Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Bölek KA;Bölek KA; De Jong G; De Jong G; Henssen D; Henssen D; Henssen D
  • المصدر:
    Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2021 Jul 27; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 15292. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 27.
  • نوع النشر :
    Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Systematic Review
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      The use of Augmented Reality (AR) in anatomical education has been promoted by numerous authors. Next to financial and ethical advantages, AR has been described to decrease cognitive load while increasing student motivation and engagement. Despite these advantages, the effects of AR on learning outcome varies in different studies and an overview and aggregated outcome on learning anatomy is lacking. Therefore, a meta-analysis on the effect of AR vs. traditional anatomical teaching methods on learning outcome was performed. Systematic database searches were conducted by two independent investigators using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. This yielded five papers for meta-analysis totaling 508 participants; 240 participants in the AR-groups and 268 participants in the control groups. (306 females/202 males). Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in anatomic test scores between the AR group and the control group (- 0.765 percentage-points (%-points); P = 0.732). Sub analysis on the use of AR vs. the use of traditional 2D teaching methods showed a significant disadvantage when using AR (- 5.685%-points; P = 0.024). Meta-regression analysis showed no significant co-relation between mean difference in test results and spatial abilities (as assessed by the mental rotations test scores). Student motivation and/or engagement could not be included since studies used different assessment tools. This meta-analysis showed that insufficient evidence is present to conclude AR significantly impacts learning outcome and that outcomes are significantly impacted by students' spatial abilities. However, only few papers were suitable for meta-analysis, indicating that there is a need for more well-designed, randomized-controlled trials on AR in anatomy education research.
      (© 2021. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Sep;3(4):300-311. (PMID: 24464832)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1294-302. (PMID: 21803546)
      Ann Anat. 2020 May;229:151463. (PMID: 31978568)
      Ann Anat. 2018 Jan;215:71-77. (PMID: 29017852)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1283-93. (PMID: 21839614)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2021 May;14(3):368-376. (PMID: 33378557)
      BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. (PMID: 22008217)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;13(5):558-567. (PMID: 31887792)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277-82. (PMID: 21802904)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Oct;9(5):431-9. (PMID: 26990135)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Nov;13(6):707-720. (PMID: 32048478)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. (PMID: 21208779)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Nov;12(6):585-598. (PMID: 30697948)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):525-38. (PMID: 25557582)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400. (PMID: 21194891)
      Science. 1944 Apr 7;99(2571):267-71. (PMID: 17736683)
      Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S97-9. (PMID: 12377717)
      Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-526. (PMID: 17074699)
      BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 01;16(1):230. (PMID: 27581521)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2020 May;13(3):353-365. (PMID: 31269322)
      Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Oct;47(2):599-604. (PMID: 724398)
      Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1235:89-101. (PMID: 32488637)
      Can Med Educ J. 2020 Mar 16;11(1):e81-e96. (PMID: 32215146)
      Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1293-1300. (PMID: 29561275)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2022 Aug;15(5):839-849. (PMID: 34218515)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Oct;9(5):411-21. (PMID: 26950521)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Nov;12(6):599-609. (PMID: 30648818)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1311-6. (PMID: 21802902)
      Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1. (PMID: 25554246)
      Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Mar;89(2):104-7. (PMID: 17346399)
      BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):127. (PMID: 32334594)
      Science. 1971 Feb 19;171(3972):701-3. (PMID: 5540314)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;10(4):363-371. (PMID: 27925681)
      Med Educ. 2007 May;41(5):495-501. (PMID: 17470079)
      Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10 Suppl):S87-9. (PMID: 10536603)
      Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:151-157. (PMID: 26996541)
      Lancet. 2001 Feb 3;357(9253):363-4. (PMID: 11211004)
      Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):549-559. (PMID: 28419750)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1303-10. (PMID: 21802903)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. (PMID: 21195583)
      Clin Anat. 2016 May;29(4):446-53. (PMID: 26646315)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):407-15. (PMID: 21247734)
      BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. (PMID: 12958120)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20210728 Date Completed: 20211108 Latest Revision: 20240402
    • الموضوع:
      20240402
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC8316386
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1038/s41598-021-94721-4
    • الرقم المعرف:
      34315955