Depersonalization disorder: disconnection of cognitive evaluation from autonomic responses to emotional stimuli.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Acoustic Stimulation*; Autonomic Nervous System/*physiopathology ; Cognition/*physiology ; Depersonalization/*physiopathology ; Emotions/*physiology; Adult ; Arousal/physiology ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Galvanic Skin Response/physiology ; Heart Rate/physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Mindfulness ; Psychometrics ; Respiration ; Rest ; Time Factors

Background: Patients with depersonalization disorder (DPD) typically complain about emotional detachment. Previous studies found reduced autonomic responsiveness to emotional stimuli for DPD patients as compared to patients with anxiety disorders. We aimed to investigate autonomic responsiveness to emotional auditory stimuli of DPD patients as compared to patient controls. Furthermore, we examined the modulatory effect of mindful breathing on these responses as well as on depersonalization intensity.
Methods: 22 DPD patients and 15 patient controls balanced for severity of depression and anxiety, age, sex and education, were compared regarding 1) electrodermal and heart rate data during a resting period, and 2) autonomic responses and cognitive appraisal of standardized acoustic affective stimuli in two conditions (normal listening and mindful breathing).
Results: DPD patients rated the emotional sounds as significantly more neutral as compared to patient controls and standardized norm ratings. At the same time, however, they responded more strongly to acoustic emotional stimuli and their electrodermal response pattern was more modulated by valence and arousal as compared to patient controls. Mindful breathing reduced severity of depersonalization in DPD patients and increased the arousal modulation of electrodermal responses in the whole sample. Finally, DPD patients showed an increased electrodermal lability in the rest period as compared to patient controls.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrated that the cognitive evaluation of emotional sounds in DPD patients is disconnected from their autonomic responses to those emotional stimuli. The increased electrodermal lability in DPD may reflect increased introversion and cognitive control of emotional impulses. The findings have important psychotherapeutic implications.

Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):535-49. (PMID: 20512367)
Psychiatry Res. 2010 May 30;177(3):342-9. (PMID: 20381160)
Addiction. 2003 Dec;98(12):1731-6. (PMID: 14651505)
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Dec 21;28(12):E17-45. (PMID: 22134959)
Psychopathology. 2006;39(4):192-8. (PMID: 16717480)
Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81. (PMID: 8737210)
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1959 Oct;7:581-610. (PMID: 14406403)
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. (PMID: 7962581)
CNS Spectr. 2009 Sep;14(9):467-71. (PMID: 19890227)
Int J Psychophysiol. 1990 Nov;10(1):69-73. (PMID: 2269650)
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):1161-70. (PMID: 21573720)
Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):204-15. (PMID: 10731770)
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;28(4):676-91. (PMID: 18006196)
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jan;128(1-2):106-11. (PMID: 20674036)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. (PMID: 12703651)
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Dec;41(12):1451-67. (PMID: 14583413)
Scand J Psychol. 1996 Mar;37(1):103-8. (PMID: 8900823)
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Dec 7;145(2-3):225-31. (PMID: 17074399)
Compr Psychiatry. 2010 Mar-Apr;51(2):187-92. (PMID: 20152301)
J Trauma Dissociation. 2012;13(3):311-29. (PMID: 22545565)
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;57(2):63-9. (PMID: 22340145)
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;59(9):833-8. (PMID: 12215083)
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 15;4(7):e6230. (PMID: 19603072)
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;57(2):70-7. (PMID: 22340146)
Psychiatry Res. 2001 Dec 30;108(3):145-60. (PMID: 11756013)
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2008 Sep;33(3):141-8. (PMID: 18509756)
Psychiatry Res. 2012 May 15;197(1-2):123-7. (PMID: 22414660)
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2004 Sep-Oct;54(9-10):367-74. (PMID: 15343478)
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Jul;197(7):492-8. (PMID: 19597356)
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Dec;174(12):727-35. (PMID: 3783140)
Psychol Med. 2010 Aug;40(8):1239-52. (PMID: 19941676)
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 May;182:428-33. (PMID: 12724246)
Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Nov 1;44(9):898-908. (PMID: 9807645)
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;64(9):990-7. (PMID: 14628973)
Psychiatry Res. 2011 May 30;187(3):441-53. (PMID: 20846726)
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):343-54. (PMID: 15089102)
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Mar;20(1):99-108. (PMID: 21087873)
Psychopathology. 2001 Sep-Oct;34(5):259-64. (PMID: 11799321)
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1939 Apr;15(4):258-66. (PMID: 19312103)
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Aug;195(8):693-6. (PMID: 17700303)
Psychiatry Res. 2000 Mar 6;93(2):153-64. (PMID: 10725532)

Date Created: 20130924 Date Completed: 20140616 Latest Revision: 20211021

20240829

PMC3772934

10.1371/journal.pone.0074331

24058547