Does regular standing improve bowel function in people with spinal cord injury? A randomised crossover trial.

Publisher: Stockton Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9609749 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1476-5624 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13624393 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Spinal Cord Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK : Stockton Press, c1996-

Posture/*physiology ; Spinal Cord Injuries/*complications ; Urinary Bladder Diseases/*etiology ; Urinary Bladder Diseases/*rehabilitation; Adult ; Australia ; Cross-Over Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Patient Compliance ; Residence Characteristics ; Single-Blind Method ; Time Factors ; United Kingdom

Study Design: A randomised crossover trial.
Objectives: To determine the effects of a 6-week standing programme on bowel function in people with spinal cord injury.
Setting: Community, Australia and the United Kingdom.
Methods: Twenty community-dwelling people with motor complete spinal cord injury above T8 participated in a 16-week trial. The trial consisted of a 6-week stand phase and a 6-week no-stand phase separated by a 4-week washout period. Participants were randomised to one of two treatment sequences. Participants allocated to the Treatment First group stood on a tilt table for 30 min per session, five times per week for 6 weeks and then did not stand for the next 10 weeks. Participants allocated to the Control First group did the opposite: they did not stand for 10 weeks and then stood for 6 weeks. Participants in both groups received routine bowel care throughout the 16-week trial. Assessments occurred at weeks 0, 7, 10 and 17 corresponding with pre and post stand and no-stand phases. The primary outcome was Time to First Stool. There were seven secondary outcomes reflecting other aspects of bowel function and spasticity.
Results: There were three dropouts leaving complete data sets on 17 participants. The mean (95% confidence interval) between-intervention difference for Time to First Stool was 0 min (-7 to 7) indicating no effect of regular standing on Time to First Stool.
Conclusion: Regular standing does not reduce Time to First Stool. Further trials are required to test the veracity of some commonly held assumptions about the benefits of regular standing for bowel function.

J Spinal Cord Med. 1999 Fall;22(3):152-8. (PMID: 10685379)
Spinal Cord. 2009 Aug;47(8):623-7. (PMID: 19274057)
Spinal Cord. 2000 Dec;38(12):717-23. (PMID: 11175370)
Gut. 1999 Jan;44(1):77-80. (PMID: 9862829)
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Feb 4;27(3):142-6. (PMID: 15823996)
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jun;24(6):483-8. (PMID: 20511302)
Spinal Cord. 2010 Jun;48(6):504-10. (PMID: 19949417)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;88(9):1185-92. (PMID: 17826466)
Spinal Cord. 2013 Sep;51(9):683-7. (PMID: 23774126)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Feb;80(2):214-20. (PMID: 10025500)
Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Dec;33(12 ):1592-5. (PMID: 3271002)
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Jun;39(6):681-5. (PMID: 8646957)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):73-8. (PMID: 8420525)
Spinal Cord. 2006 Oct;44(10):625-31. (PMID: 16344850)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD002115. (PMID: 16625555)
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;41(1):95-100. (PMID: 15273902)
SCI Nurs. 2001 Summer;18(2):74-7. (PMID: 12035465)
Phys Ther. 2001 Aug;81(8):1392-9. (PMID: 11509069)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Oct;74(10):1121-2. (PMID: 8215868)
Spinal Cord. 2012 Aug;50(8):595-8. (PMID: 22584281)
Spinal Cord. 2010 Oct;48(10):718-33. (PMID: 20212501)
Assist Technol. 1998;10(2):84-93. (PMID: 10339284)

Date Created: 20141105 Date Completed: 20150831 Latest Revision: 20191210

20240829

10.1038/sc.2014.189

25366527