Visibly constraining an agent modulates observers' automatic false-belief tracking.

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-

Reaction Time* ; Social Perception* ; Theory of Mind*; Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Restraint, Physical/psychology ; Young Adult

Our motor system can generate representations which carry information about the goals of another agent's actions. However, it is not known whether motor representations play a deeper role in social understanding, and, in particular, whether they enable tracking others' beliefs. Here we show that, for adult observers, reliably manifesting an ability to track another's false belief critically depends on representing the agent's potential actions motorically. One signature of motor representations is that they can be disrupted by constraints on an observed agent's action capacities. We therefore used a 'mummification' technique to manipulate whether the agent in a visual ball-detection task was free to act or whether he was visibly constrained from acting. Adults' reaction times reliably reflected the agent's beliefs only when the agent was free to act on the ball and not when the agent was visibly constrained from acting. Furthermore, it was the agent's constrained action capabilities, rather than any perceptual novelty, that determined whether adult observers' reaction times reliably reflected the agent's beliefs. These findings signal that our motor system may underpin more of social cognition than previously imagined, and, in particular, that motor representations may underpin automatic false-belief tracking.

Cohen, R. G. & Rosenbaum, D. A. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Exp. Brain. Res. 157, 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9 (2004). (PMID: 10.1007/s00221-004-1862-915071711)
Kawato, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 (1999). (PMID: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-810607637)
Weigelt, M., Kunde, W. & Prinz, W. End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Exp. Psychol. 53, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.143 (2006). (PMID: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.14316909939)
Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. The mirror mechanism: A basic principle of brain function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.135 (2016). (PMID: 10.1038/nrn.2016.13527761004)
Buccino, G. et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x (2001). (PMID: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x11168545)
Cattaneo, L. & Rizzolatti, G. The mirror neuron system. Arch. Neurol. 66, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.41 (2009). (PMID: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.4119433654)
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. & Rizzolatti, G. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. J. Neurophysiol. 7, 2608–2611. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608 (1995). (PMID: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608)
Urgesi, C., Moro, V., Candidi, M. & Aglioti, S. M. Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. J. Neurosci. 26, 7942–7949. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1289-06.2006 (2006). (PMID: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1289-06.2006168707396674209)
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. & Prinz, W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn. 44, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1225 (2000). (PMID: 10.1006/brcg.2000.122511041986)
Cracco, E. et al. Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 144, 453–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000143 (2018). (PMID: 10.1037/bul000014329517262)
Iacoboni, M. et al. Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 3, 0529–0535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079 (2005). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079)
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C. & Committeri, G. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Exp. Brain Res. 207, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8 (2010). (PMID: 10.1007/s00221-010-2435-820931177)
Costantini, M., Committeri, G. & Sinigaglia, C. Ready both to your and to my hands: Mapping the action space of others. PLoS ONE 6, e17923. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017923 (2011). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017923214837343070696)
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. Favouritism in the motor system: Social interaction modulates action simulation. Biol. Lett. 6, 758–761. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478 (2010). (PMID: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478205736163001385)
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L. & Oliver, E. Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.013 (2005). (PMID: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.01315831405)
Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2805 (2010). (PMID: 10.1038/nrn280520216547)
Cattaneo, L., Caruana, F., Jezzini, A. & Rizzolatti, G. Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J. Neurosci. 29, 11134–11138. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2605-09.2009 (2009). (PMID: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2605-09.2009197411196665924)
Betti, S., Castiello, U. & Sartori, L. Kick with the finger: Symbolic actions shape motor cortex excitability. Eur. J. Neurosci. 42, 2860–2866. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13067 (2015). (PMID: 10.1111/ejn.1306726354677)
Senna, I., Bolognini, N. & Maravita, A. Grasping with the foot: Goal and motor expertise in action observation. Hum. Brain. Mapp. 35, 1750–1760. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22289 (2014). (PMID: 10.1002/hbm.2228923671004)
Triberti, S., Repetto, C., Costantini, M., Riva, G. & Sinigaglia, C. Press to grasp: How action dynamics shape object categorization. Exp. Brain Res. 243, 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4446-y (2016). (PMID: 10.1007/s00221-015-4446-y)
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060 (2001). (PMID: 10.1038/3509006011533734)
Liepelt, R. et al. Contextual movement constraints of others modulate motor preparation in the observer. Neuropsychologia 47, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.008 (2009). (PMID: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.00818680755)
Butterfill, S. A. & Apperly, I. A. Is goal ascription possible in minimal mindreading?. Psychol. Rev. 123, 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000022 (2016). (PMID: 10.1037/rev000002226901746)
Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y. & Brass, M. Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Hum. Brain. Mapp. 30, 3704–3718. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20800 (2009). (PMID: 10.1002/hbm.20800195175306870802)
Santiesteban, I. et al. Training social cognition: From imitation to theory of mind. Cognition 122, 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.004 (2012). (PMID: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.00422133627)
Bardi, L. & Brass, M. The control of shared representations and social cognition. In Shared Representations Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life (eds Obhi, S. S. & Cross, E. S.) 51–170 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016).
Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Begliomini, C., Sartori, L., Feltrin, G. & Castiello, U. Social grasping: From mirroring to mentalizing. NeuroImage 61, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.013 (2012).
Cavallo, A., Koul, A., Ansuini, C., Capozzi, F. & Becchio, C. Decoding intentions from movement kinematics. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37036 (2016). (PMID: 10.1038/srep37036)
Koul, A., Soriano, M., Tversky, B., Becchio, C. & Cavallo. A. The kinematics that you do not expect: Integrating prior information and kinematics to understand intentions. Cognition 182, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.006 (2019).
Kovács, A. M., Téglás, E. & Endress, A. D. The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science 330, 1830–1834. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190792 (2010). (PMID: 10.1126/science.119079221205671)
Bardi, L., Six, P. & Brass, M. Repetitive TMS of the temporo-parietal junction disrupts participant’s expectations in a spontaneous theory of mind task. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 1775–1782. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx109 (2017). (PMID: 10.1093/scan/nsx109289819145691804)
Bardi, L., Desmet, C. & Brass, M. Spontaneous theory of mind is reduced for nonhuman-like agents as compared to human-like agents. Psychol. Res. 83, 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1000-0 (2019). (PMID: 10.1007/s00426-018-1000-029663132)
Deschrijver, E., Bardi, L., Wiersema, J. R. & Brass, M. Behavioral measures of implicit theory of mind in adults with high functioning autism. Cogn. Neurosci. 7, 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1085375 (2016). (PMID: 10.1080/17588928.2015.108537526368309)
Edwards, K. & Low, J. Level 2 perspective-taking distinguishes automatic and non-automatic belief-tracking. Cognition 193, 104017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104017 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.10401731271926)
El Kaddouri, R., Bardi, L., De Bremaeker, D., Brass, M. & Wiersema, J.R. Measuring spontaneous mentalizing with a ball detection task putting the attention-check hypothesis by Phillips and colleagues to the (2015) test. Psychol. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01181-7 .
Nijhof, A. D., Brass, M. & Wiersema, J. R. Spontaneous mentalizing in neurotypicals scoring high versus low on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res. 258, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.060 (2017). (PMID: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.06028972889)
Costantini, M. & Sinigaglia, C. Grasping affordance: A window onto social cognition. In Joint Attention: New Developments (ed Seemann A.). 431–459 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2011).
Gallese, V. Bodily selves in relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369, 177. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0177 (2014). (PMID: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0177)
Gallese, V. & Sinigaglia, C. The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia 48, 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.038 (2010). (PMID: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.03819835895)
JASP team. JASP (Version 0.12.2) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/ (2020).
Wagenmakers, E. J. et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7 (2018). (PMID: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-728685272)
Jeffreys, H. Theory of Probability 3rd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961).
Kühn, S., Gevers, W. & Brass, M. The neural correlates of intending not to do something. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 1913–1920. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90994.2008 (2009). (PMID: 10.1152/jn.90994.200819164107)
Maranesi, M., Livi, A., Fogassi, L., Rizzolatti, G. & Bonini, L. Mirror neuron activation prior to action observation in a predictable context. J. Neurosci. 34, 14827–14832. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2705-14.2014 (2014). (PMID: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2705-14.2014253781506608372)
Amiez, C., Procyk, E., Honore, J., Sequeira, H. & Joseph, J. P. Reward anticipation, cognition, and electrodermal activity in the conditioned monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 149, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1353-9 (2003). (PMID: 10.1007/s00221-002-1353-912632229)
de Gee, J. W., Knapen, T. & Donner, T. H. Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E618–E625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317557111 (2014). (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.131755711124449874)
Richer, F., Silverman, C. & Beatty, J. Response selection and initiation in speeded reactions: A pupillometric analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 9, 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.360 (1983). (PMID: 10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.3606223976)
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 (1983). (PMID: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-56681741)
Pelosin, E. et al. Postural stabilization strategies to motor contagion induced by action observation are impaired in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neurol. 9, 105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00105 (2018). (PMID: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00105295457715837984)
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 (2007). (PMID: 10.3758/BF031931461769534317695343)

Date Created: 20200711 Date Completed: 20201231 Latest Revision: 20210709

20221213

PMC7347931

10.1038/s41598-020-68240-7

32647240