Marijuana Use Among Justice-Involved Youths After California Statewide Legalization, 2015-2018.

Publisher: American Public Health Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 1254074 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1541-0048 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00900036 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am J Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: Washington, DC : American Public Health Association
Original Publication: New York [etc.]

Adolescent Behavior*; Marijuana Use/*epidemiology ; Marijuana Use/*legislation & jurisprudence; Adolescent ; California/epidemiology ; Criminals/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Legislation, Drug ; Male ; Pennsylvania/epidemiology ; Young Adult

Objectives. To determine the impact of California's recreational marijuana legalization on marijuana use among justice system-involved (JSI) adolescents and young adults, and to distinguish whether any changes resulted from legalization (passing the law) or from implementation of the law. Methods. We compared changes in JSI youths' marijuana use in 2 states: California (n = 504), where recreational marijuana use was recently legalized, and Pennsylvania (n = 478), where recreational use is still prohibited. Furthermore, we examined changes in marijuana use across 3 key time periods (October 2015-June 2018): before legalization, after legalization but before implementation, and after implementation. Results. California JSI youths did not demonstrate a significant increase in marijuana use after legalization (b = -0.010; P  = .950) or implementation (b = -0.046; P  = .846). However, in Pennsylvania, rates of marijuana use increased significantly after legalization (b = 0.602; P  = .001) but not after implementation (b = 0.174; P  = .533). Conclusions. Although recreational marijuana legalization was not associated with changes in marijuana use among youths in California, we observed increased rates of use in Pennsylvania after legalization in California. Recreational marijuana laws may be indirectly related to youths' marijuana use by supporting more permissive national attitudes toward marijuana.

Comment in: Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1268-1269. (PMID: 32783708)
Comment in: Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1270-1271. (PMID: 32783732)

Am J Addict. 2015 Mar;24(2):160-165. (PMID: 25864605)
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):336-44. (PMID: 25662893)
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Sep 1;68(1):49-64. (PMID: 12167552)
Front Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 01;4:53. (PMID: 23847550)
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;171(2):142-149. (PMID: 28027345)
Am J Public Health. 2017 Feb;107(2):246-247. (PMID: 28075636)
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):887-92. (PMID: 9618614)
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;32(1):84-92. (PMID: 29144146)
Subst Use Misuse. 2006;41(5):743-50. (PMID: 16603458)
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005 Jan;24(1):39-48. (PMID: 16191720)
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Jul;28(7):1356-65. (PMID: 12784123)
Am J Public Health. 1999 Oct;89(10):1549-54. (PMID: 10511838)
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59(6):618-627. (PMID: 28714184)
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Nov;100(4):449-63. (PMID: 1757658)
Future Child. 2008 Fall;18(2):165-83. (PMID: 21338002)
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):1992-2001. (PMID: 28613454)
Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;148:1-16. (PMID: 25460036)
Br Med Bull. 2007;81-82:21-37. (PMID: 17284541)
PLoS Med. 2008 Jul 1;5(7):e141. (PMID: 18597549)
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26(2):135-42. (PMID: 25168081)
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;48(6):592-600. (PMID: 17537075)
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 1;173(9):879-881. (PMID: 31282944)
Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:255-259. (PMID: 29107203)
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jun;97(6):607-15. (PMID: 25777798)
Prev Med Rep. 2016 May 28;4:134-41. (PMID: 27413674)
Prev Med. 2016 Sep;90:114-20. (PMID: 27373208)

Date Created: 20200717 Date Completed: 20201109 Latest Revision: 20220902

20221213

PMC7427206

10.2105/AJPH.2020.305797

32673115