Assessment of the release of metals from cigarette butts into the environment.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Environmental Pollutants/*toxicity ; Metals/*toxicity ; Tobacco Products/*toxicity; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Environmental Pollutants/analysis ; Heavy Metal Poisoning ; Humans ; Metals/analysis ; Solubility ; Spectrum Analysis ; Water

Cigarette butts are known to contain toxic metals which pose a potential threat to the environment and human health. The seriousness of this threat is largely determined by the leachability of these toxic metals when the butts are exposed to aqueous solutions in the environment. The aims of this study were to determine the presence and mobility of toxic and non-toxic elements found in discarded cigarette butts; to relate this mobility to two different contact situations with leaching liquids: tumbling and trampling (batch test) and percolation in a static position (column test); and finally, to verify possible variations in solubility by simulating different environmental systems. Five leachants with different pH values were used to simulate various environmental conditions The concentrations of the solubilized metals were determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). CH3COOH pH 2.5 showed the greatest capacity to dissolve many elements. On the contrary, weakly acidic or alkaline environments did not favor the leachability of the elements. The best extraction capacity of the column with respect to the batch is statistically significant (p <0.05) for the elements Al, Fe, Ni and Zn, while the batch for P, Si, S. Pb, Cd, As were not detectable in cigarette butts, while Hg had an average concentration of 0.0502 μg/g. However, Hg was < LOD in all different leachants.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Environ Res. 2021 Nov;202:111706. (PMID: 34284015)
Tob Control. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1:i30-5. (PMID: 21504922)
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):461-463. (PMID: 27384342)
Environ Monit Assess. 2008 Feb;137(1-3):481-93. (PMID: 17508260)
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jan 15;39(2):479-88. (PMID: 15707047)
Waste Manag. 2011 Feb;31(2):236-45. (PMID: 21071197)
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Nov;185(11):9471-9. (PMID: 23712460)
Environ Sci Technol. 1994 May 1;28(5):924-7. (PMID: 22191835)
Health Phys. 2017 Jan;112(1):28-32. (PMID: 27906785)
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Mar 5;385:121591. (PMID: 31727528)
Environ Pollut. 2020 Apr;259:113916. (PMID: 32023793)
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Oct 30;182:109418. (PMID: 31327493)
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2018;81(21):1123-1134. (PMID: 30388930)
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:556-561. (PMID: 29454197)
Environ Sci Technol. 1995 Sep 1;29(9):2311-6. (PMID: 22280272)
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Feb;25(6):5465-5473. (PMID: 29214478)
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Aug 15;416:125816. (PMID: 34492782)
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110881. (PMID: 33607099)
Waste Manag. 2008;28(1):133-41. (PMID: 17331711)
Waste Manag Res. 2005 Oct;23(5):457-67. (PMID: 16273954)
Waste Manag. 2004;24(2):165-72. (PMID: 14761755)
Waste Manag. 2007;27(7):932-45. (PMID: 17258447)
Mar Pollut Bull. 2015 Jun 15;95(1):362-4. (PMID: 25913792)

0 (Environmental Pollutants)
0 (Metals)
059QF0KO0R (Water)

Date Created: 20211118 Date Completed: 20220121 Latest Revision: 20240818

20240818

PMC8601425

10.1371/journal.pone.0260111

34793538