Developing and validating a tablet version of an illness explanatory model interview for a public health survey in Pune, India.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Research Design* ; Surveys and Questionnaires*; Health Care Surveys/*instrumentation ; Health Care Surveys/*methods ; Public Health/*methods; Computers, Handheld ; Humans ; India ; Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use ; Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data

Background: Mobile electronic devices are replacing paper-based instruments and questionnaires for epidemiological and public health research. The elimination of a data-entry step after an interview is a notable advantage over paper, saving investigator time, decreasing the time lags in managing and analyzing data, and potentially improving the data quality by removing the error-prone data-entry step. Research has not yet provided adequate evidence, however, to substantiate the claim of fewer errors for computerized interviews.
Methodology: We developed an Android-based illness explanatory interview for influenza vaccine acceptance and tested the instrument in a field study in Pune, India, for feasibility and acceptability. Error rates for tablet and paper were compared with reference to the voice recording of the interview as gold standard to assess discrepancies. We also examined the preference of interviewers for the classical paper-based or the electronic version of the interview and compared the costs of research with both data collection devices.
Results: In 95 interviews with household respondents, total error rates with paper and tablet devices were nearly the same (2.01% and 1.99% respectively). Most interviewers indicated no preference for a particular device; but those with a preference opted for tablets. The initial investment in tablet-based interviews was higher compared to paper, while the recurring costs per interview were lower with the use of tablets.
Conclusion: An Android-based tablet version of a complex interview was developed and successfully validated. Advantages were not compromised by increased errors, and field research assistants with a preference preferred the Android device. Use of tablets may be more costly than paper for small samples and less costly for large studies.

J Med Internet Res. 2012 Sep 18;14(5):e119. (PMID: 22989894)
Glob Public Health. 2011;6(1):56-71. (PMID: 21509994)
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2007 Jun 01;4:5. (PMID: 17543099)
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 13;3(2):. (PMID: 23408082)
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e74570. (PMID: 24066147)
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Mar;127(3):684-90. (PMID: 3257643)
Hum Vaccin. 2011 Dec;7(12):1299-308. (PMID: 22108036)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 23;9:51. (PMID: 20030813)
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Mar;141(3):639-50. (PMID: 22564277)
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Jul;11(7):1022-31. (PMID: 16827703)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):8-17. (PMID: 17161749)
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Aug;78(8):532-42. (PMID: 19369114)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jun 26;13(1):68. (PMID: 23802988)
PLoS One. 2010 May 07;5(5):e10540. (PMID: 20479875)
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;32(2):189-97. (PMID: 24212101)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 May 31;6:23. (PMID: 16737535)

0 (Influenza Vaccines)

Date Created: 20140919 Date Completed: 20150615 Latest Revision: 20211021

20240628

PMC4169412

10.1371/journal.pone.0107374

25233212