Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ على الانترنت اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • الموضوع:
      Patient Care Team* ; Process Assessment, Health Care*; Delivery of Health Care/*organization & administration ; Surveys and Questionnaires/*standards; Belgium ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Cooperative Behavior ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Netherlands ; Patient Safety ; Patient-Centered Care ; Professional-Family Relations ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table.
      Methods: The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated.
      Results: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach's alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated.
      Conclusions: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams.
    • References:
      Med Care Rev. 1994 Fall;51(3):289-335. (PMID: 10138050)
      JAMA. 2007 Mar 14;297(10):1103-11. (PMID: 17356031)
      Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(2):264-8. (PMID: 22560883)
      BMJ. 2009 May 14;338:b1775. (PMID: 19443552)
      Am J Crit Care. 2012 Mar;21(2):e41-52. (PMID: 22381995)
      Implement Sci. 2012 May 18;7:47. (PMID: 22607698)
      BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1717. (PMID: 22434089)
      Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):480-4. (PMID: 21813506)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. (PMID: 21471476)
      N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2124-34. (PMID: 21105794)
      Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):143-51. (PMID: 19032571)
      N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 11;351(20):2041-3. (PMID: 15537902)
      J Hosp Med. 2012 Jan;7(1):48-54. (PMID: 22042511)
      Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):956-9. (PMID: 12627011)
      Health Serv Manage Res. 2007 Aug;20(3):189-202. (PMID: 17683658)
      Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):159-66. (PMID: 21242160)
      J Nurs Manag. 2010 Nov;18(8):926-37. (PMID: 21073566)
      Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Dec;26(4):698-704. (PMID: 22420418)
      J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):11-5. (PMID: 21883717)
      Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Mar;45(3):382-92. (PMID: 17140580)
      Hip Int. 2011 Nov-Dec;21(6):770-1. (PMID: 22117259)
      Eval Health Prof. 2011 Sep;34(3):258-77. (PMID: 21190951)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20130821 Date Completed: 20131021 Latest Revision: 20220408
    • الموضوع:
      20240628
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC3751913
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/1472-6963-13-325
    • الرقم المعرف:
      23958206