Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Intimate partner femicide in South Africa in 1999 and 2009.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Abrahams N;Abrahams N; Mathews S; Martin LJ; Lombard C; Jewkes R
  • المصدر:
    PLoS medicine [PLoS Med] 2013; Vol. 10 (4), pp. e1001412. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Apr 02.
  • نوع النشر :
    Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101231360 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1549-1676 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15491277 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science, [2004]-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Death is the most extreme consequence of intimate partner violence. Female homicide studies with data on the perpetrator-victim relationship can provide insights. We compare the results of two South African national studies of female homicide with similar sampling done 10 y apart.
      Methods and Findings: We conducted a retrospective national survey using a weighted cluster design of a proportionate random sample of 38 mortuaries to identify homicides committed in 2009. We abstracted victim data from mortuary and autopsy reports, and perpetrator data from police interviews. We compared homicides of women 14 y and older in 2009 with previously published data collected with the same methodology for homicides committed in 1999. The study found that the rate of female homicide per 100,000 female population in 2009 was 12.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3, 16.5), compared to 24.7 (95% CI: 17.7, 31.6) in 1999. The incidence rate ratio of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.84) reflects a significantly lower rate in 2009. The rate of intimate partner femicide was 5.6/100,000 in 2009 versus 8.8/100,000 in 1999, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.24, 1.02), indicating no difference between rates. Logistic regression analysis of homicide characteristics showed that the odds ratio of suspected rape among non-intimate femicides in 2009 compared to 1999 was 2.61 (95% CI: 1.23, 4.08) and among intimate partner femicides it was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.42). The OR of homicide by gunshot was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.99) in 2009 versus 1999. There was a significant drop in convictions of perpetrators of non-intimate femicide in 2009 versus 1999 (OR = 0.32 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.53]). Limitations of the study include the relatively small sample size and having only two time points.
      Conclusions: Female homicide in South Africa was lower in 2009 than 1999, but intimate partner femicide and suspected rape homicide rates were not statistically different. The cause of the difference is unknown. The findings suggest that South Africa needs greater efforts nationally to implement evidence-based violence prevention. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
    • References:
      MMWR Suppl. 2011 Jan 14;60(1):67-70. (PMID: 21430625)
      Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1089-97. (PMID: 12835191)
      Violence Vict. 2009;24(4):546-56. (PMID: 19694357)
      PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28620. (PMID: 22194868)
      Am J Public Health. 2005 Oct;95(10):1811-6. (PMID: 16131646)
      Violence Vict. 2006 Apr;21(2):247-64. (PMID: 16642742)
      AIDS Behav. 2011 Jan;15(1):132-41. (PMID: 20217470)
      Lancet. 2002 Apr 20;359(9315):1423-9. (PMID: 11978358)
      Am J Public Health. 2007 Oct;97(10):1794-802. (PMID: 17761566)
      Soc Sci Med. 2006 Dec;63(11):2949-61. (PMID: 16962222)
      BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a506. (PMID: 18687720)
    • Grant Information:
      United Kingdom Medical Research Council
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20130409 Date Completed: 20130919 Latest Revision: 20231106
    • الموضوع:
      20240628
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC3614499
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pmed.1001412
    • الرقم المعرف:
      23565064