Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101263253 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1745-6215 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17456215 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Trials Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in routine delivery of clinical care can lead to improvements in quality of care, but often have design features that raise ethical concerns.
      Methods: We performed a discrete choice experiment and used conjoint analysis to assess how specific attributes of pragmatic dialysis trials influenced patients' and physicians' willingness to have their dialysis facility participate in a hypothetical trial of hypertension management. Electronic survey data were collected from 200 patients enrolled from 11 outpatient hemodialysis units and from 203 nephrologists. The three attributes studied were physicians' treatment autonomy, participants' research burden, and the approach to consent. The influence of each attribute was quantified using mixed-effects logistic regression.
      Results: Similar proportions of patients were willing to have their facilities participate in a trial with high vs. low physician autonomy (77% vs. 79%; p = 0.13) and research burden (76% vs. 80%; p = 0.06). Opt-in, opt-out, and notification-only consent approaches were acceptable to most patients (84%, 82%, and 81%, respectively), but compared to each of these consent approaches, fewer patients (66%) were willing to have their facility participate in a trial that used no notification (p < 0.001 for each 2-way comparison). Among the physicians, similar proportions were willing to participate in trials with high and low physician autonomy (61% and 61%, respectively, p = 0.96) or with low and high burden (60 and 61%, respectively, p = 0.79). However, as for the patients, the consent approach influenced trial acceptability with 77%, 69%, and 62% willing to participate using opt-in, opt-out, and notification-only, respectively, compared to no notification (36%) (p < 0.001 for each 2-way comparison).
      Conclusions: Curtailing physician's treatment autonomy and increasing the burden associated with participation did not influence patients' or physicians' willingness to participate in the hypothetical research, suggesting that pragmatic dialysis trials are generally acceptable to patients and physicians. Both patients and physicians preferred consent approaches that include at least some level of patient notification, but the majority of patients were still willing to participate in trials that did not notify patients of the research.
    • References:
      J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Oct;27(10):2955-2963. (PMID: 27401689)
      Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. (PMID: 21669364)
      N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):766-8. (PMID: 24552325)
      Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):645-6. (PMID: 10877330)
      BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1455. (PMID: 9572764)
      Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):141S-149S. (PMID: 3440387)
      N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):769-72. (PMID: 24552326)
      Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 17;135(2):112-23. (PMID: 11453711)
      Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):605-611. (PMID: 27365010)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):727-32. (PMID: 18369678)
      Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;41(4):37-46. (PMID: 21845922)
      JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715-22. (PMID: 10755498)
      Control Clin Trials. 1997 Aug;18(4):328-52. (PMID: 9257072)
      JAMA. 2014 Jun 18;311(23):2381-2. (PMID: 24810723)
      Med Care. 2008 Aug;46(8):878-81. (PMID: 18665068)
      Clin Trials. 2015 Jun;12(3):276-86. (PMID: 25733677)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):827-33. (PMID: 18299939)
      Hastings Cent Rep. 1983 Aug;13(4):40-7. (PMID: 6629749)
      Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):6S-30S. (PMID: 3326716)
      J Clin Oncol. 1994 Sep;12(9):1796-805. (PMID: 8083703)
      Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S2-3. (PMID: 23315889)
      Control Clin Trials. 2002 Jun;23(3):274-88. (PMID: 12057879)
      J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Mar;6(1):63-8. (PMID: 21460589)
      Control Clin Trials. 1994 Apr;15(2):154-9. (PMID: 8205805)
      J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 Jul 1;27(3):281-8. (PMID: 11464149)
      Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S4-S15. (PMID: 23315895)
      AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(2):106-115. (PMID: 27833931)
      JAMA. 1984 Nov 16;252(19):2739-45. (PMID: 6492351)
      JAMA. 2014 Apr 16;311(15):1497-8. (PMID: 24626256)
      Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S16-27. (PMID: 23315888)
      J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;52(12):1143-56. (PMID: 10580777)
      Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 25;162(21):2458-63. (PMID: 12437405)
      IRB. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):1-5. (PMID: 26964403)
      N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. (PMID: 27518663)
      J Asthma. 1999 May;36(3):213-6. (PMID: 10350218)
      Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):494-502. (PMID: 26374677)
      J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 15;21(22):4145-50. (PMID: 14559889)
    • Grant Information:
      T32 HL098054 United States HL NHLBI NIH HHS; UH3 DK102384 United States DK NIDDK NIH HHS
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Autonomy; Comparative effectiveness research; Ethics; Informed consent; Pragmatic clinical trial; Standard of care
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20171013 Date Completed: 20180717 Latest Revision: 20240327
    • الموضوع:
      20240327
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC5637128
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s13063-017-2217-8
    • الرقم المعرف:
      29020994