Surveying knowledge, practice and attitudes towards intervention fidelity within trials of complex healthcare interventions.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101263253 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1745-6215 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17456215 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Trials Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-

Attitude of Health Personnel* ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice* ; Research Design*/standards; Clinical Trials as Topic/*methods ; Health Personnel/*psychology ; Research Personnel/*psychology; Adult ; Awareness ; Clinical Trials as Topic/standards ; Comprehension ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Personnel/standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Research Personnel/standards ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terminology as Topic

Background: Intervention fidelity is the degree to which interventions have been implemented as intended by their developers. Assessing fidelity is crucial for accurate interpretation of intervention effectiveness, but fidelity is often poorly addressed within trials of complex healthcare interventions. The reasons for this are unclear, and information on the use of methods to enhance and assess fidelity in trials of complex interventions remains insufficient. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, practice and attitudes towards intervention fidelity amongst researchers, triallists and healthcare professionals involved with the design and conduct of trials of complex healthcare interventions.
Methods: An online survey consisting of closed and open-ended questions exploring four sections (Demographics, Fidelity knowledge, Practice and Attitudes) was conducted. This was an opportunistic sample of individuals with experience of direct involvement in trials of complex healthcare interventions (e.g. design/development, conduct, evaluation).
Results: Data from 264 participants representing 15 countries were analysed. The majority (65.9%, n = 174) of participants identified themselves as 'Researchers'. The majority of participants were familiar with the term "intervention fidelity" (69.7%, n = 184) and indicated that fidelity is important (89.7%, n = 236). Mean self-reported understanding of fidelity was moderate. Although 68% (n = 182) had previously used strategies to assess (e.g. audio/video-recording sessions) and enhance (e.g. training manual) fidelity in trials of complex interventions, only a limited proportion of participants indicated always reporting these strategies in subsequent publications (30.9%, n = 56). Poor knowledge or understanding was the most commonly cited barrier to addressing intervention fidelity in trials (77.4%, n = 202). Over half of respondents (52.1%, n = 137) had never completed specific fidelity training or research, and the vast majority (89.7%, n = 236) would welcome specific training in this area.
Conclusion: Despite good awareness of intervention fidelity and its importance, poor knowledge and understanding appears to be a key factor limiting how intervention fidelity is addressed in trials of complex interventions. Participants identified a need for further training and education in this area. Additionally, clarification of the terminology, definition and components of intervention fidelity would facilitate better understanding of the concept. A discrepancy between participants' use of fidelity strategies and subsequent reporting raises concerns around inadequate fidelity reporting in the trials literature.

Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51. (PMID: 15367063)
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):872-903. (PMID: 28762607)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):212-8. (PMID: 19309181)
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):13-21. (PMID: 24795074)
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):673-82. (PMID: 20423402)
Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):237-56. (PMID: 12729182)
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 22;6:26. (PMID: 21426574)
Clin Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;18(1):23-45. (PMID: 9455622)
Am J Occup Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;61(2):216-27. (PMID: 17436844)
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Nov;60(3):343-52. (PMID: 17908130)
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. (PMID: 21513547)
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63. (PMID: 21499543)
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):153-61. (PMID: 26672924)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Dec;10(12):1677-90. (PMID: 19023822)
Psychooncology. 2011 Nov;20(11):1193-201. (PMID: 22012943)
Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1287-98. (PMID: 26939605)
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2011 Jul 29;8(4):379-96. (PMID: 21827305)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Aug;61(4):620-30. (PMID: 8370857)
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Apr;33(2):164-73. (PMID: 20198637)
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Nov;47(11):946-53. (PMID: 19643395)
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. (PMID: 16204405)
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687. (PMID: 24609605)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Apr;49(2):156-67. (PMID: 7217482)
Implement Sci. 2007 Nov 30;2:40. (PMID: 18053122)
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. (PMID: 18824488)
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):79-88. (PMID: 21130938)
Man Ther. 2015 Apr;20(2):287-94. (PMID: 25466294)
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 07;10:129. (PMID: 26345357)
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139. (PMID: 24289295)
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):765. (PMID: 28969669)
J Man Manip Ther. 2016 Sep;24(4):233-7. (PMID: 27582623)
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. (PMID: 25791983)
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. (PMID: 10474547)
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. (PMID: 18322790)
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):134-47. (PMID: 15855283)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):874-82. (PMID: 23810026)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Oct;73(5):852-60. (PMID: 16287385)

Keywords: Complex interventions; Intervention fidelity; Randomised control trials; Research methods; Survey

Date Created: 20180921 Date Completed: 20190107 Latest Revision: 20220409

20240829

PMC6147031

10.1186/s13063-018-2838-6

30231917