Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children's mastery of symbols influences children's developing mastery of numeracy.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      Cognition. 1990 Aug;36(2):155-93. (PMID: 2225756)
      Psychol Sci. 2004 Nov;15(11):776-81. (PMID: 15482450)
      PLoS One. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):e0166685. (PMID: 27875540)
      J Child Lang. 1997 Oct;24(3):511-33. (PMID: 9519584)
      J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:116-133. (PMID: 28888192)
      Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):499-503. (PMID: 15486303)
      Child Dev. 2021 Mar;92(2):e186-e200. (PMID: 32816346)
      J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jan;153:163-167. (PMID: 27816120)
      Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):162-73. (PMID: 22245033)
      Behav Brain Funct. 2006 May 30;2:20. (PMID: 16734906)
      Dev Sci. 2017 Nov;20(6):. (PMID: 27747998)
      Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e174. (PMID: 29342642)
      Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):394-406. (PMID: 20347435)
      Cognition. 2005 Apr;95(3):B59-68. (PMID: 15788158)
      Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1569-79. (PMID: 12446899)
      Dev Sci. 2005 Jan;8(1):88-101. (PMID: 15647069)
      J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):553-590. (PMID: 28376934)
      Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):496-9. (PMID: 15319490)
      J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2336-51. (PMID: 20961170)
      Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14. (PMID: 15242690)
      Psychol Sci. 2005 May;16(5):372-7. (PMID: 15869696)
      Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):199-217. (PMID: 22284806)
      Neuron. 2004 Oct 28;44(3):547-55. (PMID: 15504333)
      Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):2013-9. (PMID: 23921769)
      J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):255-65. (PMID: 23163765)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5805-5810. (PMID: 30837317)
      Cognition. 2014 Apr;131(1):92-107. (PMID: 24462713)
      J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;46(1):3-18. (PMID: 15660640)
      Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1428-1446. (PMID: 18020822)
      Front Psychol. 2018 May 15;9:606. (PMID: 29867624)
      Dev Psychol. 2018 Mar;54(3):440-457. (PMID: 29154653)
      Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan;9(1):6-10. (PMID: 15639434)
      Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1146-58. (PMID: 27062391)
      Cognition. 2005 Oct;97(3):295-313. (PMID: 16260263)
      Cognition. 2021 Feb;207:104521. (PMID: 33280814)
      Science. 2017 Jul 7;357(6346):47-55. (PMID: 28684518)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3253-8. (PMID: 22331874)
      Nature. 2008 Oct 2;455(7213):665-8. (PMID: 18776888)
      Cognition. 2000 Jan 10;74(1):B1-B11. (PMID: 10594312)
      J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:278-293. (PMID: 27596808)
      Cognition. 2001 Jan;78(1):45-88. (PMID: 11062322)
      J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jul;147:82-99. (PMID: 27061668)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):13179-84. (PMID: 18757729)
      Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1531-1543. (PMID: 30251006)
      PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):e0164436. (PMID: 27764117)
      Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Nov 29;5:150. (PMID: 22144955)
      Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jul;72:27-53. (PMID: 24680885)
      Cognition. 1992 Aug;44(1-2):43-74. (PMID: 1511586)
      Science. 2016 Mar 11;351(6278):1161. (PMID: 26965619)
      Trends Neurosci Educ. 2021 Mar;22:100149. (PMID: 33845980)
      Child Dev. 1986 Jun;57(3):646-59. (PMID: 3720396)
      Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Dec;31(6):623-42; discussion 642-87. (PMID: 19077327)
      Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Dec;14(12):542-51. (PMID: 21055996)
      Science. 1987 Dec 11;238(4833):1556-7. (PMID: 2446392)
      Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):600-6. (PMID: 20424108)
      Dev Sci. 2007 May;10(3):365-73. (PMID: 17444976)
      Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jun;12(6):213-8. (PMID: 18468942)
      Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):819-24. (PMID: 18547557)
      Dev Sci. 2013 May;16(3):365-76. (PMID: 23587036)
      Behav Brain Funct. 2006 May 30;2:19. (PMID: 16734905)
      Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):188-200. (PMID: 25044247)
      Science. 2015 Oct 9;350(6257):196-8. (PMID: 26450209)
      J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):134-49. (PMID: 21767040)
      Nature. 1992 Aug 27;358(6389):749-50. (PMID: 1508269)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20211115 Date Completed: 20211231 Latest Revision: 20211231
    • الموضوع:
      20221213
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC8592431
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0259775
    • الرقم المعرف:
      34780526