Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison between Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and self-reported measures for diagnosing pain in conscious individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ على الانترنت اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • المؤلفون: Baroni DA;Baroni DA; Abreu LG; Abreu LG; Paiva SM; Paiva SM; Costa LR; Costa LR
  • المصدر:
    Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2022 Feb 21; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 2862. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 21.
  • نوع النشر :
    Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Systematic Review
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
    • الموضوع:
      Self Report*; Consciousness/*physiology ; Heart Rate/*physiology ; Pain Measurement/*methods ; Pain, Postoperative/*diagnosis ; Wakefulness/*physiology; Anesthesia Recovery Period ; Humans ; Postoperative Period
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), an objective measure of pain based on heart rate variability (HRV), has its usefulness in awake patients still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess ANI's accuracy compared to self-reported pain measures in conscious individuals undergoing medical procedures or painful stimuli. PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and grey literature were searched until March 2021. Of the 832 identified citations, 16 studies complied with the eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis including nine studies demonstrated a weak negative correlation between ANI and NRS for pain assessment in individuals in the post-anesthetic recovery room (r = - 0.0984, 95% CI = - 0.397 to 0.220, I 2  = 95.82%), or in those submitted to electrical stimulus (r = - 0.089; 95% CI = - 0.390 to 0.228, I 2  = 0%). The evidence to use ANI in conscious individuals is weak compared to self-report measures of pain, yet ANI explains a part of self-report. Therefore, some individuals may be benefited from the use of ANI during procedures or in the immediate postoperative period.
      (© 2022. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. (PMID: 31047645)
      Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Jul - Aug;67(4):370-375. (PMID: 28410821)
      J Pain Res. 2017 Nov 16;10:2687-2698. (PMID: 29180895)
      J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Nov 16;:. (PMID: 34783941)
      Br J Anaesth. 1994 Feb;72(2):177-80. (PMID: 8110570)
      Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):15-17. (PMID: 28628575)
      Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):627-9. (PMID: 23611914)
      Pain. 1979 Jun;6(3):249. (PMID: 460932)
      Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Feb;48(1):50-57. (PMID: 32076680)
      PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138237. (PMID: 26379270)
      Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;27(2):235-47. (PMID: 24012235)
      Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Feb;33(2):118-25. (PMID: 26266775)
      PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. (PMID: 19621072)
      Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 14;50(1):. (PMID: 31731328)
      J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):1087-1093. (PMID: 31628569)
      Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):272-283. (PMID: 28489614)
      Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):74-9. (PMID: 24164336)
      J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):511-3. (PMID: 25995184)
      Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):146-51. (PMID: 22360936)
      Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):635-636. (PMID: 28403418)
      Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:4303-6. (PMID: 17946620)
      IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2008 Dec;30(12):2067-83. (PMID: 18988943)
      Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e322-e327. (PMID: 30915996)
      Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):715-21. (PMID: 24322571)
      Can J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;64(8):828-835. (PMID: 28432612)
      Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(5):e160721189770. (PMID: 33390146)
      Exp Physiol. 2012 Oct;97(10):1140. (PMID: 23015733)
      Control Clin Trials. 1997 Dec;18(6):568-79; discussion 661-6. (PMID: 9408719)
      Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1445-1454. (PMID: 27170468)
      Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Aug - Sep;64(7):406-414. (PMID: 28341079)
      J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Aug;26(4):289-94. (PMID: 22454275)
      Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul - Aug;69(4):396-402. (PMID: 31399197)
      Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):890-5. (PMID: 26582849)
      Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 08;20(2):. (PMID: 31936420)
      Pain Rep. 2018 Mar 05;3(2):e643. (PMID: 29756089)
      Perfusion. 2020 Mar;35(2):154-162. (PMID: 31387454)
      J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Jun;32(3):481-486. (PMID: 28631050)
      Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1084-8. (PMID: 24525906)
      J Hypertens Suppl. 1996 Sep;14(2):S9-12; discussion S13. (PMID: 8934372)
      Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):453-9. (PMID: 23592690)
      Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 1;204:116254. (PMID: 31604122)
      Anesthesiology. 2003 Jan;98(1):34-40. (PMID: 12502976)
      Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Dec;84(12):1361-1368. (PMID: 29991223)
      Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Nov;51(10):1297-304. (PMID: 17944631)
      Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2016 Aug;23(3):189-200. (PMID: 27989326)
      Healthc Technol Lett. 2018 Jul 17;5(4):124-129. (PMID: 30155264)
      Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. (PMID: 17034633)
      Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1024-30. (PMID: 23471754)
      Auton Neurosci. 2009 May 11;147(1-2):91-6. (PMID: 19201661)
      Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1840-3. (PMID: 19963520)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20220222 Date Completed: 20220315 Latest Revision: 20220315
    • الموضوع:
      20250114
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC8860998
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1038/s41598-022-06993-z
    • الرقم المعرف:
      35190644