Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Willing and able? Theory of mind, social motivation, and social competence in middle childhood and early adolescence.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Devine RT;Devine RT; Apperly IA; Apperly IA
- المصدر:
Developmental science [Dev Sci] 2022 Jan; Vol. 25 (1), pp. e13137. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 07.- نوع النشر :
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't- اللغة:
English - المصدر:
- معلومة اضافية
- المصدر: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9814574 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1467-7687 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1363755X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Dev Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
- بيانات النشر: Original Publication: Oxford, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley-Blackwell, c1998-
- الموضوع:
- نبذة مختصرة : This study investigated the links between theory of mind, social motivation, and children's social competence in middle childhood and early adolescence. Two hundred and sixty four children (136 girls, 128 boys) aged between 8 and 13 years (M Age = 10.88 years, SD = 1.45) completed theory-of-mind tests and self-report questionnaires measuring social motivation. Teachers rated children's social competence at school. Teacher-rated social competence was associated with individual differences in both theory of mind and children's motivation to develop and maintain social relationships. Results suggest that while individual differences in social motivation and theory of mind are partially overlapping, both theory of mind ability and social motivation contribute to successful social interaction at school.
(© 2021 The Authors. Developmental Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) - References: Apperly, I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825-839. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.676055.
Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014098.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthèn, B. O. (2010). Plausible values for latent variables using Mplus. http://www.statmodel.com/download/Plausible.pdf.
Astington, J. W. (2003). Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of MInd (pp. 13-38). Psychology Press.
Banerjee, R., Watling, D., & Caputi, M. (2011). Peer relations and the understanding of faux pas: Longitudinal evidence for bidirectional associations: peer relations faux pas. Child Development, 82(6), 1887-1905. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01669.x.
Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C.-S., & Haynes, O. M. (2010). Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22(4), 717-735. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000416.
Bosacki, S., Moreira, F. P., Sitnik, V., Andrews, K., & Talwar, V. (2020). Theory of mind, self-knowledge, and perceptions of loneliness in emerging adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 181(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2019.1687418.
Brunsdon, V. E., & Happé, F. (2014). Exploring the ‘fractionation’ of autism at the cognitive level. Autism, 18(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313499456.
Burnside, K., Wright, K., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2018). Social orienting predicts implicit false belief understanding in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 175, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.015.
Burt, K. B., Obradović, J., Long, J. D., & Masten, A. S. (2008). The interplay of social competence and psychopathology over 20 years: Testing transactional and cascade models. Child Development, 79(2), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01130.x.
Caputi, M., Cugnata, F., & Brombin, C. (2021). Theory of mind and loneliness: Effects of a conversation-based training at school. International Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12707.
Chevallier, C., Grèzes, J., Molesworth, C., Berthoz, S., & Happé, F. (2012). Brief report: Selective social anhedonia in high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(7), 1504-1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1364-0.
Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007.
Chevallier, C., Tonge, N., Safra, L., Kahn, D., Kohls, G., Miller, J., & Schultz, R. T. (2016). Measuring social motivation using signal detection and reward responsiveness. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0167024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167024.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Pisauro, M. A., & Apps, M. A. J. (2020). Effort shapes social cognition and behaviour: A neuro-cognitive framework. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 426-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.08.003.
Coplan, R. J., Ooi, L. L., & Nocita, G. (2015). When one is company and two is a crowd: Why some children prefer solitude. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12131.
Coplan, R. J., Rose-Krasnor, L., Weeks, M., Kingsbury, A., Kingsbury, M., & Bullock, A. (2013). Alone is a crowd: Social motivations, social withdrawal, and socioemotional functioning in later childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028861.
Dawson, G., Toth, K., Abbott, R., Osterling, J., Munson, J., Estes, A., & Liaw, J. (2004). Early social attention impairments in autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.271.
Devine, R. T. (2019). Willing and Able: Relations between social motivation, theory of mind, and social competence in middle childhood and early adolescence. osf.io/7a5ep.
Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2013). Silent films and strange stories: Theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84(3), 989-1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12017.
Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2016). Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: Reliability and validity of the Silent Films and Strange Stories tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.011.
Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2018). Family correlates of false belief understanding in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 89(3), 971-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12682.
Devine, R. T., White, N., Ensor, R., & Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind in middle childhood: Longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 758-771. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000105.
Dubey, I., Ropar, D., & Hamilton, A. (2018). Comparison of choose-a-movie and approach-avoidance paradigms to measure social motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 42(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9647-1.
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.x.
Fink, E., Begeer, S., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & de Rosnay, M. (2015). Friendlessness and theory of mind: A prospective longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12060.
Fink, E., Rosnay, M., Peterson, C., & Slaughter, V. (2013). Validation of the peer social maturity scale for assessing children's social skills. Infant and Child Development, 22(5), 539-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1809.
Foulkes, L., Bird, G., Gökçen, E., McCrory, E., & Viding, E. (2015). Common and distinct impacts of autistic traits and Alexithymia on social reward. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0121018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121018.
Frühe, B., Allgaier, A.-K., Pietsch, K., Baethmann, M., Peters, J., Kellnar, S., Heep, A., Burdach, S., von Schweinitz, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2012). Children's Depression Screener (ChilD-S): Development and validation of a depression screening instrument for children in pediatric care. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43(1), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0254-1.
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202.
Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. Guilford Press.
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.
Goodhew, S. C., & Edwards, M. (2019). Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations. Consciousness and Cognition, 69, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.008.
Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093.
Heck, R., & Thomas, S. L. (2020). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hughes, C., & Devine, R. T. (2015a). A social perspective on theory of mind. In Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socio-emotional processes (pp. 564-609). Wiley.
Hughes, C., & Devine, R. T. (2015b). Individual differences in theory of mind from preschool to adolescence: achievements and directions. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12124.
Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192-1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000140.
Kazdin, A. E. (1989). Evaluation of the pleasure scale in the assessment of anhedonia in children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(3), 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198905000-00010.
Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2020). Some but not all aspects of (advanced) theory of mind predict loneliness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 144-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12302.
Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., Eggum, N. D., Kochel, K. P., & McConnell, E. M. (2011). Characterizing and comparing the friendships of anxious-solitary and unsociable preadolescents: Anxious-solitary and unsociable preadolescents’ friendships. Child Development, 82(5), 1434-1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01632.x.
Lagattuta, K. H., Elrod, N. M., & Kramer, H. J. (2016). How do thoughts, emotions, and decisions align? A new way to examine theory of mind during middle childhood and beyond. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.013.
Lagattuta, K. H., Kramer, H. J., Kennedy, K., Hjortsvang, K., Goldfarb, D., & Tashjian, S. (2015). Beyond Sally's missing marble: Further development in children's understanding of mind and emotion in middle childhood. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 48, 185-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.005.
Lalonde, C. E., & Chandler, M. J. (1995). False belief understanding goes to school: On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind. Cognition & Emotion, 9(2-3), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508409007.
Lam, C. B., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2014). Time with peers from middle childhood to late adolescence: Developmental course and adjustment correlates. Child Development, 85(4), 1677-1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12235.
Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2017). Relations between theory of mind and executive function in middle childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 163, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.011.
Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., Hughes, C., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: A training program. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.002.
Lecce, S., & Devine, R. T. (2021). Social interaction in early and middle childhood: The role of theory of mind. In H. Ferguson & E. Bradford (Eds.), The cognitive basis of social interaction across the lifespan (pp. 46-68). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843290.003.0003.
Lockwood, P. L., Ang, Y.-S., Husain, M., & Crockett, M. J. (2017). Individual differences in empathy are associated with apathy-motivation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17415-w.
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2016). Relations between theory of mind, mental state language and social adjustment in primary school children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1093930.
McNeish, D. (2017). Small sample methods for multilevel modeling: A colloquial elucidation of REML and the Kenward-Roger correction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(5), 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1344538.
McNeish, D. M., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9287-x.
Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27(3), 272-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070866.
Moore, C., Bosacki, S. L., & Macgillivray, S. (2011). Theory of mind and social interest in zero-acquaintance play situations: Theory of mind and social interest. Child Development, 82(4), 1163-1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01602.x.
