. However, a large heterogeneity exists within published literature regarding the framerate used to image cilia motility for calculating CBF. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal frame rate required to image cilia motility for CBF assessment, and if the Nyquist theorem may be used to set this rate. One-second movies of cilia were collected at >600 fps from mouse airways and ependyma at room-temperature or 37°C. Movies were then down-sampled to 30-300 fps. CBF was quantified for identical cilia at different framerates by either manual counting or automated MATLAB script. Airway CBF was significantly impaired in 30 fps movies, while ependymal CBF was significantly impaired in both 60 and 30 fps movies. Pairwise comparison showed that video framerate should be at least 150 fps to accurately measure CBF, with minimal improvement in CBF accuracy in movies >150 fps. The automated script was also found to be less accurate for measuring CBF in lower fps movies than manual counting, however, this difference disappeared in higher framerate movies (>150 fps). In conclusion, our data suggest the Nyquist theorem is unreliable for setting sampling rate for CBF measurement. Instead, sampling rate should be 3-4 times faster than CBF for accurate CBF assessment. Especially if CBF calculation is to be automated.
      (© 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.)
    • References:
      Dis Model Mech. 2020 Oct 30;13(10):. (PMID: 32988999)
      Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb 7;104(2):229-245. (PMID: 30665704)
      Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun 15;197(12):e24-e39. (PMID: 29905515)
      Am J Rhinol. 2006 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-7. (PMID: 16539308)
      Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Jul 28;9:622515. (PMID: 34395412)
      Biomolecules. 2020 Aug 14;10(8):. (PMID: 32823934)
      J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 06;8(3):. (PMID: 30845692)
      Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 05;21(11):. (PMID: 32517062)
      Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 11;9(1):2279. (PMID: 29891944)
      Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:377-400. (PMID: 17009929)
      Birth Defects Res. 2020 Oct;112(16):1253-1259. (PMID: 32648687)
      Front Neurosci. 2014 Aug 22;8:265. (PMID: 25202234)
      Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Sep 17;6(1):77. (PMID: 32943623)
      Front Pediatr. 2015 Feb 11;3:7. (PMID: 25717467)
      Life Sci Alliance. 2021 Mar 2;4(5):. (PMID: 33653689)
      Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996 Sep;105(9):734-45. (PMID: 8800062)
      Front Pediatr. 2014 Oct 16;2:111. (PMID: 25360434)
      Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;11(7):. (PMID: 34359383)
      Sensors (Basel). 2013 Apr 08;13(4):4640-58. (PMID: 23567529)
      Chest. 2019 May;155(5):1008-1017. (PMID: 30826306)
      Cilia. 2012 Aug 01;1:14. (PMID: 23351276)
      Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82. (PMID: 22743772)
      Cilia. 2012 Jun 07;1(1):8. (PMID: 23351965)
      J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Jun;60(6):2109-13. (PMID: 3487539)
      Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 16;10(1):1763. (PMID: 30992452)
      Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 4;12(1):5796. (PMID: 34608154)
      Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):252-6. (PMID: 27048675)
      Biol Cell. 1992;76(3):335-8. (PMID: 1305479)
      Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 17;11(9):. (PMID: 34574040)
      Development. 2018 Jan 9;145(1):. (PMID: 29317443)
      Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;85:63-82. (PMID: 19147002)
      Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Feb;110:19-33. (PMID: 33279404)
      Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Apr;15(4):199-219. (PMID: 30733609)
      J Microsc. 2003 Aug;211(Pt 2):103-11. (PMID: 12887704)
      J Cyst Fibros. 2021 Mar;20(2):364-371. (PMID: 33414087)
      Fluids Barriers CNS. 2021 Jul 07;18(1):31. (PMID: 34233705)
      J Vis Exp. 2013 Aug 08;(78):. (PMID: 23963287)
      Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009 Jun;296(6):L1067-75. (PMID: 19346437)
      Physiol Rep. 2022 Jun;10(11):e15349. (PMID: 35678028)
      Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;49(2):94-104. (PMID: 30819400)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: cilia; cilia beat frequency; ependyma; respiratory epithelium
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20220609 Date Completed: 20220610 Latest Revision: 20220716
    • الموضوع:
      20231215
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC9178357
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.14814/phy2.15349
    • الرقم المعرف:
      35678028