Coadaptation of offspring begging and parental provisioning--an evolutionary ecological perspective on avian family life.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: Electronic-Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Adaptation, Physiological* ; Behavior, Animal* ; Social Behavior*; Birds/*physiology; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Male

Offspring begging and parental provisioning are the two central social behaviours expressed during the period of parental care. Both behaviours influence each other and it is, therefore, hypothesized that they should ultimately become (genetically) correlated, stabilized by fitness costs to parents and/or offspring. By reciprocally exchanging entire clutches in canaries (Serinus canaria), we tested (1) whether there is covariation between these behaviours and (2) whether a mismatch--as introduced by cross-fostering--entails costs. Begging was scored in a standardized begging test and parental provisioning was measured via (a) the actual feeding rate and (b) using the growth rate of the foster nestlings as a proxy. Costs were established in terms of future reproductive investment in subsequent clutches and offspring growth. We found a positive and significant phenotypic covariation between offspring begging and parental feeding when using the growth rate as a proxy and, to a lesser extent, in case of the parental feeding rate. Female parents suffered no future reproductive costs when feeding foster nestlings that were more demanding than their own nestlings. Neither growth measured amongst all offspring nor the reproductive investment measured amongst the female offspring as adults was influenced by their begging behaviour. However, the reproductive investment of female offspring tended to depend on the parental qualities of their foster parents. Thus, offspring may only be able to extract resources within the limit of generosity of their foster parents. This suggests parental control of feeding, which is also supported by the positive covariation between offspring begging and parental feeding.

Erratum in: PLoS One. 2013;8(8). doi:10.1371/annotation/cffd172a-2937-4705-aa1f-20de7cb029b0.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Apr;29(2):329-52. (PMID: 15811503)
Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):96-110. (PMID: 11913669)
Science. 2010 Mar 12;327(5971):1373-6. (PMID: 20223985)
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 7;276(1668):2787-94. (PMID: 19419982)
Behav Genet. 2005 Jan;35(1):7-18. (PMID: 15674529)
Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166(4):506-16. (PMID: 16224706)
J Evol Biol. 2010 Aug;23(8):1605-12. (PMID: 20492089)
J Evol Biol. 2011 May;24(5):1091-8. (PMID: 21338437)
Evolution. 2003 Sep;57(9):2191-5. (PMID: 14575340)
Nature. 2003 Jan 30;421(6922):533-5. (PMID: 12556892)
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Dec;7(12):409-13. (PMID: 21236082)
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1303-9. (PMID: 15306355)
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 22;267(1457):2127-32. (PMID: 11416919)
Am Nat. 2004 Jul;164(1):13-24. (PMID: 15266367)
Evolution. 1998 Apr;52(2):299-308. (PMID: 28568322)
Oecologia. 2005 Jun;144(1):32-44. (PMID: 15868160)
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 7;274(1624):2449-56. (PMID: 17650473)
Science. 2001 Jun 1;292(5522):1710-2. (PMID: 11387474)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Aug;88(3):511-36. (PMID: 23279555)
Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Jan;12(1):11-5. (PMID: 21237955)
Evolution. 2009 Mar;63(3):738-48. (PMID: 19210530)
Am Nat. 2004 May;163(5):635-53. (PMID: 15122484)
Am Nat. 2007 Nov;170(5):709-18. (PMID: 17926293)
Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1996 Jul;114(3):271-6. (PMID: 8759148)
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 7;273(1582):71-6. (PMID: 16519237)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11394-8. (PMID: 11572988)
Q Rev Biol. 2006 Sep;81(3):221-36. (PMID: 17051829)

Date Created: 20130730 Date Completed: 20140303 Latest Revision: 20211021

20240829

PMC3716698

10.1371/journal.pone.0070463

23894662