Wellbeing Literacy: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Preliminary Empirical Findings from Students, Parents and School Staff.

Publisher: MDPI Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101238455 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1660-4601 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16604601 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Environ Res Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Basel : MDPI, c2004-

Concept Formation* ; Health Literacy*; Australia ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Schools ; Students ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Aims: Wellbeing literacy is the intentional use of wellbeing relevant vocabulary, knowledge and language skills to maintain or improve the wellbeing of oneself, others and the world. In this study, we operationalize the human aspects of the concept of wellbeing literacy and empirically test its relationship with wellbeing and illbeing. We also assess its incremental variance in wellbeing and illbeing, after controlling for existing and well-established predictors of these constructs within education settings.
Methods: We developed and empirically tested the Wellbeing literacy 6-item (Well-Lit 6) scale to assess the concept of wellbeing literacy in the education context. The scale was developed based on a working definition of wellbeing literacy, in combination with the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA)'s definition of literacy. The Well-Lit 6 was administered via a cross-sectional survey to three Australian samples that comprise different elements of Australian education systems: students ( N = 1392), parents ( N = 584) and school staff ( N = 317).
Results: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) suggested the six items of the Well-Lit 6 form an independent construct, empirically distinguishable from other wellbeing-related constructs (e.g., general wellbeing, resilience, and emotion regulation). Convergent analyses showed wellbeing literacy was positively related to wellbeing and negatively related to illbeing. Incremental validity analyses showed wellbeing literacy predicted variance in wellbeing and illbeing after controlling for participant demographics, resilience, and emotion regulation, showing initial evidence of incremental validity.
Conclusions: Our results provide preliminary evidence that wellbeing literacy is a distinct construct from wellbeing and illbeing, and it also demonstrates significant unique variance in these constructs over and above resilience and emotion regulation. The Well-Lit 6 is a useful provisional measure of wellbeing literacy, although we suggest a fruitful avenue for future research is to develop a more comprehensive scale of wellbeing literacy that denotes specific facets of communication, allowing a fuller exploration wellbeing literacy, its components, and their antecedents and consequences. We offer further recommendations for future research and discuss limitations with our approach.

Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 29;7:1873. (PMID: 28018251)
Psychother Psychosom. 2006;75(2):85-95. (PMID: 16508343)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 14;16(24):. (PMID: 31847426)
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;177:396-401. (PMID: 11059991)
Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21. (PMID: 19996233)
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;32:92-99. (PMID: 30057066)
Psychol Assess. 2003 Dec;15(4):456-66. (PMID: 14692842)
Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):361-8. (PMID: 19485613)
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Oct;74(10):1742-1758. (PMID: 29687455)
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):5-14. (PMID: 11392865)
Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105. (PMID: 13634291)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. (PMID: 12916575)
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80. (PMID: 22276600)
Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):576-9. (PMID: 20019249)
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. (PMID: 6668417)
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. (PMID: 21768583)
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Jan;67(1):99-110. (PMID: 20973032)
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. (PMID: 18696313)
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 20;18(6):e165. (PMID: 27323907)
J Sch Nurs. 2008 Apr;24(2):66-70. (PMID: 18363440)
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(4):657-78. (PMID: 25995305)
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-8. (PMID: 18952344)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 15;18(2):. (PMID: 33467630)
Med J Aust. 1997 Feb 17;166(4):182-6. (PMID: 9066546)
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. (PMID: 14516251)
J Psychol. 2016 Oct 2;150(7):809-21. (PMID: 27419659)
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1295-307. (PMID: 26162954)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):. (PMID: 32751837)
Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):766-794. (PMID: 10560328)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):. (PMID: 33086643)
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):1712. (PMID: 31856772)
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Mar;26(1):151-60. (PMID: 21627673)
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Jun;43(2):207-22. (PMID: 12096700)
Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(S7):S26-30. (PMID: 17908021)

Keywords: educational context; measurement; public health; wellbeing; wellbeing literacy

Date Created: 20210209 Date Completed: 20210427 Latest Revision: 20210427

20221213

PMC7915895

10.3390/ijerph18041485

33557351