Multiple perspectives on symptom interpretation in primary care research.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100967792 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2296 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712296 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Fam Pract Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2000-2021]

Anthropology* ; Attitude of Health Personnel* ; Attitude to Health* ; Disease* ; Medicine* ; Primary Health Care* ; Psychology*; Biomedical Research ; Humans

Background: Assessment and management of symptoms is a main task in primary care. Symptoms may be defined as 'any subjective evidence of a health problem as perceived by the patient'. In other words, symptoms do not appear as such; symptoms are rather the result of an interpretation process. We aim to discuss different perspectives on symptom interpretation as presented in the disciplines of biomedicine, psychology and anthropology and the possible implications for our understanding of research on symptoms in relation to prevalence and diagnosis in the general population and in primary care.
Discussion: Symptom experiences are embedded in a complex interplay between biological, psychological and cultural factors. From a biomedical perspective, symptoms are seen as possible indicators of disease and are characterized by parameters related to seriousness (e.g. appearance, severity, impact and temporal aspects). However, such symptom characteristics are rarely unambiguous, but merely indicate disease probability. In addition, the GP's interpretation of presenting symptoms will also be influenced by other factors. From a psychological perspective, factors affecting interpretation are in focus (e.g. internal frame of reference, attention to sensations, illness perception and susceptibility to suggestion). These individual factors cannot stand alone either, but are influenced by the surroundings. Anthropological research suggests that personal experiences and culture form a continuous feedback relationship which influence when and how sensations are understood as symptoms of disease and acted upon.
Summary: The different approaches to symptom interpretation imply that we need to be cautious and conscious when interpreting survey findings that are based on symptom prevalence in the general population or in primary care. These findings will reflect a variety of interpretations of sensations, which are not equivalent to expressions of underlying disease. Furthermore, if diagnosis of disease is based exclusively on the presence of specific symptom characteristics, we may risk reinforcing a dualistic approach, including medicalisation of normal phenomena and devaluation of medically unexplained symptoms. Future research in primary care could gain from exploring symptoms as a generic phenomenon and raised awareness of symptom complexity.

Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;9(1):55-9. (PMID: 19532093)
J Psychosom Res. 1992 Jul;36(5):439-47. (PMID: 1535658)
Med Care. 1987 Jun;25(6):539-69. (PMID: 3695661)
J Psychosom Res. 1997 Mar;42(3):245-52. (PMID: 9130181)
Environ Health. 2011 Sep 14;10:78. (PMID: 21914211)
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;184:470-6. (PMID: 15172939)
Psychol Med. 2005 Aug;35(8):1175-84. (PMID: 16116943)
BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):350-2. (PMID: 9270458)
Psychosom Med. 2007 Jan;69(1):30-9. (PMID: 17244846)
CNS Spectr. 2006 Mar;11(3):190-200. (PMID: 16575376)
Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):844-53. (PMID: 11346320)
Am J Med. 1989 Mar;86(3):262-6. (PMID: 2919607)
Soc Sci Med. 2000 May;50(10):1385-401. (PMID: 10741575)
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct;106(10):1749-59; quiz 1760. (PMID: 21747417)
Psychosom Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;68(4):570-7. (PMID: 16868266)
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Sep;28(3):132-7. (PMID: 20698729)
Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;17(6):462-71. (PMID: 11120716)
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Nov 8;153(21):2474-80. (PMID: 8215752)
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Sep;24(5):557-81. (PMID: 15325745)
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010 Aug;83(6):595-605. (PMID: 20130906)
J Psychosom Res. 1997 Feb;42(2):113-6. (PMID: 9076639)
Biopsychosoc Med. 2007 Oct 09;1:17. (PMID: 17925010)
Soc Sci Med (1967). 1973 Sep;7(9):677-89. (PMID: 4749058)
Psychosom Med. 2008 May;70(4):430-4. (PMID: 18434494)
Clin Med (Lond). 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):536-9. (PMID: 17228551)
Lancet. 1999 Sep 11;354(9182):936-9. (PMID: 10489969)
Respiration. 2011;81(2):161-74. (PMID: 21079381)
Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):267. (PMID: 8536827)
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;104(6):934-40. (PMID: 21364593)
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Apr;60(4):357-63. (PMID: 16581359)
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Dec;53(497):917-22. (PMID: 14960214)
BMJ. 2009 Aug 13;339:b3094. (PMID: 19679615)
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jan;61(582):e1-11. (PMID: 21401979)
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Sep;60(578):e366-77. (PMID: 20849687)
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Apr 07;12:16. (PMID: 21473756)
J Psychosom Res. 2010 May;68(5):415-26. (PMID: 20403500)
Psychosom Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;64(2):353-7. (PMID: 11914453)
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(3):R61. (PMID: 19413909)
Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 May;9(5):745-58. (PMID: 19402782)
BMJ. 2007 May 19;334(7602):1040. (PMID: 17493982)
Psychosom Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;50(5):510-9. (PMID: 3186894)
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2:S80-6. (PMID: 19956169)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct 19;9:189. (PMID: 19840368)
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;34(2):401-16. (PMID: 20495999)
BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):400-5. (PMID: 11179160)
Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):801-2. (PMID: 11346313)

Date Created: 20131106 Date Completed: 20140709 Latest Revision: 20240509

20240509

PMC4228340

10.1186/1471-2296-14-167

24188544