Policing, massive street drug testing and poly-substance use chaos in Georgia - a policy case study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101258060 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1747-597X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1747597X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-

Health Policy/*trends ; Law Enforcement/*methods ; Police/*statistics & numerical data ; Substance Abuse Detection/*legislation & jurisprudence ; Substance-Related Disorders/*diagnosis ; Substance-Related Disorders/*prevention & control; Georgia (Republic) ; Harm Reduction ; Humans ; Illicit Drugs/adverse effects ; Illicit Drugs/legislation & jurisprudence ; Prevalence ; Substance Abuse Detection/methods ; Substance Abuse, Intravenous/diagnosis ; Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology ; Substance Abuse, Intravenous/prevention & control ; Substance Abuse, Intravenous/psychology ; Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology ; Substance-Related Disorders/psychology

Background: Since early 2000, intensive policing, wide scale street drug testing, and actions aimed at limiting the availability of specific drugs have been implemented in Georgia. Supporters of this approach argue that fear of drug testing and resulting punishment compels drug users to stop using and prevents youth from initiating drug use. It has been also stated that reduction in the availability of specific drugs should be seen as an indication of the overall success of counter-drug efforts. The aim of the current review is to describe the drug-related law enforcement response in Georgia and its impact on illicit drug consumption and drug-related harm.
Method: We reviewed relevant literature that included peer-reviewed scientific articles, stand-alone research reports, annual drug situation reports, technical reports and program data. This was also supplemented by the review of relevant legislation and judicial practices for the twelve year period between 2002 and 2014.
Results: Every episode of reduced availability of any "traditional" injection drug was followed by the discovery/introduction of a new injection preparation. The pattern of drug consumption was normally driven by users' attempts to substitute their drug of choice through mixing together available alternative substances. Chaotic poly-substance use and extensive utilization of home-made injection drugs, prepared from toxic precursors, became common. Massive random street drug testing had little or no effect on the prevalence of problem drug use.
Conclusions: Intensive harassment of drug users and exclusive focus on reducing the availability of specific drugs did not result in reduction of the prevalence of injecting drug use. Repressive response of Georgian anti-drug authorities relied heavily on consumer sanctions, which led to shifts in drug users' behavior. In most cases, these shifts were associated with the introduction and use of new toxic preparations and subsequent harm to the physical and mental health of drug consumers.

BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 30;3(9):e003077. (PMID: 24080093)
J Anal Toxicol. 1999 Mar-Apr;23(2):119-24. (PMID: 10192416)
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Jun 5;70(3):275-86. (PMID: 12757965)
J Anal Toxicol. 2002 Oct;26(7):493-9. (PMID: 12423006)
Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 Jun;115(6):385-9. (PMID: 17511846)
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Apr;249:207-13. (PMID: 25710781)
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26 Suppl 1:S1-4. (PMID: 25727257)
Eur Addict Res. 2010;16(1):1-8. (PMID: 19887803)
Clin Biochem. 2009 Oct;42(15):1531-42. (PMID: 19643101)
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 May 02;1:11. (PMID: 16722543)
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Jul;24(4):265-74. (PMID: 23726898)
BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):428-9. (PMID: 15292056)
Addiction. 2005 Apr;100(4):479-88. (PMID: 15784062)
J Urban Health. 2011 Aug;88(4):736-48. (PMID: 21717253)

0 (Illicit Drugs)

Date Created: 20160117 Date Completed: 20161013 Latest Revision: 20240523

20240523

PMC4715284

10.1186/s13011-016-0049-2

26772817