Do existing mechanisms contribute to improvements in care coordination across levels of care in health services networks? Opinions of the health personnel in Colombia and Brazil.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

Attitude of Health Personnel* ; Efficiency, Organizational* ; Interprofessional Relations*; Community Health Services/*organization & administration ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/*organization & administration ; Health Personnel/*psychology ; Quality Improvement/*organization & administration; Adult ; Brazil ; Colombia ; Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data

Background: The fragmentation of healthcare provision has given rise to a wide range of interventions within organizations to improve coordination across levels of care, primarily in high income countries but also in some middle and low-income countries. The aim is to analyze the use of coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks and its implications for the delivery of health care. This is studied from the perspective of health personnel in two countries with different health systems, Colombia and Brazil.
Methods: A qualitative, exploratory and descriptive-interpretative study was conducted, based on a case study of healthcare networks in two municipalities in each country. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with a three stage theoretical sample of a) health (112) and administrative (66) professionals of different care levels, and b) managers of providers (42) and insurers (14). A thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by cases, informant groups and themes.
Results: The results show that care coordination mechanisms are poorly implemented in general. However, the results are marginally better in certain segments of the Colombian networks analyzed (ambulatory centres with primary and secondary care co-location owned by or tied to the contributory scheme insurers, and public providers of the subsidized scheme); and in the network of the state capital in Brazil. Professionals point to numerous problems in the use of existing mechanisms, such as the insufficient recording of information in referral forms, low frequency and level of participation in shared clinical sessions, low adherence to the few available clinical guidelines and the lack of or inadequate referral of patients by the patient referral centres, particularly in the Brazilian networks. The absence or limited use of care coordination mechanisms leads, according to informants, to the inadequate follow-up of patients, interruptions in care and duplication of tests. Professionals use informal strategies to try to overcome these limitations.
Conclusions: The results indicate not only the limited implementation of mechanisms for coordination across care levels, but also a limited use of existing mechanisms in the healthcare networks analyzed. This has a negative impact on coordination, efficiency and quality of care. Organizational changes are required in the networks and healthcare systems to address these problems.

N C Med J. 2012 Jan-Feb;73(1):61-2. (PMID: 22619859)
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Jan 31;13:10. (PMID: 24479581)
Health Policy Plan. 1998 Dec;13(4):433-45. (PMID: 10346035)
JAMA. 2001 Nov 28;286(20):2578-85. (PMID: 11722272)
Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):210-9. (PMID: 16361395)
Qual Manag Health Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;20(3):223-33. (PMID: 21725220)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:323. (PMID: 23958136)
Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 19;6:6. (PMID: 21244714)
Healthc Policy. 2006 Mar;1(3):99-120. (PMID: 19305674)
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 28;9:46. (PMID: 21524315)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 28;14:95. (PMID: 24575955)
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Mar;17(3):653-60. (PMID: 22450406)
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):217-9. (PMID: 14694699)
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009 Oct;26(4):360-7. (PMID: 20107686)
Med Care. 2009 Sep;47(9):993-9. (PMID: 19648836)
Gac Sanit. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):480-8. (PMID: 25048392)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004910. (PMID: 17636778)
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2003;33(1):17-37. (PMID: 12906341)
BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1531-4. (PMID: 8978232)
Gac Sanit. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):280-6. (PMID: 19250716)
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Feb-Mar;21(2-3):96-110. (PMID: 17565797)
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106:204-13. (PMID: 24576647)
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2005 Nov-Dec;79(6):633-43. (PMID: 16457055)
Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):39-68. (PMID: 21418312)
Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27;6:84. (PMID: 21794109)
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Jul;30(6):705-17. (PMID: 24963157)
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Sep;15(9):626-31. (PMID: 11029676)
Cad Saude Publica. 2010 Feb;26(2):286-98. (PMID: 20396844)
Hosp Health Netw. 1996 Mar 20;70(6):43-4, 46, 48. (PMID: 8593505)
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2009 Sep;81(3):551-8. (PMID: 19722023)
Gac Sanit. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):485-95. (PMID: 17198628)
Cien Saude Colet. 2009 Jan-Feb;14(1):129-38. (PMID: 19142316)
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):12-23.e1. (PMID: 22542309)
Med J Aust. 2008 Apr 21;188(S8):S65-8. (PMID: 18429740)
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Oct-Dec;19 Suppl 1:S25-43. (PMID: 15686059)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD005471. (PMID: 18843691)
Manag Care Q. 1996 Spring;4(2):12-25. (PMID: 10157259)
Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1778-97. (PMID: 21561655)

Date Created: 20150530 Date Completed: 20160516 Latest Revision: 20240323

20240323

PMC4447020

10.1186/s12913-015-0882-4

26022531