Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Effect of Macular Vascular Density on Central Visual Function and Macular Structure in Glaucoma Patients.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Jeon SJ;Jeon SJ; Park HL; Park HL; Park CK; Park CK
  • المصدر:
    Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2018 Oct 30; Vol. 8 (1), pp. 16009. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 30.
  • نوع النشر :
    Journal Article
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      In patients with glaucomatous parafoveal scotoma, evidence of compromised vascular circulation was commonly seen. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between macular vascular density (VD) and central visual function and structure in glaucoma patients. We enrolled 46 eyes of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients with parafoveal scotoma. All subjects underwent measurement of segmented macular thickness in each layer and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) to assess VD of macula. Correlation coefficients of VD with structural parameters were identified and multivariate regression analyses were performed to verify factors affecting the MD of SITA 10-2. Superficial VD in NFL, GCL and IPL showed significant correlation with thickness of those layers, but deep VD in INL did not show meaningful correlation with any structural parameters. However, deep VD showed significant correlations with central visual field parameters such as MD of SITA 10-2. By multivariate regression analysis, the significant factors affecting central visual function were deep VD. Different multivariate regression models including segmented macular thicknesses were compared and R 2 value was best for the model with deep VD, not containing superficial VD (R 2  = 0.326, p = 0.001). Assigning subjects as worse or better visual functional group using regression line, deep VD of worse functional group was significantly lower than that of better group. In couclusion, decreased deep VD was an independent risk factor for central scotoma in addition to structural thinning. Taking both macular thickness and vascular circulation into acount, the deterioration of central visual function could be predicted more precisely.
    • References:
      Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1589-1599. (PMID: 28676279)
      PLoS One. 2014 Mar 03;9(3):e90554. (PMID: 24595065)
      Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;129(10):1299-304. (PMID: 21987672)
      J Glaucoma. 2018 Jun;27(6):481-489. (PMID: 29664832)
      Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 9;:null. (PMID: 28794076)
      Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:129-138. (PMID: 27173374)
      Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;57(4):347-58. (PMID: 23539100)
      Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;96(3):380-5. (PMID: 21733920)
      Opt Lett. 2010 May 1;35(9):1467-9. (PMID: 20436605)
      Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;58(2):188-96. (PMID: 24442888)
      Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jul 1;58(9):3350-3356. (PMID: 28687846)
      Exp Eye Res. 2015 Sep;138:6-21. (PMID: 26122048)
      Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3079141. (PMID: 29392131)
      JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 1;135(4):370-376. (PMID: 28301651)
      Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;20(2):92-8. (PMID: 19240541)
      JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;133(9):1036-44. (PMID: 26158562)
      Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:87-101. (PMID: 28088510)
      Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;101(6):780-785. (PMID: 27628426)
      Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;102(3):352-357. (PMID: 28739645)
      Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Mar 1;58(3):1637-1645. (PMID: 28297029)
      Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Feb 16;52(2):940-6. (PMID: 20881293)
      Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jun;43(6):778-784. (PMID: 29451992)
      Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT611-OCT620. (PMID: 27742922)
      Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;102(4):509-514. (PMID: 28814409)
      Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;56:13-7. (PMID: 27023108)
      J Glaucoma. 2012 Apr-May;21(4):266-73. (PMID: 21637116)
      Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2353-63. (PMID: 26465617)
      Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1546-50. (PMID: 23697959)
      Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov;120(11):1509-16. (PMID: 12427065)
      Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1782-9. (PMID: 21665283)
      Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013 Jan;32:1-21. (PMID: 22995953)
      J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1480746. (PMID: 28815087)
      Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jul 1;58(9):3785-3794. (PMID: 28744552)
      Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;175:30-36. (PMID: 27916714)
      Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1330-9. (PMID: 25939636)
      Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;29(2):102-8. (PMID: 25829826)
      PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184948. (PMID: 28934255)
      Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT211-23. (PMID: 27409475)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20181031 Date Completed: 20191025 Latest Revision: 20191030
    • الموضوع:
      20221213
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC6207782
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1038/s41598-018-34417-4
    • الرقم المعرف:
      30375515