Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Processing Request
Eco-epidemiological analysis of rickettsial seropositivity in rural areas of Colombia: A multilevel approach.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Processing Request
- معلومة اضافية
- المصدر:
Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101291488 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1935-2735 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19352727 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Subsets: MEDLINE
- بيانات النشر:
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
- الموضوع:
- نبذة مختصرة :
Rickettsiosis is a re-emergent infectious disease without epidemiological surveillance in Colombia. This disease is generally undiagnosed and several deadly outbreaks have been reported in the country in the last decade. The aim of this study is to analyze the eco-epidemiological aspects of rickettsial seropositivity in rural areas of Colombia where outbreaks of the disease were previously reported. A cross-sectional study, which included 597 people living in 246 households from nine hamlets in two municipalities of Colombia, was conducted from November 2015 to January 2016. The survey was conducted to collect sociodemographic and household characteristics (exposure) data. Blood samples were collected to determine the rickettsial seropositivity in humans, horses and dogs (IFA, cut-off = 1/128). In addition, infections by rickettsiae were detected in ticks from humans and animals by real-time PCR targeting gltA and ompA genes. Data was analyzed by weighted multilevel clog-log regression model using three levels (person, household and hamlets) and rickettsial seropositivity in humans was the main outcome. Overall prevalence of rickettsial seropositivity in humans was 25.62% (95%CI 22.11-29.12). Age in years (PR = 1.01 95%CI 1.01-1.02) and male sex (PR = 1.65 95%CI 1.43-1.90) were risk markers for rickettsial seropositivity. Working outdoors (PR = 1.20 95%CI 1.02-1.41), deforestation and forest fragmentation for agriculture use (PR = 1.75 95%CI 1.51-2.02), opossum in peridomiciliary area (PR = 1.56 95%CI 1.37-1.79) and a high proportion of seropositive domestic animals in the home (PR20-40% vs <20% = 2.28 95%CI 1.59-3.23 and PR>40% vs <20% = 3.14 95%CI 2.43-4.04) were associated with rickettsial seropositivity in humans. This study showed the presence of Rickettsia antibodies in human populations and domestic animals. In addition, different species of rickettsiae were detected in ticks collected from humans and animals. Our results highlighted the role of domestic animals as sentinels of rickettsial infection to identify areas at risk of transmission, and the importance of preventive measures aimed at curtailing deforestation and the fragmentation of forests as a way of reducing the risk of transmission of emergent and re-emergent pathogens.
- References:
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017 Oct;8(6):887-894. (PMID: 28774495)
Biomedica. 2013 Sep;33 Suppl 1:99-107. (PMID: 24652254)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Feb;9(1):109-18. (PMID: 18945194)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Feb;11(2):265-70. (PMID: 15752445)
Braz J Biol. 2010 Nov;70(4):987-94. (PMID: 21180903)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Apr;84(4):608-13. (PMID: 21460018)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017 Jan;17 (1):23-32. (PMID: 28055574)
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9. (PMID: 22543367)
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011 Feb;106(1):117-8. (PMID: 21340366)
Trends Parasitol. 2014 Apr;30(4):205-14. (PMID: 24636356)
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0153303. (PMID: 27064788)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Jul;71(1):93-7. (PMID: 15238696)
Med Vet Entomol. 2011 Jun;25(2):148-55. (PMID: 20950356)
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 May 13;65(2):1-44. (PMID: 27172113)
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014 Mar;5(2):208-12. (PMID: 24378078)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan;94(1):35-42. (PMID: 26503270)
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014 Oct;5(6):672-5. (PMID: 25090976)
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 08;9(1):e84758. (PMID: 24416278)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016 May;16(5):302-8. (PMID: 27008102)
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Sep 13;9:499. (PMID: 27624315)
Biomedica. 2013 Sep;33 Suppl 1:38-51. (PMID: 24652248)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Mar 19;9(3):e0003499. (PMID: 25790245)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Oct;9(5):483-90. (PMID: 18973451)
J Med Entomol. 2012 Jul;49(4):960-5. (PMID: 22897060)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;16(3):521-3. (PMID: 20202436)
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998 Jul;48 Pt 3:839-49. (PMID: 9734038)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Aug;77(2):378-80. (PMID: 17690417)
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5. (PMID: 11524383)
J Parasitol. 2001 Feb;87(1):32-48. (PMID: 11227901)
Biom J. 2009 Jun;51(3):433-42. (PMID: 19588454)
Zoonoses Public Health. 2011 Sep;58(6):416-23. (PMID: 21824336)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;21(3):537-9. (PMID: 25695155)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016 Feb;16(2):85-7. (PMID: 26789730)
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005 Dec;100(8):841-5. (PMID: 16444414)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 May;17(5):829-34. (PMID: 21529391)
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Mar 02;9:125. (PMID: 26935205)
Acta Trop. 2017 Feb;166:225-233. (PMID: 27880877)
Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2010 Oct-Dec;19(4):205-9. (PMID: 21184695)
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772. (PMID: 22847109)
Zoonoses Public Health. 2015 Nov;62(7):525-33. (PMID: 25643912)
Vet Parasitol. 2003 May 1;113(3-4):273-88. (PMID: 12719142)
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017 Jun;8(4):477-482. (PMID: 28223058)
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Oct;1078:523-9. (PMID: 17114770)
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013 Jul 12;3:27. (PMID: 23875178)
- الرقم المعرف:
0 (Antibodies, Bacterial)
- الموضوع:
Date Created: 20170919 Date Completed: 20171023 Latest Revision: 20190202
- الموضوع:
20250114
- الرقم المعرف:
PMC5619838
- الرقم المعرف:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0005892
- الرقم المعرف:
28922404
No Comments.