Injury patterns associated with personal mobility devices and electric bicycles: an analysis from an acute general hospital in Singapore.

Publisher: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Country of Publication: India NLM ID: 0404516 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0037-5675 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00375675 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Singapore Med J Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: July 2022- : [Mumbai] : Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Original Publication: Singapore, Singapore Medical Assn.

Motorcycles*; Bicycling/*statistics & numerical data ; Computers, Handheld/*statistics & numerical data ; Wounds and Injuries/*epidemiology ; Wounds and Injuries/*etiology; Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Electricity ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Singapore/epidemiology ; Young Adult

Introduction: The increasing popularity of personal mobility devices (PMDs) and electric bicycles (e-bikes) in Singapore has met with growing public concern over safety. Following the passing of the Active Mobility Bill, there remains a gap in the local literature in terms of injury patterns arising from the use of these devices.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on the Singapore National Trauma Registry (SNTR) from the emergency department of an acute hospital from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016. All patients with injuries related to the use of PMDs and e-bikes were included. Data captured included demographic information, device used and injury severity score (ISS).
Results: The 259 patients identified had a mean age of 32.1 years and a male predominance. Most (83.4%) were injured from falling off their devices. Devices commonly associated with injury were scooters, skateboards and motorised bicycles. Most injuries were mild (94.6%, ISS < 9) and were mainly external wounds (89.2%) and upper and lower limb injuries (35.5%). There was no difference in ISS in terms of the device used (motorised vs. non-motorised). More severe injuries (ISS ≥ 9) were caused by e-bikes (42.9%) and electric scooters (28.6%). Factors associated with these injuries were older age, use of e-bikes, and injuries to the head, face and thorax. Most patients (86.1%) were discharged and one died.
Conclusion: While most injuries associated with PMDs and e-bikes are minor, serious injuries could result from their use. The SNTR should be updated to include PMDs and e-bikes as a category.
(Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.)

Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:850236. (PMID: 24778880)
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:47-52. (PMID: 25173724)
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Aug;28(4):425-33. (PMID: 27400755)
Adv Prev Med. 2013;2013:450195. (PMID: 24205441)
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):379-82. (PMID: 19084788)
Prev Sci. 2006 Sep;7(3):313-20. (PMID: 16773455)

Keywords: electric bicycles; personal mobility devices; registry; scooters; trauma

Date Created: 20190801 Date Completed: 20210331 Latest Revision: 20210331

20221213

PMC7052006

10.11622/smedj.2019084

31363783