Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

An Integrated eDiagnosis Approach (IeDA) versus standard IMCI for assessing and managing childhood illness in Burkina Faso: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: The Integrated eDiagnosis Approach (IeDA), centred on an electronic Clinical Decision Support System (eCDSS) developed in line with national Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines, was implemented in primary health facilities of two regions of Burkina Faso. An evaluation was performed using a stepped-wedge cluster randomised design with the aim of determining whether the IeDA intervention increased Health Care Workers' (HCW) adherence to the IMCI guidelines.
      Methods: Ten randomly selected facilities per district were visited at each step by two trained nurses: One observed under-five consultations and the second conducted a repeat consultation. The primary outcomes were: overall adherence to clinical assessment tasks; overall correct classification ignoring the severity of the classifications; and overall correct prescription according to HCWs' classifications. Statistical comparisons between trial arms were performed on cluster/step-level summaries.
      Results: On average, 54 and 79% of clinical assessment tasks were observed to be completed by HCWs in the control and intervention districts respectively (cluster-level mean difference = 29.9%; P-value = 0.002). The proportion of children for whom the validation nurses and the HCWs recorded the same classifications (ignoring the severity) was 73 and 79% in the control and intervention districts respectively (cluster-level mean difference = 10.1%; P-value = 0.004). The proportion of children who received correct prescriptions in accordance with HCWs' classifications were similar across arms, 78% in the control arm and 77% in the intervention arm (cluster-level mean difference = - 1.1%; P-value = 0.788).
      Conclusion: The IeDA intervention improved substantially HCWs' adherence to IMCI's clinical assessment tasks, leading to some overall increase in correct classifications but to no overall improvement in correct prescriptions. The largest improvements tended to be observed for less common conditions. For more common conditions, HCWs in the control districts performed relatively well, thus limiting the scope to detect an overall impact.
      Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02341469 ; First submitted August 272,014, posted January 19, 2015.
    • References:
      Soc Sci Med. 2006 Nov;63(9):2330-40. (PMID: 16887245)
      Am J Public Health. 2009 May;99(5):837-46. (PMID: 19299681)
      J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):4-34. (PMID: 24673171)
      J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 25;15(1):e17. (PMID: 23353680)
      Health Policy Plan. 2011 Sep;26(5):395-404. (PMID: 21047808)
      Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91. (PMID: 16829207)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):822. (PMID: 29237494)
      J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:82-104. (PMID: 22548603)
      Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2487-2500. (PMID: 29635789)
      Implement Sci. 2016 Aug 04;11(1):111. (PMID: 27488566)
      PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207233. (PMID: 30475833)
      Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):1026-35. (PMID: 16168785)
      Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;104:56-63. (PMID: 24581062)
      PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0132316. (PMID: 26161535)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 27;13:95. (PMID: 23981292)
      J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:118-27. (PMID: 22548605)
      Glob Health Action. 2014 Oct 27;7:25606. (PMID: 25361730)
      Stata J. 2019 Dec 1;19(4):803-819. (PMID: 32565746)
      PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 23;14(10):e1002411. (PMID: 29059253)
      Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jun;100(6):565-70. (PMID: 24819369)
      Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i58-i68. (PMID: 16306071)
      Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i5-i17. (PMID: 16306070)
      Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252. (PMID: 30196093)
      Health Policy Plan. 2005 Jan;20(1):14-24. (PMID: 15689426)
      Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2275-86. (PMID: 26361942)
      BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 21;14:188. (PMID: 24555733)
      PLoS One. 2016 Oct 27;11(10):e0165201. (PMID: 27788179)
    • Grant Information:
      OPP1084359 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Burkina Faso; Electronic clinical decision support system; Health care workers’ adherence; Integrated Management of Childhood Illness
    • Molecular Sequence:
      ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02341469
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20210417 Date Completed: 20210514 Latest Revision: 20210514
    • الموضوع:
      20240628
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC8052659
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12913-021-06317-3
    • الرقم المعرف:
      33863326