Quality of clinicians' conversations with patients and families before and after implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program in a hospital setting: a retrospective chart review study.

Publisher: Canadian Medical Association Country of Publication: Canada NLM ID: 101620603 Publication Model: Electronic-Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2291-0026 (Print) Linking ISSN: 22910026 NLM ISO Abbreviation: CMAJ Open

Original Publication: Ottawa : Canadian Medical Association, [2013]-[2023]

Communication* ; Critical Care*/methods ; Critical Care*/statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals* ; Physician-Patient Relations*; Critical Illness/*epidemiology; Advance Care Planning ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Plan Implementation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Care ; Patient Care Planning ; Retrospective Studies

Background: Seriously ill patients in hospital have indicated that better communication with practitioners is vital for improving care. The aim of this study was to assess whether the quality of conversations about serious illness improved after implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP).
Methods: In this retrospective chart review study, we evaluated patients who were admitted to a medical ward at Hamilton General Hospital, had a stay of at least 48 hours, and were at risk for a lengthy stay or increased need for community-based services (inter-RAI Emergency Department Screener score of 5 or 6). The SICP study period was from Mar. 1, 2017, to Jan. 19, 2018. We used a validated codebook to assess the quality of documented conversations regarding serious illness for eligible patients before (usual care [control group]) and after SICP implementation (intervention group), specifically examining the following domains: patients' values and goals, understanding of prognosis and illness, end-of-life care planning, and code status or desire for other life-sustaining treatments.
Results: The study sample included 56 patients in the control group and 56 patients in the intervention group. The overall quality of documented conversations about serious illness was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group ( p < 0.001) and was significantly higher in the subdomains of values and goals ( p < 0.001), understanding of prognosis and illness ( p < 0.001) and life-sustaining treatments ( p = 0.03) but not end-of-life care planning ( p = 0.48).
Interpretation: Implementation of the SICP in a hospital setting was associated with higher quality of documented conversations regarding serious illness with patients at high risk for clinical or functional deterioration. The SICP is transferable and adaptable to a hospital setting, and was associated with an increase in adherence to best practices compared to usual care.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.)

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):778-87. (PMID: 23545563)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Sep;25(9):671-9. (PMID: 26554026)
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):861-7. (PMID: 20618087)
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1;154(5):336-46. (PMID: 21357911)
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. (PMID: 3558716)
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):751-759. (PMID: 30870563)
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):801-809. (PMID: 30870556)
Open Med. 2009 Jun 16;3(2):e101-10. (PMID: 19946391)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 1;36(7):1258-1264. (PMID: 28679813)
CMAJ. 2014 Dec 9;186(18):E679-87. (PMID: 25367427)
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1994-2003. (PMID: 25330167)
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Feb;5(2):195-204. (PMID: 20089488)
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 06;5(10):e009032. (PMID: 26443662)

Date Created: 20200621 Date Completed: 20210215 Latest Revision: 20210215

20240628

PMC7850172

10.9778/cmajo.20190193

32561591