Muthèn, L. K., & Muthèn, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User's guide. (8th ed.). Muthèn & Muthèn.
Obradović, J., Sulik, M. J., Finch, J. E., & Tirado-Strayer, N. (2018). Assessing students’ executive functions in the classroom: Validating a scalable group-based procedure. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.03.003.
OECD. (2018). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.
Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children's social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.699.
Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2016). Scaling of advanced theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 87(6), 1971-1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12566.
Perez-Zapata, D., Slaughter, V., & Henry, J. D. (2016). Cultural effects on mindreading. Cognition, 146, 410-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.018.
Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V. P., & Paynter, J. (2007). Social maturity and theory of mind in typically developing children and those on the autism spectrum. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(12), 1243-1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01810.x.
Peterson, C. C., & Wellman, H. M. (2019). Longitudinal Theory of Mind (ToM) development from preschool to adolescence with and without ToM delay. Child Development, 90(6), 1917-1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13064.
Peterson, C., Slaughter, V., Moore, C., & Wellman, H. M. (2016). Peer social skills and theory of mind in children with autism, deafness, or typical development. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039833.
Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Rethinking commonsense psychology: A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind, and simulation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139-1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029389.
Ronald, A., Happé, F., & Plomin, R. (2008). A twin study investigating the genetic and environmental aetiologies of parent, teacher and child ratings of autistic-like traits and their overlap. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 17(8), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-008-0689-5.
Ronald, A., Viding, E., Happé, F., & Plomin, R. (2006a). Individual differences in theory of mind ability in middle childhood and links with verbal ability and autistic traits: A twin study. Social Neuroscience, 1(3-4), 412-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601068088.
Ronald, A., Viding, E., Happé, F., & Plomin, R. (2006b). Individual differences in theory of mind ability in middle childhood and links with verbal ability and autistic traits: A twin study. Social Neuroscience, 1(3-4), 412-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601068088.
Rudolph, K. D., Abaied, J. L., Flynn, M., Sugimura, N., & Agoston, A. M. (2011). Developing relationships, being cool, and not looking like a loser: Social goal orientation predicts children's responses to peer aggression: responses to peer aggression. Child Development, 82(5), 1518-1530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01631.x.
Rust, J. (2008). Raven's standard progressive matrices and mill hill vocabulary scale. Pearson Education.
Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1246-1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289345.
Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672-687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.672.
Shiels, K., Hawk Jr., L. W., Lysczek, C. L., Tannock, R., Pelham Jr., W. E., Spencer, S. V., Gangloff, B. P., & Waschbusch, D. A. (2008). The effects of incentives on visual-spatial working memory in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(6), 903-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9221-0.
Slaughter, V., Imuta, K., Peterson, C. C., & Henry, J. D. (2015). Meta-analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child Development, 86(4), 1159-1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12372.
Smith, P. K. (2017). Bullying and theory of mind: A review. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.2174/1573400513666170502123214.
StataCorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.
Todd, A. R., & Simpson, A. J. (2016). Anxiety impairs spontaneous perspective calculation: Evidence from a level-1 visual perspective-taking task. Cognition, 156, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.004.
Weimer, A. A., Parault Dowds, S. J., Fabricius, W. V., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Suh, G. W. (2017). Development of constructivist theory of mind from middle childhood to early adulthood and its relation to social cognition and behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.002.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132444.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202.
White, S., Hill, E., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the strange stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80(4), 1097-1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x.
Yeniad, N., Malda, M., Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pieper, S. (2013). Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: A meta-analytical study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004. - Grant Information: 215006/Z/18/Z United Kingdom WT_ Wellcome Trust
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: adolescence; individual differences; middle childhood; social competence; social motivation; theory of mind
- الموضوع: Date Created: 20210708 Date Completed: 20220307 Latest Revision: 20220307
- الموضوع: 20240829
- الرقم المعرف: 10.1111/desc.13137
- الرقم المعرف: 34235829
- المصدر:
حقوق النشر© 2024، دائرة الثقافة والسياحة جميع الحقوق محفوظة Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [353] | Staff Login
حقوق النشر © دائرة الثقافة والسياحة، جميع الحقوق محفوظة
No Comments.