Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Unmet demand for short-acting hormonal and long-acting reversible contraception among community college students in Texas.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ على الانترنت اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Routledge Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8214119 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1940-3208 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07448481 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Am Coll Health Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Publication: 2010- : New York : Routledge
      Original Publication: [Washington, D.C. : Published by the Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation, in cooperation with the American College Health Association, c1982-
    • الموضوع:
      Contraception Behavior/*statistics & numerical data ; Contraceptive Agents/*therapeutic use ; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception/*statistics & numerical data ; Pregnancy, Unplanned/*psychology ; Sexual Behavior/*psychology ; Students/*psychology ; Universities/*statistics & numerical data; Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data ; Students/statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Texas ; Young Adult
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Objective: To identify preferences for and use of short-acting hormonal (e.g., oral contraceptives, injectable contraception) or long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among community college students in Texas.
      Participants: Female community college students, ages 18 to 24, at risk of pregnancy, sampled in Fall 2014 or Spring 2015 (N = 966).
      Methods: We assessed characteristics associated with preference for and use of short-acting hormonal or LARC methods (i.e., more-effective contraception).
      Results: 47% preferred short-acting hormonal methods and 21% preferred LARC, compared to 21% and 9%, respectively, who used these methods. A total of 63% of condom and withdrawal users and 78% of nonusers preferred a more effective method. Many noted cost and insurance barriers as reasons for not using their preferred more-effective method.
      Conclusions: Many young women in this sample who relied on less-effective methods preferred to use more-effective contraception. Reducing barriers could lead to higher uptake in this population at high risk of unintended pregnancy.
    • References:
      Womens Health Issues. 2012 Nov-Dec;22(6):e519-25. (PMID: 23122212)
      BMC Public Health. 2010 Apr 26;10:208. (PMID: 20420678)
      Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):851-8. (PMID: 25790404)
      Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1744-1752. (PMID: 27562799)
      Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):616-21. (PMID: 26212318)
      Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. (PMID: 20541171)
      Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):488-95. (PMID: 25129329)
      Health Educ Res. 2011 Aug;26(4):614-23. (PMID: 21447751)
      J Adolesc Health. 2016 Nov;59(5):577-583. (PMID: 27595471)
      Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007 Dec;39(4):226-30. (PMID: 18093039)
      Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):393-402. (PMID: 28697112)
      Womens Health Issues. 2012 Mar;22(2):e157-62. (PMID: 22265180)
      Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):653-8. (PMID: 22682722)
      Contraception. 2013 Oct;88(4):544-52. (PMID: 23664627)
      Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;127(2):289-96. (PMID: 26942356)
      J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4):438-42. (PMID: 27449328)
      Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):578-83. (PMID: 24656553)
      N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. (PMID: 26962904)
      Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Dec;43(4):230-7. (PMID: 22151510)
      J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(8):744-50. (PMID: 21950256)
      N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1998-2007. (PMID: 22621627)
      Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):562-8. (PMID: 26091743)
      Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jul;19(7):1507-14. (PMID: 25424456)
      Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;210(6):526.e1-9. (PMID: 24495671)
      NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Feb;(188):1-8. (PMID: 25714042)
      Eval Health Prof. 2014 Jun;37(2):178-202. (PMID: 24227658)
      J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007 Aug;20(4):233-40. (PMID: 17673135)
      J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S35-9. (PMID: 23535055)
      Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Jan 15;64(1):1-65. (PMID: 25603115)
      Contraception. 2016 Jul;94(1):68-73. (PMID: 26994674)
      J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):703-709. (PMID: 27665153)
      Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Jun;47(2):63-70. (PMID: 25639913)
      N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):853-60. (PMID: 26836435)
      J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004 Aug;17(4):279-87. (PMID: 15288030)
      Public Health Nurs. 1996 Apr;13(2):104-11. (PMID: 8936243)
      Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):125-32. (PMID: 24961366)
    • Grant Information:
      P2C HD042849 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; P2C HD066613 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; R24 HD042849 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Barriers to contraception; community college students; contraceptive preferences; contraceptive use
    • الرقم المعرف:
      0 (Contraceptive Agents)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20180207 Date Completed: 20190910 Latest Revision: 20231013
    • الموضوع:
      20231013
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC6692077
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1080/07448481.2018.1431901
    • الرقم المعرف:
      29405858