Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Mass Screening* ; Parents*; Child Development/*physiology ; Developmental Disabilities/*diagnosis ; Mothers/*statistics & numerical data; Child, Preschool ; China/epidemiology ; Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Pregnancy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Choosing a valid and feasible method to measure child developmental outcomes is key to addressing developmental delays, which have been shown to be associated with high levels of unemployment, participation in crime, and teen pregnancies. However, measuring early childhood development (ECD) with multi-dimensional diagnostic tests such as the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III (Bayley-III) can be time-consuming and expensive; therefore, parental screening tools such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) are frequently an alternative measure of early childhood development in large-scale research. The ASQ is also becoming more frequently used as the first step to identify children at risk for developmental delays before conducting a diagnostic test to confirm. However, the effectiveness of the ASQ-3 is uncertain. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of the ASQ-3 as a screening measure for children at risk of developmental delay in rural China by age group. To do so, we administered the Bayley-III, widely considered to be the "gold standard" of ECD diagnostic tests, to a sample of 1,831 five to twenty-four month-old children and also administered the ASQ-3 to their caregivers. We then compared the outcomes of the ASQ-3 test to those of the Bayley-III. We find that the ASQ-3 was significantly though weakly correlated with the Bayley-III and that the strength of this correlation increased with child age and was stronger when the mother was the primary caregiver (as compared to the grandmother). We also find that the sensitivity and specificity of ASQ-3 ranged widely. The overall findings suggest that the ASQ-3 may not be a very accurate screening tool for identifying developmentally delayed children, especially for children under 13 months of age or children whose primary caregiver is not the mother.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Dec;42(6):1432-43. (PMID: 10599625)
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):1061-71. (PMID: 15482073)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10155-10162. (PMID: 16801553)
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jul;42(4):627-42. (PMID: 16802896)
Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):60-70. (PMID: 17208643)
Pediatrics. 2007 Aug;120(2):381-9. (PMID: 17671065)
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jul;36(4):485-90. (PMID: 20030657)
Econometrica. 2010 May 1;78(3):883-931. (PMID: 20563300)
J Perinatol. 2011 Oct;31(10):641-6. (PMID: 21311498)
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Sep;32(7):499-511. (PMID: 21760526)
Lancet. 2011 Oct 8;378(9799):1325-38. (PMID: 21944375)
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Feb;101(2):e55-8. (PMID: 22054168)
Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;35(3):369-74. (PMID: 22506146)
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e108-14. (PMID: 22689873)
Quant Econom. 2010;1(1):1-46. (PMID: 23255883)
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1468-74. (PMID: 23629619)
JAMA. 2013 May 1;309(17):1810-20. (PMID: 23632725)
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Nov;55(11):978-9. (PMID: 23930736)
Science. 2014 May 30;344(6187):998-1001. (PMID: 24876490)
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113360. (PMID: 25423589)
Early Hum Dev. 2015 Mar;91(3):217-25. (PMID: 25703316)
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Apr;30(4):450-5. (PMID: 25829813)
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 22;11(8):e0160962. (PMID: 27548634)
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jan;43(1):1-17. (PMID: 27554865)
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):77-90. (PMID: 27717614)
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170171. (PMID: 28151969)
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(6):458-467. (PMID: 31107768)

Date Created: 20190906 Date Completed: 20200319 Latest Revision: 20200319

20240628

PMC6728026

10.1371/journal.pone.0221675

31487302