Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Receptor Polymorphism and Genomic Structure Interact to Shape Bitter Taste Perception.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101239074 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1553-7404 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15537390 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Genet Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science, c2005-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      The ability to taste bitterness evolved to safeguard most animals, including humans, against potentially toxic substances, thereby leading to food rejection. Nonetheless, bitter perception is subject to individual variations due to the presence of genetic functional polymorphisms in bitter taste receptor (TAS2R) genes, such as the long-known association between genetic polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and bitter taste perception of phenylthiocarbamide. Yet, due to overlaps in specificities across receptors, such associations with a single TAS2R locus are uncommon. Therefore, to investigate more complex associations, we examined taste responses to six structurally diverse compounds (absinthin, amarogentin, cascarillin, grosheimin, quassin, and quinine) in a sample of the Caucasian population. By sequencing all bitter receptor loci, inferring long-range haplotypes, mapping their effects on phenotype variation, and characterizing functionally causal allelic variants, we deciphered at the molecular level how a subjects' genotype for the whole-family of TAS2R genes shapes variation in bitter taste perception. Within each haplotype block implicated in phenotypic variation, we provided evidence for at least one locus harboring functional polymorphic alleles, e.g. one locus for sensitivity to amarogentin, one of the most bitter natural compounds known, and two loci for sensitivity to grosheimin, one of the bitter compounds of artichoke. Our analyses revealed also, besides simple associations, complex associations of bitterness sensitivity across TAS2R loci. Indeed, even if several putative loci harbored both high- and low-sensitivity alleles, phenotypic variation depended on linkage between these alleles. When sensitive alleles for bitter compounds were maintained in the same linkage phase, genetically driven perceptual differences were obvious, e.g. for grosheimin. On the contrary, when sensitive alleles were in opposite phase, only weak genotype-phenotype associations were seen, e.g. for absinthin, the bitter principle of the beverage absinth. These findings illustrate the extent to which genetic influences on taste are complex, yet arise from both receptor activation patterns and linkage structure among receptor genes.
    • References:
      Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Mar;24(2):173-98. (PMID: 10714382)
      Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):693-702. (PMID: 10761934)
      Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):703-11. (PMID: 10761935)
      Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):601-4. (PMID: 10766242)
      Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;72(6):1424-35. (PMID: 11101467)
      Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;68(4):978-89. (PMID: 11254454)
      Science. 2001 Jul 20;293(5529):489-93. (PMID: 11452081)
      Nat Genet. 2002 Nov;32(3):397-401. (PMID: 12379855)
      Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1227-34. (PMID: 12384857)
      Science. 2003 Feb 21;299(5610):1221-5. (PMID: 12595690)
      Mol Biol Evol. 2003 May;20(5):805-14. (PMID: 12679530)
      Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Aug;4(8):587-97. (PMID: 12897771)
      J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 13;23(19):7376-80. (PMID: 12917372)
      Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Nov;73(5):1162-9. (PMID: 14574645)
      Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Apr;74(4):765-9. (PMID: 14997420)
      Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Apr;74(4):637-46. (PMID: 14997422)
      Physiol Behav. 2004 Aug;82(1):109-14. (PMID: 15234598)
      Bioinformatics. 2005 Jan 15;21(2):263-5. (PMID: 15297300)
      Curr Biol. 2005 Feb 22;15(4):322-7. (PMID: 15723792)
      Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):1257-65. (PMID: 16051168)
      Hum Mutat. 2005 Sep;26(3):199-204. (PMID: 16086309)
      Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):717-25. (PMID: 16125588)
      Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1299-320. (PMID: 16255080)
      Genetics. 2006 Apr;172(4):2015-23. (PMID: 16636110)
      Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):633-42. (PMID: 17248813)
      Genetics. 2007 May;176(1):351-9. (PMID: 17339205)
      J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Jul 25;55(15):6236-43. (PMID: 17595105)
      Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):1403-8. (PMID: 17702579)
      PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep 4;5(10):e254. (PMID: 17803354)
      Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):851-61. (PMID: 17943122)
      J Hered. 2008 Jul-Aug;99(4):438-40. (PMID: 18310616)
      Annu Rev Nutr. 2008;28:367-88. (PMID: 18407743)
      J Neurochem. 2008 Aug;106(3):1138-48. (PMID: 18466324)
      Genetics. 2008 Sep;180(1):533-45. (PMID: 18757931)
      PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3974. (PMID: 19092995)
      Br J Nutr. 2009 Nov;102(9):1375-85. (PMID: 19505346)
      Curr Biol. 2009 Aug 11;19(15):1288-93. (PMID: 19559618)
      Chem Senses. 2010 Feb;35(2):157-70. (PMID: 20022913)
      Chemosens Percept. 2010 Mar;3(1):51-56. (PMID: 20352054)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 15;107(24):11110-5. (PMID: 20534469)
      Chem Senses. 2010 Oct;35(8):685-92. (PMID: 20551074)
      Chem Senses. 2010 Sep;35(7):579-92. (PMID: 20660057)
      Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Nov 1;19(21):4278-85. (PMID: 20675712)
      Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):311-9. (PMID: 21163912)
      Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Sep 1;20(17):3437-49. (PMID: 21672920)
      BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 18;13:134. (PMID: 22708584)
      Chem Senses. 2012 Oct;37(8):737-44. (PMID: 22824251)
      Nature. 2012 Nov 1;491(7422):56-65. (PMID: 23128226)
      PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e45232. (PMID: 23133589)
      J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 2;33(1):201-13. (PMID: 23283334)
      Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013 May 31;435(2):267-73. (PMID: 23632330)
      Curr Biol. 2013 May 6;23(9):R401-8. (PMID: 23660363)
      Food Qual Prefer. 2013 Dec;30(2):202-216. (PMID: 23878414)
      Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Jan 1;23(1):259-67. (PMID: 23966204)
      Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct;98(4):1136-43. (PMID: 24025627)
      Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Feb;31(2):288-302. (PMID: 24177185)
      Genes Nutr. 2014 May;9(3):401. (PMID: 24705770)
      Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Oct;38(10):2550-60. (PMID: 25257701)
      Nutr Rev. 2015 Feb;73(2):83-91. (PMID: 26024495)
      Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1977;290:18-34. (PMID: 276291)
      Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1435-1444. (PMID: 28568624)
      J Mol Evol. 1987;25(4):351-60. (PMID: 3118049)
      Child Dev. 1988 Dec;59(6):1555-68. (PMID: 3208567)
      Science. 1971 Feb 26;171(3973):757-70. (PMID: 5541160)
      Physiol Behav. 1994 Dec;56(6):1209-16. (PMID: 7878093)
      Physiol Behav. 1994 Dec;56(6):1217-27. (PMID: 7878094)
      Chem Senses. 1996 Jun;21(3):323-34. (PMID: 8670711)
      Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Oct;23(10):403-5. (PMID: 9810230)
    • الرقم المعرف:
      0 (Iridoids)
      0 (Quassins)
      0 (Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled)
      0 (Sesquiterpenes)
      0 (Sesquiterpenes, Guaiane)
      0 (TAS2R1 protein, human)
      0 (absinthin)
      5L82GT5I0W (amarogentin)
      6F82C6Q54C (Phenylthiourea)
      A7V27PHC7A (Quinine)
      ML3SLU81RH (grosheimin)
      QP1YAK6QGK (quassin)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20150926 Date Completed: 20160429 Latest Revision: 20221207
    • الموضوع:
      20231215
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC4583475
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pgen.1005530
    • الرقم المعرف:
      26406243