Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

State Policymaking and Stated Reasons: Prenatal Care for Undocumented Immigrants in an Era of Abortion Restriction.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Fabi RE;Fabi RE; Saloner B; Saloner B; Taylor H; Taylor H
  • المصدر:
    The Milbank quarterly [Milbank Q] 2021 Sep; Vol. 99 (3), pp. 693-720. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 24.
  • نوع النشر :
    Journal Article
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8607003 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-0009 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0887378X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Milbank Q Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Publication: Malden, MA : New York, NY : Blackwell Publishers ; Milbank Memorial Fund
      Original Publication: New York, NY : Published for the Milbank Memorial Fund by Cambridge University Press, c1986-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Policy Points States can create policies that provide access to publicly funded prenatal care for undocumented immigrants that garner support from diverse political coalitions. Policymakers have used a wide range of moral and practical reasons to support the expansion of care to this population, which can be tailored to frame prenatal policies for different stakeholder groups.
      Context: Even though nearly 6% of citizen babies born in the United States have at least one undocumented parent, undocumented immigrants are ineligible for most public health insurance. Prenatal care is a recommended health service that improves birth outcomes, and some states, including both traditionally "blue" and "red" states, have opted to provide publicly funded coverage for prenatal services for people who are otherwise ineligible due to immigration status. This article explores how courts and legislatures in three states have approached the question of publicly funded prenatal care for undocumented immigrants and its relationship to the abortion debate, with a particular focus on the moral and practical justifications that policymakers employ.
      Methods: We employed a review and qualitative analysis of the documents that comprise the legislative histories of prenatal policies in three case states: California, New York, and Nebraska.
      Findings: This review and analysis of policy documents identified moral reasons based on appeals to different conceptions of moral status, respect for autonomy, and justice, as well as prudential reasons that appealed to the health and economic benefits of prenatal care for US citizens and legal residents. We found that much of the variation in reasons supporting policies by state can be traced to the state's position on the protection of reproductive rights and whether the policymakers in each state supported or opposed access to abortion. Interestingly, despite these differences, the states arrived at similar prenatal policies for immigrants.
      Conclusions: There may be areas where policymakers with different political orientations can converge on health policies affecting access to care for undocumented immigrants. Future research should explore the reception of various message frames for expanding public health insurance coverage to immigrants in other contexts.
      (© 2021 The Authors. The Milbank Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Millbank Memorial Fund.)
    • References:
      Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):938-945. (PMID: 29016491)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1656-60. (PMID: 20820022)
      J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003 Oct;28(5):821-58. (PMID: 14604214)
      Fed Regist. 2002 Oct 2;67(191):61955-74. (PMID: 12361063)
      Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2021;31(1):77-99. (PMID: 33716228)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):607-615. (PMID: 28373325)
      Matern Child Health J. 2019 Feb;23(2):173-182. (PMID: 30039326)
      N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):593-5. (PMID: 23883331)
      Health Econ. 2006 May;15(5):461-88. (PMID: 16518834)
      J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Sep;47(3):398-408. (PMID: 31560623)
      Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(10):1695-703. (PMID: 21530038)
      Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Dec;16(6):19-23. (PMID: 3804725)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Medicaid; abortion; pregnancy; prenatal care; reproductive rights; state policy; undocumented immigrants
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20210624 Date Completed: 20211008 Latest Revision: 20220902
    • الموضوع:
      20221213
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC8452360
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1111/1468-0009.12519
    • الرقم المعرف:
      34166528