Using Web-Based Questionnaires and Obstetric Records to Assess General Health Characteristics Among Pregnant Women: A Validation Study.

Publisher: JMIR Publications Country of Publication: Canada NLM ID: 100959882 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1438-8871 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14388871 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Med Internet Res Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: <2011- > : Toronto : JMIR Publications
Original Publication: [Pittsburgh, PA? : s.n., 1999-

Chronic Disease* ; Internet* ; Surveys and Questionnaires*; Data Collection/*standards ; Medical Records/*standards ; Self Report/*standards; Adult ; Asthma ; Blood Pressure ; Female ; General Practice ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Migraine Disorders ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Young Adult

Background: Self-reported medical history information is included in many studies. However, data on the validity of Web-based questionnaires assessing medical history are scarce. If proven to be valid, Web-based questionnaires may provide researchers with an efficient means to collect data on this parameter in large populations.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of a Web-based questionnaire on chronic medical conditions, allergies, and blood pressure readings against obstetric records and data from general practitioners.
Methods: Self-reported questionnaire data were compared with obstetric records for 519 pregnant women participating in the Dutch PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study from July 2011 through November 2012. These women completed Web-based questionnaires around their first prenatal care visit and in gestational weeks 17 and 34. We calculated kappa statistics (κ) and the observed proportions of positive and negative agreement between the baseline questionnaire and obstetric records for chronic conditions and allergies. In case of inconsistencies between these 2 data sources, medical records from the woman's general practitioner were consulted as the reference standard. For systolic and diastolic blood pressure, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for multiple data points.
Results: Agreement between the baseline questionnaire and the obstetric record was substantial (κ=.61) for any chronic condition and moderate for any allergy (κ=.51). For specific conditions, we found high observed proportions of negative agreement (range 0.88-1.00) and on average moderate observed proportions of positive agreement with a wide range (range 0.19-0.90). Using the reference standard, the sensitivity of the Web-based questionnaire for chronic conditions and allergies was comparable to or even better than the sensitivity of the obstetric records, in particular for migraine (0.90 vs 0.40, P=.02), asthma (0.86 vs 0.61, P=.04), inhalation allergies (0.92 vs 0.74, P=.003), hay fever (0.90 vs 0.64, P=.001), and allergies to animals (0.89 vs 0.53, P=.01). However, some overreporting of allergies was observed in the questionnaire and for some nonsomatic conditions sensitivity of both measurement instruments was low. The ICCs for blood pressure readings ranged between 0.72 and 0.92 with very small mean differences between the 2 methods of data collection.
Conclusions: Web-based questionnaires can be used to validly collect data on many chronic disorders, allergies, and blood pressure readings among pregnant women.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):181-91. (PMID: 8437034)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(5):411-6. (PMID: 15233312)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1096-103. (PMID: 15528061)
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Feb;80(2):203-10. (PMID: 15704775)
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;34(3):688-95. (PMID: 15737964)
BMC Public Health. 2005;5:94. (PMID: 16156889)
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Mar;63(3):173-9. (PMID: 16497858)
Addiction. 2006 Sep;101(9):1352-61. (PMID: 16911736)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S49-57. (PMID: 17491171)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:37. (PMID: 18644098)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):306-13. (PMID: 18774692)
Headache. 2009 Feb;49(2):202-11. (PMID: 19222594)
J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e35. (PMID: 19674962)
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):761-5. (PMID: 19416928)
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(2):89-94. (PMID: 19609073)
J Headache Pain. 2010 Feb;11(1):67-73. (PMID: 19946790)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):558-65. (PMID: 19959329)
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):547-54. (PMID: 20538198)
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 May;62(5):289-93. (PMID: 20536476)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):932-7. (PMID: 20189760)
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 1;173(5):544-52. (PMID: 21273397)
Gac Sanit. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):211-9. (PMID: 21466908)
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 Feb;66(2):166-73. (PMID: 21934698)
Epidemiology. 2012 Mar;23(2):203-11. (PMID: 22249241)
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Mar;25 Suppl 1:S12-7. (PMID: 22403245)
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;27(1):34-43. (PMID: 23215710)
Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;36(1):43-54. (PMID: 23315295)
BMC Public Health. 2013;13:16. (PMID: 23302258)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S3. (PMID: 23445768)
J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e52. (PMID: 23570956)
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 1;153(3):299-306. (PMID: 11157418)
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8. (PMID: 2189948)
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004 Sep;70(9):592-6. (PMID: 15368558)
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. (PMID: 2868172)
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 May;123(5):894-900. (PMID: 3962971)
Headache. 1991 May;31(5):290-5. (PMID: 1860786)
Prev Med. 2013 Jul;57(1):38-42. (PMID: 23597657)
J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e109. (PMID: 23739995)
J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e152. (PMID: 23928492)
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):490-7. (PMID: 24496536)
J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(12):1207-13. (PMID: 2585011)
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9. (PMID: 2348207)
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Mar 15;147(6):556-62. (PMID: 9521182)

Keywords: Internet; PRIDE Study; allergens; blood pressure; chronic disease; medical records; pregnancy; questionnaires; validation studies

Date Created: 20150618 Date Completed: 20160128 Latest Revision: 20191210

20240628

PMC4526940

10.2196/jmir.3847

26081990