Healthcare providers' perceived support from their organization is associated with lower burnout and anxiety amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Organizational Culture*; Anxiety/*epidemiology ; Burnout, Professional/*epidemiology ; COVID-19/*psychology ; Health Personnel/*psychology ; Social Support/*psychology; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organizational Policy ; Social Support/statistics & numerical data

Background: Professional burnout represents a significant threat to the American healthcare system. Organizational and individual factors may increase healthcare providers' susceptibility or resistance to burnout. We hypothesized that during the COVID-19 pandemic, 1) higher levels of perceived organizational support (POS) are associated with lower risk for burnout and anxiety, and 2) anxiety mediates the association between POS and burnout.
Methods: In this longitudinal prospective study, we surveyed healthcare providers employed full-time at a large, multihospital healthcare system monthly over 6 months (April to November 2020). Participants were randomized using a 1:1 allocation stratified by provider type, gender, and academic hospital status to receive one of two versions of the survey instrument formulated with different ordering of the measures to minimize response bias due to context effects. The exposure of interest was POS measured using the validated 8-item Survey of POS (SPOS) scale. Primary outcomes of interest were anxiety and risk for burnout as measured by the validated 10-item Burnout scale from the Professional Quality (Pro-QOL) instrument and 4-item Emotional Distress-Anxiety short form of the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scale, respectively. Linear mixed models evaluated the associations between POS and both burnout and anxiety. A mediation analysis evaluated whether anxiety mediated the POS-burnout association.
Results: Of the 538 participants recruited, 402 (75%) were included in the primary analysis. 55% of participants were physicians, 73% 25-44 years of age, 73% female, 83% White, and 44% had ≥1 dependent. Higher POS was significantly associated with a lower risk for burnout (-0.23; 95% CI -0.26, -0.21; p<0.001) and lower degree of anxiety (-0.07; 95% CI -0.09, -0.06; p = 0.010). Anxiety mediated the associated between POS and burnout (direct effect -0.17; 95% CI -0.21, -0.13; p<0.001; total effect -0.23; 95% CI -0.28, -0.19; p<0.001).
Conclusion: During a health crisis, increasing the organizational support perceived by healthcare employees may reduce the risk for burnout through a reduction in anxiety. Improving the relationship between healthcare organizations and the individuals they employ may reduce detrimental effects of psychological distress among healthcare providers and ultimately improve patient care.
Competing Interests: No author have competing interests.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):432-40. (PMID: 25796117)
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):686-92. (PMID: 17234905)
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jan-Mar;33(1):29-39. (PMID: 18091442)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5629. (PMID: 27977605)
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0136955. (PMID: 26322644)
Psychol Rep. 1998 Apr;82(2):627-42. (PMID: 9621740)
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 15;184(10):1140-6. (PMID: 21852543)
Am J Health Behav. 2018 Mar 1;42(2):116-128. (PMID: 29458520)
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Aug;32(4):566-576. (PMID: 31265178)
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):65-71. (PMID: 28971306)
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):183-219. (PMID: 28649483)
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 Nov;20(4):358-362. (PMID: 31695741)
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jun;31(3):351-356. (PMID: 29474215)
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238906. (PMID: 32915878)
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;52(4):233-40. (PMID: 17500304)
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Feb 06;4:6. (PMID: 19200364)
Hosp Pract (1995). 2019 Dec;47(5):217-220. (PMID: 31674833)
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 4;170(11):784-790. (PMID: 31132791)
Int J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;28(6):788-800. (PMID: 33660187)
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):1346-1359. (PMID: 29148110)
JAAPA. 2019 Nov;32(11):42-47. (PMID: 31663895)
Psychol Serv. 2014 Feb;11(1):41-9. (PMID: 24564442)
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Dec;23(6):741-748. (PMID: 33263142)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 22;13(6):. (PMID: 27338436)
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 13;10:284. (PMID: 30918490)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):. (PMID: 32466251)
Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000. (PMID: 19934755)
J Occup Health. 2012;54(1):1-8. (PMID: 22156318)
Minerva Anestesiol. 2007 Apr;73(4):195-200. (PMID: 17468736)
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):698-714. (PMID: 12184574)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 28;14:325. (PMID: 25066375)
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):1230. (PMID: 32787815)
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1573. (PMID: 25657627)
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976. (PMID: 32202646)
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1377-85. (PMID: 22911330)

L30 AG064730 United States AG NIA NIH HHS; T32 HL098036 United States HL NHLBI NIH HHS

Date Created: 20211119 Date Completed: 20211206 Latest Revision: 20211214

20221213

PMC8604356

10.1371/journal.pone.0259858

34797847