Evidence-based medicine-Not a panacea for the problems of a complex adaptive world.

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9609066 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2753 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13561294 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Eval Clin Pract Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Oxford, England : Wiley-Blackwell, c1995-

Biomedical Research*/ethics ; Biomedical Research*/standards ; Clinical Decision-Making* ; Evidence-Based Medicine*/ethics ; Evidence-Based Medicine*/methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine*/standards ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care*/ethics ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care*/methods ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care*/standards ; Patient Care Planning* ; Quality of Health Care*; Standard of Care/*ethics; Humans ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Models, Statistical ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards ; Research Design

The recent sacking of Peter Gøtzsche from the Cochrane Collaboration Board raised strong responses and highlights the neglected issue about priorities-maintaining the reputation of the organization or vigorously debating the merits of scientific approaches to find answers to complex problems? The Cochrane approach hales the randomized trial (RCT) as the gold standard research approach and affirms that meta-analysis provides the ultimate proof (or platinum standard) to settle contentious issues confronting the clinician. However, most published medical research is wrong, and critics coined the acronym GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) as a meme to highlight the risks of blind faith in the hyped-up procedures of the EBM movement. This paper firstly explores the differences between the prevailing scientific method arising from the linear cause-and-effect assumption and the complex adaptive systems science methods arising from observations that most phenomena emerge from nonlinearity in networked systems. Most medical conditions are characterized by necessary features that by themselves are not sufficient to explain their nature and behaviour. Such nonlinear phenomena require modelling approaches rather than linear statistical and/or meta-analysis approaches to be understood. These considerations also highlight that research is largely stuck at the data and information levels of understanding which fails clinicians who depend on knowledge-the synthesis of information-to apply in an adaptive way in the clinical encounter. Clinicians are constantly confronted with the linked challenges of doing things right and doing the right thing for their patients. EBM and Cochrane with their restrictive approaches are the antithesis to a practice of medicine that is responsive to constantly changing patient needs. As such, the EBM/Cochrane crisis opens a window of opportunity to re-examine the nature of health, illness and disease, and the nature of health care and its systems for the benefits of its professionals and their patients. We are at the cusp of a paradigmatic shift towards an understanding a praxis of health care that takes account of its complexities.
(© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Hawkes N. Cochrane director's expulsion results in four board members resigning. BMJ. 2018;362:k3945.
Sturmberg J, Topolski S. For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(5):1017-1025.
Ioannidis JPA. Cochrane crisis: secrecy, intolerance and evidence-based values. Eur J Clin Invest. 2018:e13058. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13058.
Hayes MJ, Kaestner V, Mailankody S, Prasad V. Most medical practices are not parachutes: a citation analysis of practices felt by biomedical authors to be analogous to parachutes. CMAJ Open. 2018;6(1):E31-E38.
Stegenga J. Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence? Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011;42(4):497-507.
Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2(8):e124.
Snowden D. Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. J Knowl Manag. 2002;6(2):100-111.
Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. Knowing-in medicine. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(5):767-770.
Salvador-Carulla L, Fernandez A, Madden R, et al. Framing of scientific knowledge as a new category of health care research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):1045-1055.
Sturmberg JP. Knowledge translation in healthcare-towards understanding its true complexities; comment on “using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation”. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2018;7(5):455-458.
Sturmberg JP. EBM: a narrow and obsessive methodology that fails to meet the knowledge needs of a complex adaptive clinical world: a commentary on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H. & Ashcroft, R. E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(6):917-923.
Fernandez A, Sturmberg J, Lukersmith S, et al. Evidence-based medicine: is it a bridge too far? Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):66.
Kelly T. Evidence. 2016. In: the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [internet]. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence/: metaphysics research lab, Stanford University.
Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1972.
Lakatos I. Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1976.
Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.
Feyerabend P. Against Method. London, New York: Verso Books; 1975.
West BJ. Simplifiying Complexity. Life is Uncertain, Unfair and Unequal. Sharjah, UEA: Bentham e-Books; 2016.
West BJ. Homeostasis and gauss statistics: barriers to understanding natural variability. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(3):403-408.
West BJ. Mathematical principles: tales of tails. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, eds. editorsHandbook of Systems and Complexity in Health. New York: Springer; 2013:63-80.
Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
Rothman KJ. Causes. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;104(6):587-592.
Gigerenzer G. Statistical rituals: the replication delusion and how we got there. Adv Methods Pract Psych Sci. 2018;1(2):198-218.
Gigerenzer G, Swijtink Z, Porter T, Daston L, Beatty J, Krüger L. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
McShane BB, Ga D, Gelman A, Robert C, Tackett JL. Abandon statistical significance. The American Statistician. 2019:in press.
Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58(5):295-300.
Moynihan R. Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences. Br Med J. 2011;343(aug15 1):d5160.
