The consumer quality index anthroposophic healthcare: a construction and validation study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

Patient Satisfaction* ; Quality of Health Care* ; Surveys and Questionnaires*; Family Practice/*standards; Adult ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Psychometrics

Background: Accounting for the patients' perspective on quality of care has become increasingly important in the development of Evidence Based Medicine as well as in governmental policies. In the Netherlands the Consumer Quality (CQ) Index has been developed to measure the quality of care from the patients' perspective in different healthcare sectors in a standardized manner. Although the scientific accountability of anthroposophic healthcare as a form of integrative medicine is growing, patient experiences with anthroposophic healthcare have not been measured systematically. In addition, the specific anthroposophic aspects are not measured by means of existing CQ Indexes. To enable accountability of quality of the anthroposophic healthcare from the patients' perspective the aim of this study is the construction and validation of a CQ Index for anthroposophic healthcare.
Method: Construction in three phases: Phase 1. Determining anthroposophic quality aspects: literature study and focus groups. Phase 2. Adding new questions and validating the new questionnaire. Research population: random sample from 7910 patients of 22 anthroposophic GPs.
Data Collection: survey, mixed mode by means of the Dillman method. Measuring instrument: experience questionnaire: CQ Index General Practice (56 items), added with 27 new anthroposophic items added and an item-importance questionnaire (anthroposophic items only).
Statistical Analyses: Factor analysis, scale construction, internal consistency (Chronbach's Alpha), inter-item-correlation, discriminative ability (Intra Class Correlation) and inter-factor-correlations. Phase 3. Modulation and selection of new questions based on results. Criteria of retaining items: general: a limited amount of items, statistical: part of a reliable scale and inter-item-correlation <0,7, and theoretical.
Results: Phase 1. 27 anthroposophic items. Phase 2. Two new anthroposophic scales: Scale AntroposophicTreatmentGP: seven items, Alpha=0,832, ICC=4,2 Inter-factor-correlation with existing GP-scales range from r=0,24 (Accessibility) to r=0,56 (TailoredCare). Scale InteractionalStyleGP: five items, Alpha=0,810, ICC=5,8, Inter-factor-correlation with existing GP-scales range from r=0,32 (Accessibility) to r=0,76 (TailoredCare). Inter-factor-correlation between new scales: r=0,50. Phase 3: Adding both scales and four single items. Removing eleven items and reformulating two items.
Conclusion: The CQ Index Anthroposophic Healthcare measures patient experiences with anthroposophic GP's validly and reliably. Regarding the inter-factor-correlations anthroposophic quality aspects from the patients' perspective are mostly associated with individually tailored care and patient centeredness.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 17;12:261. (PMID: 22900589)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 06;11:332. (PMID: 22145965)
Health Expect. 1998 Nov;1(2):82-95. (PMID: 11281863)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 06;10:88. (PMID: 20370925)
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):769-76. (PMID: 21695547)
Forsch Komplementmed. 2011;18(5):269-82. (PMID: 22105040)
JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1608-12. (PMID: 9370508)
Health Expect. 2010 Sep;13(3):285-97. (PMID: 20550597)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 25;12:76. (PMID: 22443174)

Date Created: 20140404 Date Completed: 20150114 Latest Revision: 20211021

20240628

PMC4230405

10.1186/1472-6963-14-148

24694288