Sex ratios at birth in Australia according to mother's country of birth: A national study of all 5 614 847 reported live births 1997-2016.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Sex Ratio*; Mothers/*statistics & numerical data ; Parturition/*physiology; Adult ; Asia ; Australian Capital Territory ; China ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; India ; Live Birth ; New South Wales ; Parity ; Sex Distribution ; Sex Preselection/statistics & numerical data ; Victoria ; Western Australia

Objectives: Son preference and sex selective practices have resulted in a deficit of girls in several countries, primarily across Asia. Emerging evidence indicates that son preference survives migration to Western high-income countries. The objective of this study was to assess male-to-female (M/F) ratios at birth per mother's country of birth in Australia 1997-2016, in total and by parity, and by states/territories and over time.
Methods: Data for this national population-based cross-sectional study were obtained from the National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) and included all live births in Australia 1997-2016 (N = 5 614 847). M/F ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals were estimated.
Results: The M/F ratio for births to Australian-born mothers was within the expected range (1.03-1.07) regardless of parity and time period. M/F ratios were elevated above the expected range for births to mothers born in China in the total sample (M/F ratio 1.084, 95% confidence interval 1.071-1.097) and at parity 2 (1.175, 1.120-1.231), and for births to mothers born in India at parity 2 (1.146, 1.090-1.204). Parity 2 births were the most consistently male-biased across time. Across states, elevated M/F ratios were identified for both groups in New South Wales (China parity 2: 1.182, 1.108-1.260; India parity 2: 1.182, 1.088-1.285), for births to Chinese-born mothers in Victoria (total births: 1.097, 1.072-1.123; parity 1: 1.115, 1.072-1.159) and Australian Capital Territory (total births: 1.189, 1.085-1.302) and births to Indian-born mothers Western Australia (parity 2: 1.307, 1.122-1.523).
Conclusions: Son preference persists in some immigrant communities after migration to Australia. The consistent pattern of elevated M/F ratios across the larger states indicates that sex imbalances at birth are largely independent of restrictiveness of local abortion laws. Drivers and consequences of son preference in Western high-income settings should be explored to further promote gender equality, and to strengthen support for women who may be vulnerable to reproductive coercion.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Aug;30(4):329-33. (PMID: 16956161)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 7;116(19):9303-9311. (PMID: 30988199)
J Biosoc Sci. 2010 May;42(3):425-30. (PMID: 20361419)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Feb;56(1):22-8. (PMID: 26817523)
JAMA. 2011 Aug 10;306(6):627-36. (PMID: 21828326)
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):885-905. (PMID: 19110903)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5681-2. (PMID: 18378890)
CMAJ. 2016 Jun 14;188(9):E181-E190. (PMID: 27067818)
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Aug;17(3):125-130. (PMID: 28191222)
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Oct;26(5):421-5. (PMID: 12413285)
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Jan;140:104862. (PMID: 31492545)
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1169-76. (PMID: 21377778)
J Biosoc Sci. 2015 May;47(3):363-75. (PMID: 24849079)
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):2025-2037. (PMID: 30052991)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Aug 03;10:40. (PMID: 20682027)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Aug;48(4):375-83. (PMID: 18837843)
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Jun;20(3):711-716. (PMID: 28434135)
CMAJ Open. 2016 Mar 31;4(2):E116-23. (PMID: 27398354)
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Nov;72(11):1044-1051. (PMID: 29929953)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;34(7):699-709. (PMID: 30891687)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jun;39(6):459-464.e2. (PMID: 28462899)
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jun;31(6):560-5. (PMID: 21442626)
Econ Hum Biol. 2018 May;29:64-75. (PMID: 29482155)
Early Hum Dev. 2017 Jul;110:9-12. (PMID: 28437779)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Apr;55(2):105-11. (PMID: 25871844)
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Mar;40(4):398-407. (PMID: 31499588)
Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):3120-5. (PMID: 10601107)
Genus. 2018;74(1):13. (PMID: 30237588)
Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1921-8. (PMID: 21612820)
CMAJ. 2012 Jun 12;184(9):E492-6. (PMID: 22508977)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):E2102-11. (PMID: 25825766)
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Jan 11;:1-28. (PMID: 33428538)
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Feb;141:104868. (PMID: 31685231)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 5;103(36):13271-5. (PMID: 16938885)
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;176:21-24. (PMID: 28113100)

Date Created: 20210625 Date Completed: 20211027 Latest Revision: 20211027

20231215

PMC8232452

10.1371/journal.pone.0251588

34170929