Kemp R, Prasad V. Surrogate endpoints in oncology: when are they acceptable for regulatory and clinical decisions, and are they currently overused? BMC Med. 2017;15(1):134.
Sturmberg JP. The personal nature of health. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):766-769.
Sturmberg JP. Health: a personal complex-adaptive state. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, eds. Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health. New York: Springer; 2014:231-242.
Sturmberg JP, Picard M, Aron DC, Bennett JM, Bircher J, deHaven MJ, et al. Health and disease-emergent states resulting from adaptive social and biological network interactions. A Framework for Debate. Frontiers in Medicine. 2018:forthcoming.
Silva SA, Wyer PC. Where is the wisdom? II-Evidence-based medicine and the epistemological crisis in clinical medicine. Exposition and commentary on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H. & Ashcroft, R. E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(6):899-906.
Sturmberg JP, Bennett JM, Picard M, Seely AJE. The trajectory of life. Decreasing physiological network complexity through changing fractal patterns. Front Physiol. 2015;6:169.
Bennett JM, Reeves G, Billman G, Sturmberg JP. Inflammation, nature's way to efficiently respond to all types of challenges: implications for understanding and managing “the epidemic” of chronic diseases. Front Med. 2018;5:316.
McWhinney IR. An acquaintance with particulars. Fam Med. 1989;21(4):296-298.
Tanenbaum SJ. Particularism in health care: challenging the authority of the aggregate. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):934-941.
Stange KC. Ways of knowing, learning, and developing. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(1):4-10.
Healy P. Rethinking the doctor-patient relationship: toward a hermeneutically-informed epistemology of medical practice. Med Health Care Philos. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9875-5.
Centor RM. To be a great physician, you must understand the whole story. Medscape Gen Med. 2007;9(1):59.
Ellis GFR. Top-down causation and emergence: some comments on mechanisms. Interface Focus. 2012;2(1):126-140.
Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. Diagnosis-the limiting focus of taxonomy. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):103-111.
Sturmberg JP. The illusion of certainty-a deluded perception? J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(3):507-510.
Scott JG. Complexities of the consultation. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, eds. Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health. New York: Springer; 2013:257-277.
Fugelli P. Clinical practice: between Aristotle and Cochrane. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998;128(6):184-188.
Upshur REG. Looking for rules in a world of exceptions: reflections on evidence-based practice. Perspect Biol Med. 2005;48(4):477-489.
Furberg BD, Furberg CD. Why is benefit-to-harm balance essential to treatment decisions? In: Furberg BD, Furberg CD, eds. Evaluating Clinical Research. New York: Springer; 2007.
Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(2):274-286.
Gluckman P. Making Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty: Understanding Risk. Part 2. Auckland, New Zealand: Office of the Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor; 2016 Available from.
Sturmberg JP, Cilliers P. Time and the consultation-an argument for a ‘certain slowness’. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(5):881-885.
Sturmberg J. Is quality of care only instrumental? Ann Intern Med. 2009;160(4):417-418.
Sturmberg JP, O'Halloran DM, Martin CM. People at the centre of complex adaptive health systems reform. Med J Aust. 2010;193(8):474-478.
Sturmberg JP. Health System Redesign. How to Make Health Care Person-Centered, Equitable, and Sustainable. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018.
Andriani P, McKelvey B. Perspective-from Gaussian to Paretian thinking: causes and implications of power laws in organizations. Organization Science. 2009;20(6):1053-1071.
Cochrane. Cochrane website. 2018. https://www.cochrane.org/about-us.
Heifetz R. Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
Heifetz R, Grashow A, Linsky M. The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and the World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2009.
Vogus TJ, Rothman NB, Sutcliffe KM, Weick KE. The affective foundations of high-reliability organizing. J Organ Behav. 2014;35:(4):592-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.922.
Lotrecchiano GR, Misra S. A Systems Perspective for Measuring Features of Transdisciplinary Knowledge Producing Teams (TDKPTs). In: Sturmberg JP, ed. Embracing Complexity in Health the Transformation of Science, Practice, and Policy. Cham: Switzerland: in press; 2019.
Cochrane. Statement from Cochrane's Governing Board-26th September 2018.2018: https://www.cochrane.org/news/statement-cochranes-governing-board-26th-september-2018.
Gøtzsche PC. Cochrane-no longer a collaboration. 2018;(9-Nov-2018): https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/11/08/peter-c-gotzsche-cochrane-no-longer-a-collaboration/.
Gartlehner G, Hammerstein D, Meerpohl J, Santesso N. Why we resigned. 2018;(15-Sep-2018): https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjebmspotlight/files/2018/09/Why-we-resigned.pdf.
Jefferson T. How Cochrane is doing pharma a good turn. 2018;(12-Nov-2018): https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/11/12/tom-jefferson-cochrane-pharma-good-turn/.
Moynihan R. Let's stop the burning and the bleeding at Cochrane-there's too much at stake. 2018;(17-Sep-2018): https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/09/17/ray-moynihan-lets-stop-the-burning-and-the-bleeding-at-cochrane-theres-too-much-at-stake/.
Greenhalgh T. The Cochrane collaboration-what crisis? 2018;(17-Sep-2018): https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/09/17/trish-greenhalgh-the-cochrane-collaboration-what-crisis/.
Godlee F. Reinvigorating Cochrane. BMJ. 2018;362.
Bastian H. Boilover: the Cochrane HPV vaccine fire isn't really about the evidence-but it's critical to science. 2018;(18-Sep-2018): https://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-maybe/2018/09/18/boilover-the-cochrane-hpv-vaccine-fire-isnt-really-about-the-evidence-but-its-critical-to-science/.
Enserink M. Evidence-based medicine group expels internal critic. Science. 2018;361(6408):1173-1174.
Healy D. The crisis in Cochrane: evidence debased medicine. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 2018:Online First.
Pellegrino E, Thomasma D. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. Towards a Philosophy and Ethic of the Healing Professions. New York Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1981.

Date Created: 20190320 Date Completed: 20200625 Latest Revision: 20200625

20221213

10.1111/jep.13122

30887648